Re: [AFMUG] Baicells 3.65

2017-05-02 Thread Rick Harnish
rick.harnish@baicells.comwww.facebook.com/baicells  From: Af [mailto:af-bounces@afmug.com] On Behalf Of Jason McKemieSent: Sunday, April 30, 2017 7:09 PMTo: af@afmug.comSubject: Re: [AFMUG] Baicells 3.65 So, I bit the bullet and bought a starter kit.  I haven't picked up a sector antenna as of yet thoug

Re: [AFMUG] Baicells 3.65

2017-05-01 Thread Jason McKemie
s Technologies North America, Inc. <https://na.baicells.com/> > > Mobile: (972) 922-1443 > > > > rick.harn...@baicells.com > > www.facebook.com/baicells > > > > > > *From:* Af [mailto:af-boun...@afmug.com] *On Behalf Of *Jason McKemie > *Sent:* Sun

Re: [AFMUG] Baicells 3.65

2017-05-01 Thread Rick Harnish
From: Af [mailto:af-boun...@afmug.com] On Behalf Of Jason McKemie Sent: Sunday, April 30, 2017 7:09 PM To: af@afmug.com Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Baicells 3.65 So, I bit the bullet and bought a starter kit. I haven't picked up a sector antenna as of yet though. The base station appears to have 4 N

Re: [AFMUG] Baicells 3.65

2017-05-01 Thread Rick Harnish
.com <http://www.facebook.com/baicells> www.facebook.com/baicells From: Af [mailto:af-boun...@afmug.com] On Behalf Of Mathew Howard Sent: Sunday, April 30, 2017 10:46 PM To: af <af@afmug.com> Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Baicells 3.65 I think those are slant... should be usable either way, but slan

Re: [AFMUG] Baicells 3.65

2017-04-30 Thread Mathew Howard
I think those are slant... should be usable either way, but slant is probably preferred. I'm actually kind of wondering if the Baicells UE's are really slant, or if they're actually H/V. On Sun, Apr 30, 2017 at 8:28 PM, Jason McKemie < j.mcke...@veloxinetbroadband.com> wrote: > So, I've got a

Re: [AFMUG] Baicells 3.65

2017-04-30 Thread Jason McKemie
So, I've got a Cambium / Laird / whatever antenna from a 320 setup (model 85010107001). I can't remember if these are H/V or slant. Anyone happen to know? On Sunday, April 30, 2017, David Kunat wrote: > Oops, he answered it first! > On Apr 30, 2017, at 3:13 PM, Mathew

Re: [AFMUG] Baicells 3.65

2017-04-30 Thread David Kunat
Oops, he answered it first! > On Apr 30, 2017, at 3:13 PM, Mathew Howard wrote: > > There are only two antenna connectors on the base station. One of the N > connectors is for the GPS antenna... I'm not sure about the 4th, off hand, > but you definitely only need a dual

Re: [AFMUG] Baicells 3.65

2017-04-30 Thread David Kunat
There are only two antenna connectors. The third is for Gps, and the fourth is for a spectrum analyzer, but that function does not exist in software. > On Apr 30, 2017, at 3:09 PM, Jason McKemie > wrote: > > So, I bit the bullet and bought a starter kit. I

Re: [AFMUG] Baicells 3.65

2017-04-30 Thread Jason McKemie
Gotcha, thanks. On Sun, Apr 30, 2017 at 6:13 PM, Mathew Howard wrote: > There are only two antenna connectors on the base station. One of the N > connectors is for the GPS antenna... I'm not sure about the 4th, off hand, > but you definitely only need a dual polarity

Re: [AFMUG] Baicells 3.65

2017-04-30 Thread Mathew Howard
There are only two antenna connectors on the base station. One of the N connectors is for the GPS antenna... I'm not sure about the 4th, off hand, but you definitely only need a dual polarity antenna. On Apr 30, 2017 6:09 PM, "Jason McKemie" wrote: So, I bit

Re: [AFMUG] Baicells 3.65

2017-04-30 Thread Jason McKemie
So, I bit the bullet and bought a starter kit. I haven't picked up a sector antenna as of yet though. The base station appears to have 4 N connectors, but the antennas are all standard dual-pol. Are there just two unused connectors, or am I looking at the wrong antennas? On Sat, Apr 29, 2017

Re: [AFMUG] Baicells 3.65

2017-04-29 Thread Mitch Koep
Dave This won't be another Runcom?? Mitch On 04/29/2017 07:01 PM, David wrote: "Bridge Mode" is not actual layer 2 mode. It tunnels DHCP traffic and perhaps other traffic between the CPE and the Base stating data interface so that you can use Powercode or something similar to hand out

Re: [AFMUG] Baicells 3.65

2017-04-29 Thread David
"Bridge Mode" is not actual layer 2 mode. It tunnels DHCP traffic and perhaps other traffic between the CPE and the Base stating data interface so that you can use Powercode or something similar to hand out addresses. I set it up, and it works for DHCP just fine. The device you plug into the CPE

Re: [AFMUG] Baicells 3.65

2017-04-28 Thread Joe Novak
Eventually there will be a 1/dollar per month fee per user for the Cloud EPC. They are working on a local EPC option but it's not ironed out yet. The monthly user fee is not being charged yet as far as I know. Joe On Fri, Apr 28, 2017 at 3:58 PM, Mitch Koep wrote: > Are

Re: [AFMUG] Baicells 3.65

2017-04-28 Thread Mitch Koep
Are there any hidden fees like monthly, cpe based, AP based, number of users? Core controller? Thanks On 04/28/2017 02:59 PM, Jerry Head wrote: True. On 4/28/2017 2:43 PM, Mathew Howard wrote: Yeah, but the thing I didn't realize before I ordered, was that there's actually no reason you

Re: [AFMUG] Baicells 3.65

2017-04-28 Thread Jerry Head
True. On 4/28/2017 2:43 PM, Mathew Howard wrote: Yeah, but the thing I didn't realize before I ordered, was that there's actually no reason you need to use the Baicells power cable - the eNB does come with the power connector, which can easily be put on cable of the appropriate type. You

Re: [AFMUG] Baicells 3.65

2017-04-28 Thread Mathew Howard
Yeah, but the thing I didn't realize before I ordered, was that there's actually no reason you need to use the Baicells power cable - the eNB does come with the power connector, which can easily be put on cable of the appropriate type. You do need an antenna though... I used a KPP sector. On

Re: [AFMUG] Baicells 3.65

2017-04-28 Thread Jerry Head
You also need a power cable as the base station is not POE. On 4/28/2017 2:30 PM, Tim Alexander wrote: Hi Jason, Just to be clear, you probably know this, you do need an antenna for the AP itself. The firmware is very much in beta. Rate limiting, proper l3 routing, l2 bridging (or what

Re: [AFMUG] Baicells 3.65

2017-04-28 Thread Tim Alexander
Hi Jason, Just to be clear, you probably know this, you do need an antenna for the AP itself. The firmware is very much in beta. Rate limiting, proper l3 routing, l2 bridging (or what passes for it in LTE world), snmp, and comprehensive management are still very much works in progress. The

Re: [AFMUG] Baicells 3.65

2017-04-28 Thread Mathew Howard
If you want to try it, I would highly recommend ordering a starter kit today... they have a pretty nice deal, which I think only runs until April 30th. It will get you an eNB and three UE... and yes, that's all you need to get it running. On Fri, Apr 28, 2017 at 2:23 PM, Josh Luthman

Re: [AFMUG] Baicells 3.65

2017-04-28 Thread Josh Luthman
10W isn't legal in the US. Bridge mode is upcoming, it's in beta right now I think. Just buy an eNB (AP) to put on the tower and some UE (CPE) for customers. Josh Luthman Office: 937-552-2340 Direct: 937-552-2343 1100 Wayne St Suite 1337 Troy, OH 45373 On Fri, Apr 28, 2017 at 3:10 PM, Jason

[AFMUG] Baicells 3.65

2017-04-28 Thread Jason McKemie
I've got a couple of questions for those of you using this gear - Is there anything besides the base station necessary to run this or is it standalone? Is there a bridge mode? Any reason to the the 10W BS vs the 1W? There is a pretty big price difference.

Re: [AFMUG] Baicells 3.65 versus 900 450i

2016-10-22 Thread That One Guy /sarcasm
uh oh On Sat, Oct 22, 2016 at 7:21 PM, Josh Corson wrote: > All, > > Reviewing info on Baicells it seems like a good argument to compare > the two platforms. Before we invest in more 450i equipment I wanted to > get the take on Baicells LTE 3.65 gear. > > The LTE is

[AFMUG] Baicells 3.65 versus 900 450i

2016-10-22 Thread Josh Corson
All, Reviewing info on Baicells it seems like a good argument to compare the two platforms. Before we invest in more 450i equipment I wanted to get the take on Baicells LTE 3.65 gear. The LTE is higher in capacity versus the 900 and in some instances it seems like 3.65 is doing well in NLOS