s ago when the product was first released.
>>
>> On Mon, Jul 3, 2017 at 8:36 AM, Adam Moffett wrote:
>>
>>> http://store.packetflux.com/sitemonitor-5-channel-power-dist
>>> ribution-unit/
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> -- Original Message
t; <https://www.linkedin.com/company/midwest-internet-exchange>
>> <https://twitter.com/mdwestix>
>> The Brothers WISP <http://www.thebrotherswisp.com/>
>> <https://www.facebook.com/thebrotherswisp>
>>
>>
>> <https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCXSdfx
> <https://www.facebook.com/thebrotherswisp>
>
>
> <https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCXSdfxQv7SpoRQYNyLwntZg>
> --------------
> *From: *"Chuck McCown"
> *To: *af@afmug.com
> *Sent: *Tuesday, July 4, 2017 8:48:20 AM
>
> *Subject: *Re: [AFMUG] New AF5X using less po
t: Tuesday, July 04, 2017 6:25 AM
To: af@afmug.com
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] New AF5X using less power than older board revisions?
I'll never understand why people are resistant to doing RMAs.
-
Mike Hammett
Intelligent Computing Solutions
Midwest Internet Exchange
Th
:25 AM
To: af@afmug.com
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] New AF5X using less power than older board revisions?
I'll never understand why people are resistant to doing RMAs.
-
Mike Hammett
Intelligent Computing Solutions
Midwest Internet Exchange
The Brothers
, July 4, 2017 1:37:53 AM
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] New AF5X using less power than older board revisions?
We've never done a RMA on one to my knowledge, at least in recent history. Or
if we have, it's been so few that I haven't become aware of it. I'd have to
look though the
power-dist
>> ribution-unit/
>>
>>
>>
>> ------ Original Message --
>> From: "Kurt Fankhauser"
>> To: af@afmug.com
>> Sent: 7/3/2017 9:09:44 AM
>> Subject: Re: [AFMUG] New AF5X using less power than older board revisions?
>
Yeah I think we have 40 of them out there. No failures that I know of.
-- Original Message --
From: "Mathew Howard"
To: "af"
Sent: 7/3/2017 10:46:45 AM
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] New AF5X using less power than older board
revisions?
We have them all over the place
>>>>> kill-a-watt seems to be better.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> On Fri, Jun 30, 2017 at 7:29 AM, Mathew Howard
>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> Yeah, I think that's pretty consis
gt;
>>
>> -- Original Message --
>> From: "Kurt Fankhauser"
>> To: af@afmug.com
>> Sent: 7/3/2017 9:09:44 AM
>> Subject: Re: [AFMUG] New AF5X using less power than older board revisions?
>>
>> George,
>>
>> What is a pa
36 AM, Adam Moffett wrote:
> http://store.packetflux.com/sitemonitor-5-channel-power-distribution-unit/
>
>
>
> -- Original Message --
> From: "Kurt Fankhauser"
> To: af@afmug.com
> Sent: 7/3/2017 9:09:44 AM
> Subject: Re: [AFMUG] New AF5X using less po
>>
>>>>> Yes. All my AF5X use ~10W. UBNT AC use 6W and older MT 11n use 3-4W.
>>>>> SAF is 30-35. PTP600 is 50.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> On Fri, 30 Jun 2017 12:04:44 +
>>>>> Rory Conaway wrote:
>>
http://store.packetflux.com/sitemonitor-5-channel-power-distribution-unit/
-- Original Message --
From: "Kurt Fankhauser"
To: af@afmug.com
Sent: 7/3/2017 9:09:44 AM
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] New AF5X using less power than older board
revisions?
George,
What is a packetflux
;> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Yes. All my AF5X use ~10W. UBNT AC use 6W and older MT 11n use 3-4W.
>>>> SAF is 30-35. PTP600 is 50.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On Fri, 30 Jun 2017 12:04:44 +0000
>>>> Rory Conaway wrot
y, June 29, 2017 6:43 PM
To: af@afmug.com <mailto:af@afmug.com>
Subject: [AFMUG] New AF5X using less power than older
board revisions?
Provisioning a new AF5X link here on their AC PoE
injectors before they go out
ursday, June 29, 2017 6:43 PM
To: af@afmug.com
Subject: [AFMUG] New AF5X using less power than older board revisions?
Provisioning a new AF5X link here on their AC PoE injectors before they go out
to the field. Something interesting I've noticed, and maybe I'm not remembering
right, but i
That’ll do it!
Chris Wright
Network Administrator
From: Af [mailto:af-boun...@afmug.com] On Behalf Of Mathew Howard
Sent: Friday, June 30, 2017 4:04 PM
To: af
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] New AF5X using less power than older board revisions?
oh... I just occurred to me. The majority of the
0 feet.
>
> On Fri, Jun 30, 2017 at 5:39 PM, wrote:
>
>> Different cable lengths?
>>
>> *From:* Mathew Howard
>> *Sent:* Friday, June 30, 2017 4:36 PM
>> *To:* af
>> *Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] New AF5X using less power than older board
>> revisions
n 2017 12:04:44 +
>>>> Rory Conaway wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> I think you are thinking of the AF24 which cranks 50W all the time.
>>>>>
>>>>> Rory
>>>>>
>>>>> From: Af [mailto:af-boun...@afmug.com] On Behal
Different cable lengths?
From: Mathew Howard
Sent: Friday, June 30, 2017 4:36 PM
To: af
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] New AF5X using less power than older board revisions?
Well, I've always measured them from the DC side, so I could see them going
drawing that much from the wall.
Ki
is 30-35. PTP600 is 50.
>>>
>>>
>>> On Fri, 30 Jun 2017 12:04:44 +
>>> Rory Conaway wrote:
>>>
>>>> I think you are thinking of the AF24 which cranks 50W all the time.
>>>>
>>>> Rory
>>>>
>>
[mailto:af-boun...@afmug.com] *On Behalf Of *Eric Kuhnke
>> *Sent:* Thursday, June 29, 2017 6:43 PM
>> *To:* af@afmug.com
>> *Subject:* [AFMUG] New AF5X using less power than older board revisions?
>>
>>
>>
>> Provisioning a new AF5X link here on their AC Po
*From:*Af [mailto:af-boun...@afmug.com
<mailto:af-boun...@afmug.com>] *On Behalf Of *Eric Kuhnke
*Sent:* Thursday, June 29, 2017 6:43 PM
*To:* af@afmug.com <mailto:af@afmug.com>
*Subject:* [AFMUG] New AF5X using less power than older board
revisions?
Provision
-boun...@afmug.com] On Behalf Of Eric Kuhnke
>>> Sent: Thursday, June 29, 2017 6:43 PM
>>> To: af@afmug.com
>>> Subject: [AFMUG] New AF5X using less power than older board revisions?
>>>
>>> Provisioning a new AF5X link here on their AC PoE injectors bef
> *To:* af@afmug.com
> *Subject:* [AFMUG] New AF5X using less power than older board revisions?
>
>
>
> Provisioning a new AF5X link here on their AC PoE injectors before they go
> out to the field. Something interesting I've noticed, and maybe I'm not
> rememberi
e 29, 2017 6:43 PM
>> To: af@afmug.com
>> Subject: [AFMUG] New AF5X using less power than older board revisions?
>>
>> Provisioning a new AF5X link here on their AC PoE injectors before they
>> go out to the field. Something interesting I've noticed, and maybe I&#
Sent: Thursday, June 29, 2017 6:43 PM
To: af@afmug.com
Subject: [AFMUG] New AF5X using less power than older
board revisions?
Provisioning a new AF5X link here on their AC PoE
injectors before they go out to the field. Something
interesting I've noticed, and maybe I'm not remember
I think you are thinking of the AF24 which cranks 50W all the time.
Rory
From: Af [mailto:af-boun...@afmug.com] On Behalf Of Eric Kuhnke
Sent: Thursday, June 29, 2017 6:43 PM
To: af@afmug.com
Subject: [AFMUG] New AF5X using less power than older board revisions?
Provisioning a new AF5X link
Provisioning a new AF5X link here on their AC PoE injectors before they go
out to the field. Something interesting I've noticed, and maybe I'm not
remembering right, but it seems that the newer AF5X use less power than the
older ones.
This unit with its ubnt default PoE injector plugged into a kil
29 matches
Mail list logo
