v" <d...@logicalwebhost.com>
To: af@afmug.com
Sent: Wednesday, December 6, 2017 7:42:03 PM
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] RAID controller eats disks?
with RAID 5 you have drive redundancy, but with RAID 6 it distributes the data
to rebuild your array across the volume in such a way where you can lose
with RAID 5 you have drive redundancy, but with RAID 6 it distributes the data
to rebuild your array across the volume in such a way where you can lose two
whole hard drives (but not three) and still rebuild.
With larger drives you have higher likelihood that you’d have your failed
drive, but
On 12/6/17 12:02, Adam Moffett wrote:
Well...I'm using 15K SAS in RAID10. Only 600GB because enterprise drives
are $$.
Out of curiosity what is it that I would need good luck for?
Reliability problems?
The largest RAID6 I have currently is 12x 4TB with a hot spare. It takes
forever
2017 12:58:44 PM
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] RAID controller eats disks?
To add to this, if you are using raid5/6 with modern consumer multiple
TB disks... Well... Good luck to you.
On Dec 6, 2017 11:47 AM, "Dev" <d...@logicalwebhost.com> wrote:
ZFS and some of the other more recent additio
To add to this, if you are using raid5/6 with modern consumer multiple TB
disks... Well... Good luck to you.
On Dec 6, 2017 11:47 AM, "Dev" wrote:
> ZFS and some of the other more recent additions do offer some tasty
> features, along with HBA’s, but there’s much wider
ZFS and some of the other more recent additions do offer some tasty features,
along with HBA’s, but there’s much wider support, deeper toolset and more
documentation for the average person to get RAID 6 working than some of the new
cluster stuff.
Yes, it’s cool, yes, it works and scales,
On 12/6/17 04:50, Mike Hammett wrote:
Ditch RAID and just go to HBAs with a better file system like ZFS or CEPH.
Whenever this topic comes up I feel like I must be the only one who's
never really had a problem with RAID controllers.
Maybe next time.
-- Original Message --
From: "Mike Hammett" <af...@ics-il.net>
To: af@afmug.com
Sent: 12/6/2017 7:50:42 AM
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] RAID controller eats disks?
Ditch RAID and just go to HBAs with a better file system like ZFS or
CEPH.
-
Mike Ham
Interesting thought.
-- Original Message --
From: "Josh Reynolds" <j...@kyneticwifi.com>
To: af@afmug.com
Sent: 12/6/2017 1:23:16 AM
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] RAID controller eats disks?
I would consider a problem with the power cable used to feed that disk.
On Dec 5, 201
sday, December 5, 2017 11:48:06 PM
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] RAID controller eats disks?
Old RAID controllers are notorious for misbehaving and giving false readings on
drive/volume health. Additionally, the older the controller, the harder it is
to find good shelf spares with matching mod
I would consider a problem with the power cable used to feed that disk.
On Dec 5, 2017 11:48 PM, "Dev" wrote:
> Old RAID controllers are notorious for misbehaving and giving false
> readings on drive/volume health. Additionally, the older the controller,
> the harder it
Old RAID controllers are notorious for misbehaving and giving false readings on
drive/volume health. Additionally, the older the controller, the harder it is
to find good shelf spares with matching model/firmware, etc. that will be happy
reading your RAID volume(s) in the event of a controller
g.com
Sent: 12/4/2017 9:59:50 AM
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] RAID controller eats disks?
I'm more impressed that you're actually getting a report predicting
that the drive is failing. I have never ever had a raid controller
report a disk may be failing. They just go straight from working to
failed.
I'm more impressed that you're actually getting a report predicting that
the drive is failing. I have never ever had a raid controller report a
disk may be failing. They just go straight from working to failed.
Usually failing into a high latency state, where they still work, just
really
I've got a somewhat old Dell Poweredge with a PERC H700 RAID controller.
About a year ago SMART predicted a failure on disk 4, so I replaced it.
A few weeks ago SMART predicted a failure on disk 4, so I replaced it.
Today SMART predicts a failure on disk 4.
On the second incident I have no
15 matches
Mail list logo