Well, SAF responded quickly to my query on this, I havent had a chance to
test it but since the path instead of radio to radio it would be radio1
router1 radio1 radio2 router2 radio2 I think the delay would be negligible
By default service packets are running only with 1 hop TTL limit, which is
well shit
On Fri, Aug 7, 2015 at 3:47 PM, Vlad Sedov v...@atlasok.com wrote:
Yup, they talk to each other via IP. We ran into the same thing with our
SAFs.. Kinda silly, I think.
Vlad
On 8/7/2015 3:31 PM, That One Guy /sarcasm wrote:
Aligning a SAF link, its up, passing traffic, just
Yup, they talk to each other via IP. We ran into the same thing with our
SAFs.. Kinda silly, I think.
Vlad
On 8/7/2015 3:31 PM, That One Guy /sarcasm wrote:
Aligning a SAF link, its up, passing traffic, just neither side is
displaying the remote info, config is thesame as our other saf link
Aligning a SAF link, its up, passing traffic, just neither side is
displaying the remote info, config is thesame as our other saf link that it
is displaying, with the exception that the working one both radios are on
the same subnet, this one they are on serarate /30. do the pull remote side
data
I've seen it as well.
I have concluded that the radios each communicate with each other via ip.
if they are not on the same subnet you will have trouble until the network is
connected/routed.
I have noticed that (with the Integra W's were using) the management ports
bridge traffic across the
