you trace that to the customer/port?
>
>
>
> *From:* Af [mailto:af-boun...@afmug.com] *On Behalf Of *Ty Featherling
> *Sent:* Friday, February 19, 2016 7:05 PM
> *To:* af@afmug.com
> *Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] IPv6 traffic to ff02::1:2
>
>
>
> Forgot to update: had the
How did you trace that to the customer/port?
From: Af [mailto:af-boun...@afmug.com] On Behalf Of Ty Featherling
Sent: Friday, February 19, 2016 7:05 PM
To: af@afmug.com
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] IPv6 traffic to ff02::1:2
Forgot to update: had the customer reboot his router and the traffic
lto:af-boun...@afmug.com <af-boun...@afmug.com>] *On
> Behalf Of *Ty Featherling
> *Sent:* Thursday, February 18, 2016 10:08 AM
> *To:* af@afmug.com
> *Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] IPv6 traffic to ff02::1:2
>
>
>
> Found the offending customer and looking at their radio I can see t
Featherling
*Sent:* Thursday, February 18, 2016 10:08 AM
*To:* af@afmug.com
*Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] IPv6 traffic to ff02::1:2
Found the offending customer and looking at their radio I can see the
actual traffic is about 5Mbps worth but the traffic shaping knocks it
down to 1.5 before it reaches our
ROFL .. that’s awesome…
From: Af [mailto:af-boun...@afmug.com] On Behalf Of Chris Wright
Sent: Thursday, February 18, 2016 1:22 PM
To: af@afmug.com
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] IPv6 traffic to ff02::1:2
It just really, REALLY wants everyone to know it exists. Cute little thing.
Set it on fire
“IPv6 compatible” etc for marketing … we tested if they can actually
function properly without breaking…
From: Af [mailto:af-boun...@afmug.com] On Behalf Of Ty Featherling
Sent: Thursday, February 18, 2016 1:08 PM
To: af@afmug.com
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] IPv6 traffic to ff02::1:2
Found
> Velociter Wireless
>
> 209-838-1221 x115
>
>
>
> *From:* Af [mailto:af-boun...@afmug.com] *On Behalf Of *Ty Featherling
> *Sent:* Thursday, February 18, 2016 10:08 AM
> *To:* af@afmug.com
> *Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] IPv6 traffic to ff02::1:2
>
>
>
> Fo
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] IPv6 traffic to ff02::1:2
Found the offending customer and looking at their radio I can see the actual
traffic is about 5Mbps worth but the traffic shaping knocks it down to 1.5
before it reaches our network. Makes me think this is more like a
malfunctioning router than
Found the offending customer and looking at their radio I can see the
actual traffic is about 5Mbps worth but the traffic shaping knocks it down
to 1.5 before it reaches our network. Makes me think this is more like a
malfunctioning router than a feature.
-Ty
-Ty
On Wed, Feb 17, 2016 at 2:43
1 layer 2 network per tower. All APs and CPE bridged to that one broadcast
domain.
-Ty
-Ty
On Wed, Feb 17, 2016 at 2:32 PM, Cassidy B. Larson wrote:
> How big is your layer2 network? Ideally, with multicast, your switch
> should only be sending it to the hosts that
How big is your layer2 network? Ideally, with multicast, your switch should
only be sending it to the hosts that subscribe to that multicast IP.
> On Feb 17, 2016, at 10:54 AM, Ty Featherling wrote:
>
> So it's DHCPv6 discovery? Why the hell so much traffic then? If
So it's DHCPv6 discovery? Why the hell so much traffic then? If I can find
the source radio I will definitely turn off multicast. Good idea.
-Ty
-Ty
On Wed, Feb 17, 2016 at 11:51 AM, Cassidy B. Larson
wrote:
> Look for the mac: a813.430a.5950 I think. That’s the source
Look for the mac: a813.430a.5950 I think. That’s the source MAC, assuming I
flipped the right bit. I know the last 8 are right at least.
You could just turn off multicast on his radio or the AP, but his router is
looking for a DHCP server and sending to that multicast address in question.
If
Yes, I see it too.
Was wondering exactly what is going on and how to ‘trim’ the chatter down.
It’s about a meg of traffic on my system too.
Dennis? Any ideas?
From: Af [mailto:af-boun...@afmug.com] On Behalf Of Ty Featherling
Sent: Wednesday, February 17, 2016 10:47 AM
To: af@afmug.com
14 matches
Mail list logo