Re: [AFMUG] PMP100 Stand Alone / Backhaul From SM?

/2016 9:24:22 PM Subject: Re: [AFMUG] PMP100 Stand Alone / Backhaul From SM? Awesome. Thank you for the quick replies. On Thu, Jul 14, 2016 at 5:22 PM, Kade Sullivan <k...@mutel.com> wrote: It'll work just fine. We actually have a couple redundant links using RSTP that are just SMs poi

Re: [AFMUG] PMP100 Stand Alone / Backhaul From SM?

Awesome. Thank you for the quick replies. On Thu, Jul 14, 2016 at 5:22 PM, Kade Sullivan wrote: > It'll work just fine. We actually have a couple redundant links using > RSTP that are just SMs pointing to another tower. > > Like Ken, said, it's not a long term solution, but

Re: [AFMUG] PMP100 Stand Alone / Backhaul From SM?

It'll work just fine. We actually have a couple redundant links using RSTP that are just SMs pointing to another tower. Like Ken, said, it's not a long term solution, but for what you are doing it would work exactly as you expect. On Thu, Jul 14, 2016 at 4:18 PM, Ken Hohhof

Re: [AFMUG] PMP100 Stand Alone / Backhaul From SM?

I have done it. Make sure SM isolation isn’t on. I wouldn’t use it as a long term solution, but for what you’re describing, I have done it and it worked. From: Christopher Gray Sent: Thursday, July 14, 2016 4:11 PM To: af@afmug.com Subject: [AFMUG] PMP100 Stand Alone / Backhaul From SM? I'm

Re: [AFMUG] PMP100 Stand Alone / Backhaul From SM?

we did this once when we had a backhaul go down to a site with a pmp100 5ghz AP that was within view of a decomissioned 5ghz AP at another site and had no customers on it. Just changed it to an SM and put the down sites color code on, worked in the pinch over the weekend til we could get the