Re: [AFMUG] Looking for a few good beta testers

[Mike Hammett]

That seems like an arbitrary and silly stick to measure against. 




- 
Mike Hammett 
Intelligent Computing Solutions 

Midwest Internet Exchange 

The Brothers WISP 




- Original Message -

From: "Eric Kuhnke"  
To: af@afmug.com 
Sent: Tuesday, April 11, 2017 10:27:07 PM 
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Looking for a few good beta testers 


If you're advertising anything for security and don't have an https-enabled 
website (LetsEncrypt is free), it's hard to take seriously. Even if it's just 
marketing material. 



On Tue, Apr 11, 2017 at 11:59 AM, Harold Bledsoe < hbledso...@gmail.com > 
wrote: 



Hi folks, 


We have a new integration launching soon on the IgniteNet platform that is a 
home/business cloud video surveillance solution. It essentially lets you as an 
operator offer a Nest-like video solution to your customers so you can get paid 
for what folks are going to do anyways over your network. 


We are looking for a handful of early adopters who would be interested to roll 
out something like this to beta test, give feedback, etc. It would be great if 
you can hit me offlist if you want to try it out! 


http://na.smc.com/ 



Highlights are here. :-) 


Thanks, 
-Hal 

Re: [AFMUG] Looking for a few good beta testers

[Eric Kuhnke]

If you're advertising anything for security and don't have an https-enabled
website (LetsEncrypt is free), it's hard to take seriously. Even if it's
just marketing material.

On Tue, Apr 11, 2017 at 11:59 AM, Harold Bledsoe 
wrote:

> Hi folks,
>
> We have a new integration launching soon on the IgniteNet platform that is
> a home/business cloud video surveillance solution.  It essentially lets you
> as an operator offer a Nest-like video solution to your customers so you
> can get paid for what folks are going to do anyways over your network.
>
> We are looking for a handful of early adopters who would be interested to
> roll out something like this to beta test, give feedback, etc.  It would be
> great if you can hit me offlist if you want to try it out!
>
> http://na.smc.com/
>
> Highlights are here.  :-)
>
> Thanks,
> -Hal
>

Re: [AFMUG] Small Trencher

[Tim Reichhart]

Ez trench aka cable layer


-Original Message-
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Small Trencher
From: Jeremy 
To: af@afmug.com
Date: 04/12/17 04:22:12am

I rent a Toro Dingo.  I'd like to buy one...there is a decent used market.  
They run around $20-25K otherwise 
On Tue, Apr 11, 2017 at 4:34 PM, Chris Fabien  wrote:
We tell the customer to do it for wireless installs. Dont want hassle of 
utility locates etc.  
On Apr 11, 2017 12:54 PM, "Matt"  wrote:What is 
everyone using to trench short drops in?  Not just fiber but
we frequently must put a pole in yard where there is LOS to the tower.
We already have a large unit that we must haul with trailer but was
looking for something that would fit on back of truck etc.
   
 

Re: [AFMUG] Small Trencher

[Jeremy]

I rent a Toro Dingo.  I'd like to buy one...there is a decent used market.
They run around $20-25K otherwise

On Tue, Apr 11, 2017 at 4:34 PM, Chris Fabien  wrote:

> We tell the customer to do it for wireless installs. Dont want hassle of
> utility locates etc.
>
> On Apr 11, 2017 12:54 PM, "Matt"  wrote:
>
>> What is everyone using to trench short drops in?  Not just fiber but
>> we frequently must put a pole in yard where there is LOS to the tower.
>> We already have a large unit that we must haul with trailer but was
>> looking for something that would fit on back of truck etc.
>>
>

[AFMUG] new PacketFlux injectors

[George Skorup]

So... when is the RackInjector supposed to start shipping? Got a site 
with an 8-port injector and a SyncInjector and now need to add a couple 
more APs. So might as well replace it all with a RackInjector and gain a 
couple ports in the process. It's the towers that you never expected to 
have 15+ radios.


And 12-port DIN PowerInjector+Sync? Got more smaller sites to upgrade 
too this spring and would be handy to have.

Re: [AFMUG] OT Something good

[Bruce Robertson]

Okay... plus about a billion.

On 4/10/17 7:22 AM, Chuck McCown wrote:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ojRj2JK5oCI#action=share
!DSPAM:2,58eb952f107201035889510! 

Re: [AFMUG] Small Trencher

[Chris Fabien]

We tell the customer to do it for wireless installs. Dont want hassle of
utility locates etc.

On Apr 11, 2017 12:54 PM, "Matt"  wrote:

> What is everyone using to trench short drops in?  Not just fiber but
> we frequently must put a pole in yard where there is LOS to the tower.
> We already have a large unit that we must haul with trailer but was
> looking for something that would fit on back of truck etc.
>

Re: [AFMUG] OID for Channel Width on ePMP?

[SmarterBroadband]

Thanks Josh.

 

So 1 =10, 2 = 20 etc?

 

How could I use that in a label in The Dude?  Is there a way to say if 1 then 
show 10 etc?

 

Thanks

 

Adam

 

From: Af [mailto:af-boun...@afmug.com] On Behalf Of Josh Luthman
Sent: Tuesday, April 11, 2017 12:27 PM
To: af@afmug.com
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] OID for Channel Width on ePMP?

 

epmp is 1-4

1.3.6.1.4.1.17713.21.3.8.2.5.0




 

Josh Luthman
Office: 937-552-2340
Direct: 937-552-2343
1100 Wayne St
Suite 1337
Troy, OH 45373

 

On Tue, Apr 11, 2017 at 2:05 PM, SmarterBroadband  > wrote:

Actually, same for FSK and 450?

 

From: Af [mailto:af-boun...@afmug.com  ] On Behalf 
Of SmarterBroadband
Sent: Tuesday, April 11, 2017 11:04 AM
To: af@afmug.com  
Subject: [AFMUG] OID for Channel Width on ePMP?

 

Anyone know the OID for channel width on ePMP?

 

Thanks

 

Adam

 

Re: [AFMUG] Thoughts on Kaspersky

[Steve Jones]

central management was key, the other features like port controls, app
controls, alert notification, remote lockdown, etc are why we have stuck
with corporate symantec and when they came out with SBE it was nice, the
server was alot less cumbersome, policy deployment streamlined, etc. Werent
too sure about the cloud on this iteration, but its even better than any of
the on premise variants. I also like threatcon level response, and
immediate definition package updates, with on premise it was a pain to push
new packages and verify policy changes propagated, now its all but instant.
Webroot Ive never cared for, its what my mom used to run, always buggy and
causing issues, I always assumed it was on par with Fprot and AVG, present,
bulky, and useless



On Tue, Apr 11, 2017 at 2:30 PM, Josh Reynolds  wrote:

> Why not WebRoot? If cost is a factor and you want something easy to manage
> with cloud based machine learning, it seems to do better in detection while
> being easier in terms of management.
>
> Are you using SEP due to familiarity with their other products in the past?
>
> - Josh
>
> On Apr 11, 2017 1:06 PM, "Steve Jones"  wrote:
>
>> thats why we use symantec endpoint, not to be confused with norton, it
>> just has no mobile device solution
>>
>>
>> On Tue, Apr 11, 2017 at 12:35 PM, Josh Reynolds 
>> wrote:
>>
>>> Traditional AV is long, long dead. Don't sell your customers snake oil.
>>> You end up compromising machine performance and stability while introducing
>>> a false sense of security and actually adding an attack surface. Heuristic
>>> scanning has been absolute crap for a long time - last report I saw showed
>>> a roughly 5% detection success rate.
>>>
>>> I suggest checking out some of the more modern + next gen AV vendors.
>>>
>>> For further reading on this, /r/MSP had a brief but enlightening
>>> discussion on this recently.
>>>
>>> https://www.reddit.com/r/msp/comments/63e4gt/next_gen_antivi
>>> rus_solutions/
>>>
>>> - Josh
>>>
>>> On Apr 11, 2017 9:55 AM, "Steve Jones" 
>>> wrote:
>>>
 We are a symantec endpoint shop for our contract customers, but they do
 not offer a mobile client package.
 Kaspersky does. Ive always liked their products, seem effective,
 slightly less cumbersome to a system than the SEP. The only downside is
 full protection tends to cause a 20-30 percent decrease in network
 throughput in its default scan state, I assume that can be remedied with
 some configuration changes.

 My largest concern is its a Russian cyber-security entity, this does
 make me somewhat cautious. Ive never read any negative about their
 "trustability" in regard to their home region. If anything else, I would
 suspect they have greater access to source code for generating definition
 libraries.

 Anyone here ever deployed any of their SMB/Corporate solution?

>>>
>>

Re: [AFMUG] Thoughts on Kaspersky

[Josh Reynolds]

Why not WebRoot? If cost is a factor and you want something easy to manage
with cloud based machine learning, it seems to do better in detection while
being easier in terms of management.

Are you using SEP due to familiarity with their other products in the past?

- Josh

On Apr 11, 2017 1:06 PM, "Steve Jones"  wrote:

> thats why we use symantec endpoint, not to be confused with norton, it
> just has no mobile device solution
>
>
> On Tue, Apr 11, 2017 at 12:35 PM, Josh Reynolds 
> wrote:
>
>> Traditional AV is long, long dead. Don't sell your customers snake oil.
>> You end up compromising machine performance and stability while introducing
>> a false sense of security and actually adding an attack surface. Heuristic
>> scanning has been absolute crap for a long time - last report I saw showed
>> a roughly 5% detection success rate.
>>
>> I suggest checking out some of the more modern + next gen AV vendors.
>>
>> For further reading on this, /r/MSP had a brief but enlightening
>> discussion on this recently.
>>
>> https://www.reddit.com/r/msp/comments/63e4gt/next_gen_antivi
>> rus_solutions/
>>
>> - Josh
>>
>> On Apr 11, 2017 9:55 AM, "Steve Jones"  wrote:
>>
>>> We are a symantec endpoint shop for our contract customers, but they do
>>> not offer a mobile client package.
>>> Kaspersky does. Ive always liked their products, seem effective,
>>> slightly less cumbersome to a system than the SEP. The only downside is
>>> full protection tends to cause a 20-30 percent decrease in network
>>> throughput in its default scan state, I assume that can be remedied with
>>> some configuration changes.
>>>
>>> My largest concern is its a Russian cyber-security entity, this does
>>> make me somewhat cautious. Ive never read any negative about their
>>> "trustability" in regard to their home region. If anything else, I would
>>> suspect they have greater access to source code for generating definition
>>> libraries.
>>>
>>> Anyone here ever deployed any of their SMB/Corporate solution?
>>>
>>
>

Re: [AFMUG] OID for Channel Width on ePMP?

[Josh Luthman]

epmp is 1-4
1.3.6.1.4.1.17713.21.3.8.2.5.0


Josh Luthman
Office: 937-552-2340
Direct: 937-552-2343
1100 Wayne St
Suite 1337
Troy, OH 45373

On Tue, Apr 11, 2017 at 2:05 PM, SmarterBroadband  wrote:

> Actually, same for FSK and 450?
>
>
>
> *From:* Af [mailto:af-boun...@afmug.com] *On Behalf Of *SmarterBroadband
> *Sent:* Tuesday, April 11, 2017 11:04 AM
> *To:* af@afmug.com
> *Subject:* [AFMUG] OID for Channel Width on ePMP?
>
>
>
> Anyone know the OID for channel width on ePMP?
>
>
>
> Thanks
>
>
>
> Adam
>

[AFMUG] Looking for a few good beta testers

[Harold Bledsoe]

Hi folks,

We have a new integration launching soon on the IgniteNet platform that is
a home/business cloud video surveillance solution.  It essentially lets you
as an operator offer a Nest-like video solution to your customers so you
can get paid for what folks are going to do anyways over your network.

We are looking for a handful of early adopters who would be interested to
roll out something like this to beta test, give feedback, etc.  It would be
great if you can hit me offlist if you want to try it out!

http://na.smc.com/

Highlights are here.  :-)

Thanks,
-Hal

Re: [AFMUG] Thoughts on Kaspersky

[Steve Jones]

thats why we use symantec endpoint, not to be confused with norton, it just
has no mobile device solution


On Tue, Apr 11, 2017 at 12:35 PM, Josh Reynolds 
wrote:

> Traditional AV is long, long dead. Don't sell your customers snake oil.
> You end up compromising machine performance and stability while introducing
> a false sense of security and actually adding an attack surface. Heuristic
> scanning has been absolute crap for a long time - last report I saw showed
> a roughly 5% detection success rate.
>
> I suggest checking out some of the more modern + next gen AV vendors.
>
> For further reading on this, /r/MSP had a brief but enlightening
> discussion on this recently.
>
> https://www.reddit.com/r/msp/comments/63e4gt/next_gen_antivirus_solutions/
>
> - Josh
>
> On Apr 11, 2017 9:55 AM, "Steve Jones"  wrote:
>
>> We are a symantec endpoint shop for our contract customers, but they do
>> not offer a mobile client package.
>> Kaspersky does. Ive always liked their products, seem effective, slightly
>> less cumbersome to a system than the SEP. The only downside is full
>> protection tends to cause a 20-30 percent decrease in network throughput in
>> its default scan state, I assume that can be remedied with some
>> configuration changes.
>>
>> My largest concern is its a Russian cyber-security entity, this does make
>> me somewhat cautious. Ive never read any negative about their
>> "trustability" in regard to their home region. If anything else, I would
>> suspect they have greater access to source code for generating definition
>> libraries.
>>
>> Anyone here ever deployed any of their SMB/Corporate solution?
>>
>

Re: [AFMUG] OID for Channel Width on ePMP?

[SmarterBroadband]

Actually, same for FSK and 450?

 

From: Af [mailto:af-boun...@afmug.com] On Behalf Of SmarterBroadband
Sent: Tuesday, April 11, 2017 11:04 AM
To: af@afmug.com
Subject: [AFMUG] OID for Channel Width on ePMP?

 

Anyone know the OID for channel width on ePMP?

 

Thanks

 

Adam

[AFMUG] OID for Channel Width on ePMP?

[SmarterBroadband]

Anyone know the OID for channel width on ePMP?

 

Thanks

 

Adam

Re: [AFMUG] Thoughts on Kaspersky

[Josh Reynolds]

Traditional AV is long, long dead. Don't sell your customers snake oil. You
end up compromising machine performance and stability while introducing a
false sense of security and actually adding an attack surface. Heuristic
scanning has been absolute crap for a long time - last report I saw showed
a roughly 5% detection success rate.

I suggest checking out some of the more modern + next gen AV vendors.

For further reading on this, /r/MSP had a brief but enlightening discussion
on this recently.

https://www.reddit.com/r/msp/comments/63e4gt/next_gen_antivirus_solutions/

- Josh

On Apr 11, 2017 9:55 AM, "Steve Jones"  wrote:

> We are a symantec endpoint shop for our contract customers, but they do
> not offer a mobile client package.
> Kaspersky does. Ive always liked their products, seem effective, slightly
> less cumbersome to a system than the SEP. The only downside is full
> protection tends to cause a 20-30 percent decrease in network throughput in
> its default scan state, I assume that can be remedied with some
> configuration changes.
>
> My largest concern is its a Russian cyber-security entity, this does make
> me somewhat cautious. Ive never read any negative about their
> "trustability" in regard to their home region. If anything else, I would
> suspect they have greater access to source code for generating definition
> libraries.
>
> Anyone here ever deployed any of their SMB/Corporate solution?
>

Re: [AFMUG] Thoughts on Kaspersky

[Jon Bruce]

I've had a lot of luck with e-set. It's not heavy and bloated and the 
price doesn't kill you.



On 4/11/2017 12:08 PM, Steve Jones wrote:
yeah, we sell Lenovo primarily, It may help, the russians with 
kaspersky will try to stop the chinese from lenovo from stealing our 
client data.


Malwarebytes has always amazed me in its ability to find and mitigate 
all kinds of threats, Ive looked at them as a solution as well. 
Seriously considered using strictly malwarebytes, but its got some 
technical curve as a real time client in things it asks the users about












On Tue, Apr 11, 2017 at 10:38 AM, Rory Conaway > wrote:


Security Essentials couldn’t catch a butterfly with a tent sized
net and at this point is a joke.   Magazines don’t even both
testing it any longer against real products.  When it couldn’t’
catch 50% of the viruses when everyone else was above 70% to 100%,
they gave up.  Kapersky can’t be used like Lenovo for anything
governmental because the entire Eastern Block has access to it.  
Symantec, although one of the best, is constantly being penetrated

by porn sites (we have many field testers as clients).  The best
combination so far that we have found is Symantec supplemented by
Malwarebytes full version. At the head end, Barracuda Web Gateway
devices have Malwarebytes signatures among other things.

Rory

*From:*Af [mailto:af-boun...@afmug.com
] *On Behalf Of *CBB - Jay Fuller
*Sent:* Tuesday, April 11, 2017 8:24 AM
*To:* af@afmug.com 
*Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] Thoughts on Kaspersky

I have deployed a symantec endpoint solution. client dropped it a
few years ago cause it got too bloated.  moved to microsoft
security essentials based on suggestions from this list.

- Original Message -

*From:*Steve Jones 

*To:*af@afmug.com 

*Sent:*Tuesday, April 11, 2017 9:55 AM

*Subject:*[AFMUG] Thoughts on Kaspersky

We are a symantec endpoint shop for our contract customers,
but they do not offer a mobile client package.

Kaspersky does. Ive always liked their products, seem
effective, slightly less cumbersome to a system than the SEP.
The only downside is full protection tends to cause a 20-30
percent decrease in network throughput in its default scan
state, I assume that can be remedied with some configuration
changes.

My largest concern is its a Russian cyber-security entity,
this does make me somewhat cautious. Ive never read any
negative about their "trustability" in regard to their home
region. If anything else, I would suspect they have greater
access to source code for generating definition libraries.

Anyone here ever deployed any of their SMB/Corporate solution?

Re: [AFMUG] Small Trencher

[David Coudron]

We have been using a small edger from Menards/Home Depot.  One person can move 
it around and put it in the back of a truck.   It is a little slow and the 
cable doesn't get buried that deep, but otherwise seems to work OK.

http://www.homedepot.com/p/Powermate-9-in-79cc-Gas-Walk-Behind-Edger-with-Curb-Hopping-Feature-PWLE0799/202817519



David Coudron
david.coud...@advantenon.com  |  Mobile: 612-991-7474
 
Advantenon, Inc.       
i...@advantenon.com  |  3500 Vicksburg Lane N, Suite 315, Plymouth, MN 55447  | 
 www.advantenon.com  |  Phone: 800-704-4720  |  Local: 612-454-1545 



-Original Message-
From: Af [mailto:af-boun...@afmug.com] On Behalf Of Matt
Sent: Tuesday, April 11, 2017 11:54 AM
To: af@afmug.com
Subject: [AFMUG] Small Trencher

What is everyone using to trench short drops in?  Not just fiber but we 
frequently must put a pole in yard where there is LOS to the tower.
We already have a large unit that we must haul with trailer but was looking for 
something that would fit on back of truck etc.

Re: [AFMUG] Small Trencher

[Jesse DuPont]

  
  
Berreto 2024TKD is what we rent when we need one.


  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
Jesse DuPont

  Network
  Architect
  email: jesse.dup...@celeritycorp.net
  Celerity Networks LLC
  Celerity
  Broadband LLC
Like us! facebook.com/celeritynetworksllc
  Like us! facebook.com/celeritybroadband
  

  

On 4/11/17 10:54 AM, Matt wrote:


  What is everyone using to trench short drops in?  Not just fiber but
we frequently must put a pole in yard where there is LOS to the tower.
We already have a large unit that we must haul with trailer but was
looking for something that would fit on back of truck etc.



  

[AFMUG] Small Trencher

[Matt]

What is everyone using to trench short drops in?  Not just fiber but
we frequently must put a pole in yard where there is LOS to the tower.
We already have a large unit that we must haul with trailer but was
looking for something that would fit on back of truck etc.

Re: [AFMUG] Thoughts on Kaspersky

[Steve Jones]

yeah, we sell Lenovo primarily, It may help, the russians with kaspersky
will try to stop the chinese from lenovo from stealing our client data.

Malwarebytes has always amazed me in its ability to find and mitigate all
kinds of threats, Ive looked at them as a solution as well. Seriously
considered using strictly malwarebytes, but its got some technical curve as
a real time client in things it asks the users about











On Tue, Apr 11, 2017 at 10:38 AM, Rory Conaway 
wrote:

> Security Essentials couldn’t catch a butterfly with a tent sized net and
> at this point is a joke.   Magazines don’t even both testing it any longer
> against real products.  When it couldn’t’ catch 50% of the viruses when
> everyone else was above 70% to 100%, they gave up.  Kapersky can’t be used
> like Lenovo for anything governmental because the entire Eastern Block has
> access to it.   Symantec, although one of the best, is constantly being
> penetrated by porn sites (we have many field testers as clients).  The best
> combination so far that we have found is Symantec supplemented by
> Malwarebytes full version.  At the head end, Barracuda Web Gateway devices
> have Malwarebytes signatures among other things.
>
>
>
> Rory
>
>
>
> *From:* Af [mailto:af-boun...@afmug.com] *On Behalf Of *CBB - Jay Fuller
> *Sent:* Tuesday, April 11, 2017 8:24 AM
> *To:* af@afmug.com
> *Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] Thoughts on Kaspersky
>
>
>
>
>
> I have deployed a symantec endpoint solution.  client dropped it a few
> years ago cause it got too bloated.  moved to microsoft security essentials
> based on suggestions from this list.
>
>
>
> - Original Message -
>
> *From:* Steve Jones 
>
> *To:* af@afmug.com
>
> *Sent:* Tuesday, April 11, 2017 9:55 AM
>
> *Subject:* [AFMUG] Thoughts on Kaspersky
>
>
>
> We are a symantec endpoint shop for our contract customers, but they do
> not offer a mobile client package.
>
> Kaspersky does. Ive always liked their products, seem effective, slightly
> less cumbersome to a system than the SEP. The only downside is full
> protection tends to cause a 20-30 percent decrease in network throughput in
> its default scan state, I assume that can be remedied with some
> configuration changes.
>
>
>
> My largest concern is its a Russian cyber-security entity, this does make
> me somewhat cautious. Ive never read any negative about their
> "trustability" in regard to their home region. If anything else, I would
> suspect they have greater access to source code for generating definition
> libraries.
>
>
>
> Anyone here ever deployed any of their SMB/Corporate solution?
>
>

Re: [AFMUG] Thoughts on Kaspersky

[Mike Hammett]

MS is the best all-around AV out there. 




- 
Mike Hammett 
Intelligent Computing Solutions 

Midwest Internet Exchange 

The Brothers WISP 




- Original Message -

From: "CBB - Jay Fuller"  
To: af@afmug.com 
Sent: Tuesday, April 11, 2017 10:24:02 AM 
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Thoughts on Kaspersky 



I have deployed a symantec endpoint solution. client dropped it a few years ago 
cause it got too bloated. moved to microsoft security essentials based on 
suggestions from this list. 



- Original Message - 
From: Steve Jones 
To: af@afmug.com 
Sent: Tuesday, April 11, 2017 9:55 AM 
Subject: [AFMUG] Thoughts on Kaspersky 


We are a symantec endpoint shop for our contract customers, but they do not 
offer a mobile client package. 
Kaspersky does. Ive always liked their products, seem effective, slightly less 
cumbersome to a system than the SEP. The only downside is full protection tends 
to cause a 20-30 percent decrease in network throughput in its default scan 
state, I assume that can be remedied with some configuration changes. 


My largest concern is its a Russian cyber-security entity, this does make me 
somewhat cautious. Ive never read any negative about their "trustability" in 
regard to their home region. If anything else, I would suspect they have 
greater access to source code for generating definition libraries. 


Anyone here ever deployed any of their SMB/Corporate solution? 

Re: [AFMUG] Thoughts on Kaspersky

[Rory Conaway]

Security Essentials couldn’t catch a butterfly with a tent sized net and at 
this point is a joke.   Magazines don’t even both testing it any longer against 
real products.  When it couldn’t’ catch 50% of the viruses when everyone else 
was above 70% to 100%, they gave up.  Kapersky can’t be used like Lenovo for 
anything governmental because the entire Eastern Block has access to it.   
Symantec, although one of the best, is constantly being penetrated by porn 
sites (we have many field testers as clients).  The best combination so far 
that we have found is Symantec supplemented by Malwarebytes full version.  At 
the head end, Barracuda Web Gateway devices have Malwarebytes signatures among 
other things.

Rory

From: Af [mailto:af-boun...@afmug.com] On Behalf Of CBB - Jay Fuller
Sent: Tuesday, April 11, 2017 8:24 AM
To: af@afmug.com
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Thoughts on Kaspersky


I have deployed a symantec endpoint solution.  client dropped it a few years 
ago cause it got too bloated.  moved to microsoft security essentials based on 
suggestions from this list.

- Original Message -
From: Steve Jones
To: af@afmug.com
Sent: Tuesday, April 11, 2017 9:55 AM
Subject: [AFMUG] Thoughts on Kaspersky

We are a symantec endpoint shop for our contract customers, but they do not 
offer a mobile client package.
Kaspersky does. Ive always liked their products, seem effective, slightly less 
cumbersome to a system than the SEP. The only downside is full protection tends 
to cause a 20-30 percent decrease in network throughput in its default scan 
state, I assume that can be remedied with some configuration changes.

My largest concern is its a Russian cyber-security entity, this does make me 
somewhat cautious. Ive never read any negative about their "trustability" in 
regard to their home region. If anything else, I would suspect they have 
greater access to source code for generating definition libraries.

Anyone here ever deployed any of their SMB/Corporate solution?

Re: [AFMUG] Thoughts on Kaspersky

[CBB - Jay Fuller]

I have deployed a symantec endpoint solution.  client dropped it a few years 
ago cause it got too bloated.  moved to microsoft security essentials based on 
suggestions from this list.

  - Original Message - 
  From: Steve Jones 
  To: af@afmug.com 
  Sent: Tuesday, April 11, 2017 9:55 AM
  Subject: [AFMUG] Thoughts on Kaspersky


  We are a symantec endpoint shop for our contract customers, but they do not 
offer a mobile client package.
  Kaspersky does. Ive always liked their products, seem effective, slightly 
less cumbersome to a system than the SEP. The only downside is full protection 
tends to cause a 20-30 percent decrease in network throughput in its default 
scan state, I assume that can be remedied with some configuration changes.


  My largest concern is its a Russian cyber-security entity, this does make me 
somewhat cautious. Ive never read any negative about their "trustability" in 
regard to their home region. If anything else, I would suspect they have 
greater access to source code for generating definition libraries.


  Anyone here ever deployed any of their SMB/Corporate solution?

Re: [AFMUG] Non pilot drone license for commercial use?

[Paul McCall]

Thank you.  Will check out that site

From: Af [mailto:af-boun...@afmug.com] On Behalf Of Dan Petermann
Sent: Monday, April 10, 2017 7:11 PM
To: af@afmug.com
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Non pilot drone license for commercial use?

I got mine about a month ago.

They recommend studying about 5-6 weeks before taking the test. I did it in 
considerably less time but I am good at taking tests so your mileage may vary.

Go here, sign up and download everything: https://jrupprechtlaw.com
There are a few other websites that I can't remember right now but the one 
above is the best.

Study the airspace classifications, map symbols, and especially the 
aeronautical charts. The majority of my test was about these 3 subjects.

Safety hazards and attitudes, know these.

Test is 60 questions with 2 hours to answer.


On Apr 9, 2017, at 8:00 PM, Paul McCall 
> wrote:


Any non-pilots here that have gotten their license to use their drone for 
commercial purposes?

Interested in your experience, your studying and the test, etc.

Paul

Paul McCall, President
PDMNet, Inc. / Florida Broadband, Inc.
658 Old Dixie Highway
Vero Beach, FL 32962
772-564-6800
pa...@pdmnet.net
www.pdmnet.com
www.floridabroadband.com

Re: [AFMUG] distributor for RF elements horns

[Paul McCall]

Yes, we buy from Epcom quite a bit

From: Af [mailto:af-boun...@afmug.com] On Behalf Of Jaime Solorza
Sent: Monday, April 10, 2017 1:40 PM
To: Animal Farm 
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] distributor for RF elements horns

Epcom has Miami location..

On Apr 10, 2017 9:48 AM, "Paul McCall" 
> wrote:
Where do we buy these critters?

Baltic didn’t list the UltraHorns, not seeing them on anyone’s site.

https://www.rfelements.com/products/wireless-broadband/ultrahorn-point-to-point-antennas/overview/



Paul McCall, President
PDMNet, Inc. / Florida Broadband, Inc.
658 Old Dixie Highway
Vero Beach, FL 32962
772-564-6800
pa...@pdmnet.net
www.pdmnet.com
www.floridabroadband.com

Re: [AFMUG] Thoughts on Kaspersky

[Jaime Solorza]

Nyet comradeI would be cautious...So much danger out there now

On Apr 11, 2017 8:55 AM, "Steve Jones"  wrote:

> We are a symantec endpoint shop for our contract customers, but they do
> not offer a mobile client package.
> Kaspersky does. Ive always liked their products, seem effective, slightly
> less cumbersome to a system than the SEP. The only downside is full
> protection tends to cause a 20-30 percent decrease in network throughput in
> its default scan state, I assume that can be remedied with some
> configuration changes.
>
> My largest concern is its a Russian cyber-security entity, this does make
> me somewhat cautious. Ive never read any negative about their
> "trustability" in regard to their home region. If anything else, I would
> suspect they have greater access to source code for generating definition
> libraries.
>
> Anyone here ever deployed any of their SMB/Corporate solution?
>

[AFMUG] Thoughts on Kaspersky

[Steve Jones]

We are a symantec endpoint shop for our contract customers, but they do not
offer a mobile client package.
Kaspersky does. Ive always liked their products, seem effective, slightly
less cumbersome to a system than the SEP. The only downside is full
protection tends to cause a 20-30 percent decrease in network throughput in
its default scan state, I assume that can be remedied with some
configuration changes.

My largest concern is its a Russian cyber-security entity, this does make
me somewhat cautious. Ive never read any negative about their
"trustability" in regard to their home region. If anything else, I would
suspect they have greater access to source code for generating definition
libraries.

Anyone here ever deployed any of their SMB/Corporate solution?

[AFMUG] powering a PTP650

[Paul McCall]

What are the options for powering these up?

Curious to see if I can power off a CMM4, or UBNT S16, etc.

Paul

Paul McCall, President
PDMNet, Inc. / Florida Broadband, Inc.
658 Old Dixie Highway
Vero Beach, FL 32962
772-564-6800
pa...@pdmnet.net
www.pdmnet.com
www.floridabroadband.com