[AFMUG] Would like a 430 connectorized AP (and possibly a 320 too).

2015-07-07 Thread Forrest Christian (List Account)
I'm currently in the market for an additional 430 and/or 320 AP for testing
purposes here.  They need to be connectorized, as I will be using them for
sync compatibility testing by connecting them to a RF detector and
observing the actual TX transmission timing in relation to the input
synchronization pulses.

Because I consider my 320/430 sync products to be nearing their end of life
(just due to the fact that we don't sell a lot more), I'm not willing to
pay an enormous amount for them.   These will only be used on the bench
here, so ones that are cosmetically unacceptable but still work are
perfectly acceptable here.

Send me a email off-list if you have one or both types floating around.

-- 
*Forrest Christian* *CEO**, PacketFlux Technologies, Inc.*
Tel: 406-449-3345 | Address: 3577 Countryside Road, Helena, MT 59602
forre...@imach.com | http://www.packetflux.com
http://www.linkedin.com/in/fwchristian  http://facebook.com/packetflux
http://twitter.com/@packetflux


Re: [AFMUG] Would like a 430 connectorized AP (and possibly a 320 too).

2015-07-07 Thread Chuck McCown
You can put a probe and crystal detector in front of them and get RF that way 
without connectorizing them.
1/4 wave probe and detector on a scope cable.  

From: Forrest Christian (List Account) 
Sent: Tuesday, July 07, 2015 1:29 AM
To: af 
Subject: [AFMUG] Would like a 430 connectorized AP (and possibly a 320 too).

I'm currently in the market for an additional 430 and/or 320 AP for testing 
purposes here.  They need to be connectorized, as I will be using them for sync 
compatibility testing by connecting them to a RF detector and observing the 
actual TX transmission timing in relation to the input synchronization pulses.


Because I consider my 320/430 sync products to be nearing their end of life 
(just due to the fact that we don't sell a lot more), I'm not willing to pay an 
enormous amount for them.   These will only be used on the bench here, so ones 
that are cosmetically unacceptable but still work are perfectly acceptable here.


Send me a email off-list if you have one or both types floating around.


-- 

  Forrest Christian CEO, PacketFlux Technologies, Inc.

  Tel: 406-449-3345 | Address: 3577 Countryside Road, Helena, MT 59602
  forre...@imach.com | http://www.packetflux.com

 




Re: [AFMUG] Would like a 430 connectorized AP (and possibly a 320 too).

2015-07-07 Thread Sean Heskett
Witchcraft!



On Tuesday, July 7, 2015, Chuck McCown ch...@wbmfg.com wrote:

   You can put a probe and crystal detector in front of them and get RF
 that way without connectorizing them.
 1/4 wave probe and detector on a scope cable.

  *From:* Forrest Christian (List Account)
 javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','li...@packetflux.com');
 *Sent:* Tuesday, July 07, 2015 1:29 AM
 *To:* af javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','af@afmug.com');
 *Subject:* [AFMUG] Would like a 430 connectorized AP (and possibly a 320
 too).

   I'm currently in the market for an additional 430 and/or 320 AP for
 testing purposes here.  They need to be connectorized, as I will be using
 them for sync compatibility testing by connecting them to a RF detector and
 observing the actual TX transmission timing in relation to the input
 synchronization pulses.

 Because I consider my 320/430 sync products to be nearing their end of
 life (just due to the fact that we don't sell a lot more), I'm not willing
 to pay an enormous amount for them.   These will only be used on the bench
 here, so ones that are cosmetically unacceptable but still work are
 perfectly acceptable here.

 Send me a email off-list if you have one or both types floating around.

 --
 *Forrest Christian* *CEO**, PacketFlux Technologies, Inc.*
 Tel: 406-449-3345 | Address: 3577 Countryside Road, Helena, MT 59602
 forre...@imach.com javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','forre...@imach.com'); |
 http://www.packetflux.com
  http://www.linkedin.com/in/fwchristian
 http://facebook.com/packetflux  http://twitter.com/@packetflux