Re: [AFMUG] RackMount PacketFlux PowerInjector+Sync

2016-03-11 Thread Forrest Christian (List Account)
See the 26-Aug-2015 release here: http://tickets.packetflux.com/kb/faq.php?id=4 -forrest On Fri, Mar 11, 2016 at 3:43 PM, Matt wrote: > We use EZ-cat connectors. Often when plugging in the connector we briefly > short it out on the metal of RJ45 jack. It would

Re: [AFMUG] RackMount PacketFlux PowerInjector+Sync

2016-03-11 Thread Matt
We use EZ-cat connectors. Often when plugging in the connector we briefly short it out on the metal of RJ45 jack. It would be nice if the current trip would auto reset to. Really looking forward to this product. I think you should skip WispaAmerica and stay home and work on it. Lol. On Fri,

Re: [AFMUG] RackMount PacketFlux PowerInjector+Sync

2016-03-11 Thread Forrest Christian (List Account)
It will most likely have 4 power buses assuming I don't run out of mechanical room - 2 for certain. Max 12A per bus. (So you can only power 12 airfibers per bus, sorry...) You will be able to jumper which bus(es) you will use on each port. And my intent is to set it up so if you jumper more

Re: [AFMUG] RackMount PacketFlux PowerInjector+Sync

2016-03-10 Thread Matt
Say I have it powering 24 and 48 volt devices. Will it have dual inputs, 24 and 48 or will it just have 48 volt input? Do you need beta testers? This will really clean up some of my busy sites. On Tue, Mar 8, 2016 at 1:40 PM, Forrest Christian (List Account) < li...@packetflux.com> wrote: >

Re: [AFMUG] RackMount PacketFlux PowerInjector+Sync

2016-03-09 Thread Forrest Christian (List Account)
lto:af-boun...@afmug.com] *On Behalf Of *Forrest Christian > (List Account) > *Sent:* Tuesday, March 08, 2016 3:04 PM > *To:* af > *Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] RackMount PacketFlux PowerInjector+Sync > > > > Yep, pretty much anything you mentioned. Anything which will work with a > pas

Re: [AFMUG] RackMount PacketFlux PowerInjector+Sync

2016-03-09 Thread Forrest Christian (List Account)
Well, my memory apparently wasn't all that faulty This is close enough that unless you're running this in a very hot cabinet they should work. On Tue, Mar 8, 2016 at 9:49 PM, George Skorup wrote: > I believe the max spec for the Lumina HP is about 55 watts. Slightly more

Re: [AFMUG] RackMount PacketFlux PowerInjector+Sync

2016-03-09 Thread Forrest Christian (List Account)
If those are the ones which use standard PoE, they should. The question being the wattage. I think some of them are about 55W. The magnetics I use are rated 1A total across the magnetic. But that's at high temperatures. If they're just over 1A (aka 48W@48V or 56W@56V, you should be fine).

Re: [AFMUG] RackMount PacketFlux PowerInjector+Sync

2016-03-09 Thread SmarterBroadband
Yep, we use those for POEs held down with zip ties. From: Af [mailto:af-boun...@afmug.com] On Behalf Of Eric Kuhnke Sent: Tuesday, March 08, 2016 1:13 PM To: af@afmug.com Subject: Re: [AFMUG] RackMount PacketFlux PowerInjector+Sync The great thing about those ventilated shallow rack

Re: [AFMUG] RackMount PacketFlux PowerInjector+Sync

2016-03-09 Thread George Skorup
:*Af [mailto:af-boun...@afmug.com] *On Behalf Of *Forrest Christian (List Account) *Sent:* Tuesday, March 08, 2016 3:04 PM *To:* af *Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] RackMount PacketFlux PowerInjector+Sync Yep, pretty much anything you mentioned. Anything which will work with a passive power injector

Re: [AFMUG] RackMount PacketFlux PowerInjector+Sync

2016-03-09 Thread Darren Shea
, 2016 3:04 PM To: af Subject: Re: [AFMUG] RackMount PacketFlux PowerInjector+Sync Yep, pretty much anything you mentioned. Anything which will work with a passive power injector. Notable exceptions: Cambium 320/430 radios (oddly pinned power not compatible with a true gigabit radio

Re: [AFMUG] RackMount PacketFlux PowerInjector+Sync

2016-03-09 Thread Chuck McCown
There are other injectors that will power a SAF. From: George Skorup Sent: Tuesday, March 08, 2016 9:49 PM To: af@afmug.com Subject: Re: [AFMUG] RackMount PacketFlux PowerInjector+Sync I believe the max spec for the Lumina HP is about 55 watts. Slightly more than an AF24 at 50 watts (@ 50V

Re: [AFMUG] RackMount PacketFlux PowerInjector+Sync

2016-03-08 Thread George Skorup
I believe the max spec for the Lumina HP is about 55 watts. Slightly more than an AF24 at 50 watts (@ 50V). Maybe 56V would bring the current down a little. Forrest did say 1A max per port, which would be right on the edge for the AF24. So there has to be a little wiggle room in there.

Re: [AFMUG] RackMount PacketFlux PowerInjector+Sync

2016-03-08 Thread That One Guy /sarcasm
The standard packetflux daisy chain capability is a must. Let us add existing joints to the assembly brother. And also that blank mount for the guts of the r port existing, and the packetflux screwdiverz, and popcorn, and a pony that poops out unicorns On Mar 8, 2016 5:44 PM, "George Skorup"

Re: [AFMUG] RackMount PacketFlux PowerInjector+Sync

2016-03-08 Thread That One Guy /sarcasm
Tell me too On Mar 8, 2016 7:35 PM, "Matt" wrote: > Do your gigabit injectors work with SAF Lumina? > > > On Tue, Mar 8, 2016 at 3:03 PM, Forrest Christian (List Account) < > li...@packetflux.com> wrote: > >> Yep, pretty much anything you mentioned. Anything which

Re: [AFMUG] RackMount PacketFlux PowerInjector+Sync

2016-03-08 Thread Brandon Yuchasz
www.gogebicrange.net <http://www.gogebicrange.net/> From: Af [mailto:af-boun...@afmug.com] On Behalf Of Matt Sent: Tuesday, March 08, 2016 7:36 PM To: af@afmug.com Subject: Re: [AFMUG] RackMount PacketFlux PowerInjector+Sync Do your gigabit injectors work with SAF Lumina? On Tu

Re: [AFMUG] RackMount PacketFlux PowerInjector+Sync

2016-03-08 Thread Matt
Do your gigabit injectors work with SAF Lumina? On Tue, Mar 8, 2016 at 3:03 PM, Forrest Christian (List Account) < li...@packetflux.com> wrote: > Yep, pretty much anything you mentioned. Anything which will work with a > passive power injector. Notable exceptions: Cambium 320/430 radios >

Re: [AFMUG] RackMount PacketFlux PowerInjector+Sync

2016-03-08 Thread George Skorup
What we have at most sites is a SiteMonitor Base and an injector or two of some time. A couple old 4 ports, an 8 port, or a 4 port + SyncInjector, etc. So a "couple" expansion modules is probably enough in most cases. A few newer sites have the 5ch PDUs + 2 relay / 3 switch. One site has the

Re: [AFMUG] RackMount PacketFlux PowerInjector+Sync

2016-03-08 Thread Eric Kuhnke
The great thing about those ventilated shallow rack shelves is that you can aggressively ziptie stuff down onto them, to keep it in place even when cables are pushed/pulled/wiggled, connected and disconnected. On Tue, Mar 8, 2016 at 12:59 PM, That One Guy /sarcasm < thatoneguyst...@gmail.com>

Re: [AFMUG] RackMount PacketFlux PowerInjector+Sync

2016-03-08 Thread Forrest Christian (List Account)
Yep, pretty much anything you mentioned. Anything which will work with a passive power injector. Notable exceptions: Cambium 320/430 radios (oddly pinned power not compatible with a true gigabit radio), and other radios which try to do everything across the eight pairs and end up breaking

Re: [AFMUG] RackMount PacketFlux PowerInjector+Sync

2016-03-08 Thread Forrest Christian (List Account)
I could buy them from amazon, bundle them, and sell them to you with a nice markup for me ;) On Tue, Mar 8, 2016 at 1:59 PM, That One Guy /sarcasm < thatoneguyst...@gmail.com> wrote: > ha, thats funny, because those two exact products is what we are using > where we dont have DIN, > > > >

Re: [AFMUG] RackMount PacketFlux PowerInjector+Sync

2016-03-08 Thread That One Guy /sarcasm
unless theres exposed components that could easily be damaged, would there need to be a cover? These are intended to be in an an enclosure? If you could get these pressed in such a way that the housin would hold the APC blanks for the WB cards, I think at this point we all have 2.3 billion of

Re: [AFMUG] RackMount PacketFlux PowerInjector+Sync

2016-03-08 Thread Forrest Christian (List Account)
Oh, I don't think I finished replying to this one... if it's a dup, just ignore this reply or the other one... My intent is to build this with a standalone web interface and a SNMP MIB which is designed for this device. This should enable a bit easier management. I may consider adding an

Re: [AFMUG] RackMount PacketFlux PowerInjector+Sync

2016-03-08 Thread Matt
Leave them open. If it really bothers someone there is wide black tape. On Tue, Mar 8, 2016 at 2:39 PM, Forrest Christian (List Account) < li...@packetflux.com> wrote: > I'm thinking about this as an option. The question then becomes what to > do with the empty holes? > > > > On Tue, Mar 8,

Re: [AFMUG] RackMount PacketFlux PowerInjector+Sync

2016-03-08 Thread That One Guy /sarcasm
ha, thats funny, because those two exact products is what we are using where we dont have DIN, On Tue, Mar 8, 2016 at 2:34 PM, Forrest Christian (List Account) < li...@packetflux.com> wrote: > How about one of these: > http://www.amazon.com/Raxxess-RAX-Unitray-Universal-Rack/dp/B0007OGTGS > >

Re: [AFMUG] RackMount PacketFlux PowerInjector+Sync

2016-03-08 Thread Chuck McCown
rch 08, 2016 11:41 AM To: af <af@afmug.com> Subject: [AFMUG] RackMount PacketFlux PowerInjector+Sync Well, it looks like it might actually be finally happening. We are about 98% sure we have a rackmount enclosure manufacturer which we can work with. Domestic. Product looks de

Re: [AFMUG] RackMount PacketFlux PowerInjector+Sync

2016-03-08 Thread Forrest Christian (List Account)
redltd.com > > > > *From:* Af [mailto:af-boun...@afmug.com] *On Behalf Of *Forrest Christian > (List Account) > *Sent:* Tuesday, March 08, 2016 11:41 AM > *To:* af <af@afmug.com> > *Subject:* [AFMUG] RackMount PacketFlux PowerInjector+Sync > > > > We

Re: [AFMUG] RackMount PacketFlux PowerInjector+Sync

2016-03-08 Thread George Skorup
Popcorn! On 3/8/2016 2:46 PM, Jeremy wrote: A blank cover plate? On Tue, Mar 8, 2016 at 1:39 PM, Forrest Christian (List Account) > wrote: I'm thinking about this as an option. The question then becomes what to do with the empty

Re: [AFMUG] RackMount PacketFlux PowerInjector+Sync

2016-03-08 Thread Forrest Christian (List Account)
Which involves bending, cutting, providing a mounting method, and so on. It's amazing how much a little piece of metal will cost. But yeah, that's what I'm thinking if I go down that path. On Tue, Mar 8, 2016 at 1:46 PM, Jeremy wrote: > A blank cover plate? > > On

Re: [AFMUG] RackMount PacketFlux PowerInjector+Sync

2016-03-08 Thread Jeremy
A blank cover plate? On Tue, Mar 8, 2016 at 1:39 PM, Forrest Christian (List Account) < li...@packetflux.com> wrote: > I'm thinking about this as an option. The question then becomes what to > do with the empty holes? > > > > On Tue, Mar 8, 2016 at 1:15 PM, Roland Houin

Re: [AFMUG] RackMount PacketFlux PowerInjector+Sync

2016-03-08 Thread Forrest Christian (List Account)
I'm thinking about this as an option. The question then becomes what to do with the empty holes? On Tue, Mar 8, 2016 at 1:15 PM, Roland Houin wrote: > how about selling unit with 1 module set & allow us to expand to full > capacity. > that way I can standardize even small

Re: [AFMUG] RackMount PacketFlux PowerInjector+Sync

2016-03-08 Thread Forrest Christian (List Account)
How about one of these: http://www.amazon.com/Raxxess-RAX-Unitray-Universal-Rack/dp/B0007OGTGS And a roll of this: http://www.amazon.com/Velcro-Products-Industrial-Sticky-Back-positioning/dp/B004E2IADO On Tue, Mar 8, 2016 at 1:09 PM, That One Guy /sarcasm < thatoneguyst...@gmail.com> wrote: > I

Re: [AFMUG] RackMount PacketFlux PowerInjector+Sync

2016-03-08 Thread Peter Kranz
7- <mailto:pkr...@unwiredltd.com> pkr...@unwiredltd.com From: Af [mailto:af-boun...@afmug.com] On Behalf Of Forrest Christian (List Account) Sent: Tuesday, March 08, 2016 11:41 AM To: af <af@afmug.com> Subject: [AFMUG] RackMount PacketFlux PowerInjector+Sync Well, it looks like

Re: [AFMUG] RackMount PacketFlux PowerInjector+Sync

2016-03-08 Thread Paul McCall
+1 -Original Message- From: Af [mailto:af-boun...@afmug.com] On Behalf Of Roland Houin Sent: Tuesday, March 08, 2016 3:16 PM To: afmug Subject: Re: [AFMUG] RackMount PacketFlux PowerInjector+Sync how about selling unit with 1 module set & allow us to expand to full capacity. that w

Re: [AFMUG] RackMount PacketFlux PowerInjector+Sync

2016-03-08 Thread George Skorup
I could go either way. 4x4 for 16 or 6x3 for 18. More ports is always cool. I guess whatever makes the most sense to you would be fine with me. This really comes down to being able to power just about anything imaginable... except for Trango's crazy licensed POE scheme, power consumption and

Re: [AFMUG] RackMount PacketFlux PowerInjector+Sync

2016-03-08 Thread Roland Houin
how about selling unit with 1 module set & allow us to expand to full capacity. that way I can standardize even small sites, which can grow.. Roland > Well, it looks like it might actually be finally happening. We are about 98% sure we have a rackmount enclosure manufacturer which we can work

Re: [AFMUG] RackMount PacketFlux PowerInjector+Sync

2016-03-08 Thread That One Guy /sarcasm
I can tell you if you had a 1U or 2U blank that we could pull the guts from our existing 4 port syncinjectors, and a single blank for the guts of a sitemnitor, and sold the existing 4 port injectors with a spare sticker, id be pig in shit happy. If you had that, Id still pay the current cost of

[AFMUG] RackMount PacketFlux PowerInjector+Sync

2016-03-08 Thread Forrest Christian (List Account)
Well, it looks like it might actually be finally happening. We are about 98% sure we have a rackmount enclosure manufacturer which we can work with. Domestic. Product looks decent. Price is right. Which means it's time to nail down a few details here, such as number of ports, so I can get some