Re: [agi] open source AGI effort

Matt: "When you put millions of these specialists together you have AGI." No you don't Says who? (1) Where's the proof? (2) Where's the principle that suggests it? You have neither of these things. Even if you had both these things you'd still have to build AGI and test it assuming they are f

Re: [agi] open source AGI effort

OpenCog is one open source effort. But real progress in AI like Google, Siri, Alexa etc. is not just software. It's hundreds of petabytes of data from the 4 billion people on the internet and the millions of CPUs needed to process it. It's not just something you could download and run. I realize i

Re: [agi] open source AGI effort

If God in his infinite wisdom also made Mentifex, so who are we to question? =) On Sat, 23 Feb 2019 at 23:37, justcamel wrote: > Either this guy is using 3 alter egos to spam the list with stuff > regarding his programmatical horse shit or people are just that > ill-equipped ... > > For the pas

Re: [agi] open source AGI effort

Either this guy is using 3 alter egos to spam the list with stuff regarding his programmatical horse shit or people are just that ill-equipped ... For the past 30 years, I have done everything from writing carrier grade provisioning systems to reverse engineering computer games and writing "a

Re: [agi] Some thoughts about Symbols and Symbol Nets

In other words...the purpose should be functional RNA. Now, is an AGI blueprint justified? https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gene_regulatory_network [https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/c/c4/Gene_Regulatory_Network.jpg]

Re: [agi] open source AGI effort

Ah, they sell the dataset: https://www.existor.com/products/cleverbot-data-for-machine-learning/ On Sat, 23 Feb 2019 at 21:01, Stefan Reich < stefan.reich.maker.of@googlemail.com> wrote: > > I would like to know why there isn't even an opensource Cleverbot effort. > > Are the original dialogs

Re: [agi] open source AGI effort

> I would like to know why there isn't even an opensource Cleverbot effort. Are the original dialogs from Cleverbot not open source? That is actually sad. > I know Mentiflex is widely touted as an open source AGI but most folks have problems with the source as written. You mean Mentifex? Uhm...

Re: [agi] open source AGI effort

http://ai.neocities.org/FirstWorkingAGI.html is the JavaScript tutorial version of an "open source AGI effort" composed of fifty mind-modules and able (in Perl) to think in English or Russian. The three open-source AGI Minds are capable of automated reasoning with logical inference. Each AGI uses c

Re: [agi] open source AGI effort

Cool. What is the github name? On 2/23/2019 12:34 PM, Stefan Reich via AGI wrote: I'm doing one. On Sat, 23 Feb 2019 at 18:33, Ed Pell mailto:edp...@optonline.net>> wrote: All, why is there no open source AGI effort? Ed Pell -- Stefan Reich BotCompany.de // Java-based operating systems *Art

Re: [agi] open source AGI effort

I would like to know why there isn't even an opensource Cleverbot effort. I think it would be a useful thing to have as a way to create pairs of input response chains. I have coded a simple one, but don't know why the data is not easily accessible for the original, as I can see how it would be a us

Re: [agi] open source AGI effort

I'm doing one. On Sat, 23 Feb 2019 at 18:33, Ed Pell wrote: > All, why is there no open source AGI effort? > > Ed Pell > -- Stefan Reich BotCompany.de // Java-based operating systems -- Artificial General Intelligence List: AGI Permalink: https://ag

[agi] open source AGI effort

All, why is there no open source AGI effort? Ed Pell -- Artificial General Intelligence List: AGI Permalink: https://agi.topicbox.com/groups/agi/T69c9e23ba6b51be9-Mf83a3bdaaddc10fb4ee4e7f6 Delivery options: https://agi.topicbox.com/groups/agi/subscriptio

Re: [agi] Re: For the ammusement of the Homunculus.

How do you do sentence parsing/knowledge storage/inference? I saw you can ask questions like "Can a hammer break glass". On Sat, 23 Feb 2019 at 17:39, korrelan wrote: > I tend to program in VB6 & WIN/API *NOT* VB.NET, it's really quick and > easy for prototyping and compiles to native code, with

Re: [agi] Re: For the ammusement of the Homunculus.

I tend to program in VB6 & WIN/API *NOT* VB.NET, it's really quick and easy for prototyping and compiles to native code, with all the optimizations on  it runs fast enough for this type of work.  If I require more speed I use C++ and create a DLL. -- Artif

Re: [agi] Some thoughts about Symbols and Symbol Nets

So now I am beginning to wonder if nano was talking about some kind of syntactic rules of combination for symbols and that all knowledge would have to 'emerge' by selection of which combination, within a network, were selected by learning. Jim Bromer On Fri, Feb 22, 2019 at 1:54 AM Nanograte Know

Re: [agi] Re: For the ammusement of the Homunculus.

What do you program this in? (Not the neural network, the other stuff, like this .) On Sat, 23 Feb 2019 at 13:19, korrelan wrote: > https://youtu.be/jrHT6Rx_y7s > > :) > *Artificial General Intelligence List * > / AGI

[agi] Re: For the ammusement of the Homunculus.

https://youtu.be/jrHT6Rx_y7s :) -- Artificial General Intelligence List: AGI Permalink: https://agi.topicbox.com/groups/agi/T9974b13cda814d12-M07a564afeec52c3a9b1084e8 Delivery options: https://agi.topicbox.com/groups/agi/subscription