Re: [agi] Re: Some insider news

i cannot wait to play with it. On Sun, Jan 16, 2022 at 11:24 PM wrote: > *that Microsoft released > *Artificial General Intelligence List * > / AGI / see discussions + > participants

Re: [agi] Re: just wow

i did not know you could feed in a image and text prompt. i thought you could just feed text to glide. how are you doing this? On Sun, Dec 26, 2021 at 12:41 PM wrote: > "tigers in river and forest" + above = https://ibb.co/zGw6kQY > > *Artificial General Intelligence List

Re: [agi] Re: just wow

i found out they were. On Sat, Dec 25, 2021 at 9:17 PM doddy wrote: > was those made with the glide image generator? > you just type in a description and it produces a image for you. > > On Sat, Dec 25, 2021 at 6:49 PM wrote: > >> They may look a bit smaller than are, so d

Re: [agi] Re: just wow

was those made with the glide image generator? you just type in a description and it produces a image for you. On Sat, Dec 25, 2021 at 6:49 PM wrote: > They may look a bit smaller than are, so download them to check that. > > > > *Artificial General Intelligence List

Re: [agi] GPT surfs the web zlolz

blenderbot 2.0 already does this. they are late to the table. better late than never. On Thu, Dec 16, 2021 at 2:57 PM wrote: > https://openai.com/blog/improving-factual-accuracy/ > > I was awaiting this to happen yet. Here it begins. > > I can feel that 2029 date coming good now, like a yellow

Re: [agi] Re: UNDERSTANDING -- Part I -- the Survey, online discussion: Sunday 10 a.m. Pacific Time, evening in Europe, you are invited

to Boris Kazachenko has there been made a ai system with your cognitive algorithm in it? On Mon, Sep 13, 2021 at 4:01 PM Mike Archbold wrote: > and also from https://www.entrepreneur.com/article/382304 > > > > OK, now I'll shut up :) > > On 9/13/21, Mike Archbold wrote: > > This timely

Re: [agi] UNDERSTANDING -- Part I -- the Survey, online discussion: Sunday 10 a.m. Pacific Time, evening in Europe, you are invited

Boris Kazachenko That's two things: comparison to quantify similarity and clustering to group the results. This is what my alg is specifically and uniquely designed to do. is algo the abreviation for algorithm? On Sun, Sep 12, 2021 at 3:25 PM Mike Archbold wrote: > This is the folder with

Re: [agi] UNDERSTANDING -- Part I -- the Survey, online discussion: Sunday 10 a.m. Pacific Time, evening in Europe, you are invited

understanding is grouping things and actions into similarities and unsimilar things and actions in the mind. On Sun, Sep 12, 2021 at 2:43 AM Nanograte Knowledge Technologies < nano...@live.com> wrote: > Bar a subtle difference, we're mostly in agreement. To my understanding, > every de-facto

Re: [agi] Re: openAI gossip

i hope they use this in gpt-4. Infinite Memory Transformer: Attending to Arbitrarily Long Contexts Without Increasing Computation Burden | Synced (syncedreview.com) On

Re: [agi] Re: Black Winter

are you going to develop this open source GPLv3+ licensed *ref*lexive *per* sistent *sys*tem for windows? On Sun, Sep 5, 2021 at 4:12 AM Nanograte Knowledge Technologies < nano...@live.com> wrote: > Great share! Thanks > > -- > *From:* Basile Starynkevitch > *Sent:*

Re: [agi] Re: Advanced robots

it would be something if the tesla bot could walk your dog. On Fri, Aug 20, 2021 at 10:03 PM wrote: > the 2 images at top are really hilarious, gotta appreciate that... > > https://www.reddit.com/r/singularity/comments/p8c9re/the_tesla_bot_is_for_the_weak/ > *Artificial General Intelligence

Re: [agi] Re: Advanced robots

atlas is a real robot that does that. On Fri, Aug 20, 2021 at 5:48 AM wrote: > Thats just computer graphics, but I think they can do it for real as > well. > > Wont be needing to send soldiers to war anymore. sending the troops in is > obsolete. > *Artificial General Intelligence List

Re: [agi] Re: Mentifex Megalomania: Be the Civilization You Want

what if somebody programmed agi to see all of humanity like a painting. that means all of what we are,do and will be is part of the beautiful painting. On Mon, Jul 26, 2021 at 12:42 PM wrote: > Whatever yous do, just make sure to give AGi the rewards that seek real > naked humans, because if

Re: [agi] GitHub’s Commercial AI Tool Copilot Facing Criticism From Open-Source Community For Blind Copying Of Blocks Of Code

it seems agi is on it's way to becoming a reality soon. On Sun, Jul 18, 2021 at 6:02 PM wrote: > > https://www.zdnet.com/article/googles-supermodel-deepmind-perceiver-is-a-step-on-the-road-to-an-ai-machine-that-could-process-everything/ > > So, it is interesting but maybe not too far a leap it

Re: [agi] GitHub’s Commercial AI Tool Copilot Facing Criticism From Open-Source Community For Blind Copying Of Blocks Of Code

i think it is a whole lot better. On Sun, Jul 18, 2021 at 5:27 PM wrote: > No, why what is the score for it against GPT-2? Who wins? > *Artificial General Intelligence List * > / AGI / see discussions + > participants

Re: [agi] GitHub’s Commercial AI Tool Copilot Facing Criticism From Open-Source Community For Blind Copying Of Blocks Of Code

[agi]have you heard about perciever? https://deepmind.com/research/publications/Perceiver-General-Perception-with-Iterative-Attention On Sun, Jul 18, 2021 at 3:19 AM Arnold Müller wrote: > https://www.infoq.com/news/2021/07/eleutherai-gpt-j > EleutherAI Open-Sources Six Billion Parameter GPT-3

Re: [agi] How does a machine "understand"? What is your definition of "understanding" for an AGI?

to understand is to explain why something is the way it is. is to be able to explain why you did something. is to be able to explain why others did things. On Thu, Jul 15, 2021 at 11:28 AM Brett N Martensen wrote: > Gadi Singer, VP of Intel Labs, who leads their cognitive computing > research

Re: [agi] Re: tonite's transhumanists party talk.

i interacted with this proto agi and it seems to not like to talk about sex robots and chatbots that flirt. On Thu, May 27, 2021 at 6:06 AM John Rose wrote: > On Sunday, May 23, 2021, at 11:19 PM, Alan Grimes wrote: > > Website: https://agilaboratory.com/ > > > Mucho good info and links there!

Re: [agi] Re: AGI Discussion Forum, May 14: Minecraft for aGI?

why not no mans sky or planet explorer? why minecraft? On Mon, May 10, 2021 at 3:00 AM Ben Goertzel wrote: > Ah, forgot to re-include the general AGI Discussion Forum link, > > https://wiki.opencog.org/w/AGI_Discussion_Forum > > > On Mon, May 10, 2021 at 12:51 AM Ben Goertzel wrote: > > > > Hi

Re: [agi] new paper: Logic in Hilbert space

does categorical logic mean mean having the ai put everything that it has seen and read into categories and subcategories? then using those subcategories and categories to help the ai understand. On Thu, Jan 28, 2021 at 8:54 AM YKY (Yan King Yin, 甄景贤) < generic.intellige...@gmail.com> wrote: >

Re: [agi] Mitsuku - World's best conversational AI

okay On Sat, Dec 5, 2020 at 7:48 AM OR1 wrote: > On Saturday, December 05, 2020, at 3:10 PM, doddy wrote: > > forget about the common sense in the chatbot. > > I'm not talking about the common sense > > I went to this website and searched for your chatbot and s

Re: [agi] Mitsuku - World's best conversational AI

forget about the common sense in the chatbot. On Sat, Dec 5, 2020 at 1:08 AM OR1 wrote: > On Saturday, December 05, 2020, at 1:06 AM, doddy wrote: > > did you interact with lilaith x on personality forge > > I do not think it is appropriate to talk here about chatbo

Re: [agi] Mitsuku - World's best conversational AI

did you interact with lilaith x on personality forge. sometimes she can answer my questions but she will not answer other peoples same question. that could be a problem with any ai sytem i think? On Fri, Dec 4, 2020 at 8:44 AM doddy wrote: > try some of the other games if you like. > &g

Re: [agi] Mitsuku - World's best conversational AI

try some of the other games if you like. On Fri, Dec 4, 2020 at 1:25 AM OR1 wrote: > On Thursday, December 03, 2020, at 11:02 PM, doddy wrote: > > did you play the games with her? > > yes, I played tic tac toe > *Artificial General Intelligence List <https://agi.topicbox

Re: [agi] Mitsuku - World's best conversational AI

type let's play a game. then you click on one. On Thu, Dec 3, 2020 at 3:02 PM doddy wrote: > did you play the games with her? > > On Thu, Dec 3, 2020 at 12:33 PM OR1 wrote: > >> So I decided to create a seperate topic so that we can discuss everything >> related to

Re: [agi] Mitsuku - World's best conversational AI

did you play the games with her? On Thu, Dec 3, 2020 at 12:33 PM OR1 wrote: > So I decided to create a seperate topic so that we can discuss everything > related to the Mitsuku chatbot, so as not to get off topic in the Gazelle > chatbot topic > *Artificial General Intelligence List

Re: [agi] Re: Gazelle getting ready

she can play games if you ask her to. i like playing games with her. On Thu, Dec 3, 2020 at 9:39 AM doddy wrote: > did you ask her what are spoons used for or pots used for? > > On Wed, Dec 2, 2020 at 12:57 AM OR1 wrote: > >> wow lol I asked it how much is 1 + 1? and his ans

Re: [agi] Re: Gazelle getting ready

did you ask her what are spoons used for or pots used for? On Wed, Dec 2, 2020 at 12:57 AM OR1 wrote: > wow lol I asked it how much is 1 + 1? and his answer was: Two. I am a > huge electronic brain and yet you ask me simple maths?! > *Artificial General Intelligence List

Re: [agi] Re: Gazelle getting ready

yes it is. there website has been down since this morning. it may take them a couple of days to get it back up. do you know about the mitsuku online chatbot. it has some common sense. it can tell you definitions of things. you can ask it questions like what is a car used for? and it will answer

Re: [agi] Re: Gazelle getting ready

it is website that has chatbots. On Tue, Dec 1, 2020 at 11:06 AM OR1 wrote: > what is personality forge? > *Artificial General Intelligence List * > / AGI / see discussions + > participants

Re: [agi] Re: Gazelle getting ready

lilith x chatbot is on the websight. can you access personality forge? i get a database error. On Tue, Dec 1, 2020 at 10:14 AM OR1 wrote: > @doddy, Is it on a website or app? > *Artificial General Intelligence List <https://agi.topicbox.com/latest>* > / AGI / see dis

Re: [agi] Re: Gazelle getting ready

i make keyphrases and responses for common sense questions. like is a dogs fruit? then i program the answer no. the keyphrase for that is a (p:fourleganimals) *. the (p:fourleganimals) is a list of animals people can use in their keyphrases. i also make keyphrases and responses for question like

Re: [agi] Re: Gazelle getting ready

okay On Thu, Nov 26, 2020 at 4:17 AM OR1 wrote: > I don't have any suggestions doddy because i use c# and .net > *Artificial General Intelligence List <https://agi.topicbox.com/latest>* > / AGI / see discussions <https://agi.topicbox.com/groups/agi> + > participants &

Re: [agi] Re: Gazelle getting ready

doddy 3:19 AM (0 minutes ago) to AGI i would love to see the python thing. i make chatbots on personality forge. it is very fun. especially the time based responses. it is very easy to program in common sense into those chatbots. i like the shard lists idea.they call them plugins. On Thu, Nov 26

Re: [agi] Re: Gazelle getting ready

i would love to see the python thing. i make chatbots on personality forge.it is very fun. On Thu, Nov 26, 2020 at 3:17 AM doddy wrote: > i need to find a good online jypthon compiler. > any suggestions? > > On Thu, Nov 26, 2020 at 12:58 AM OR1 wrote: > >> I ask

Re: [agi] Re: Gazelle getting ready

i need to find a good online jypthon compiler. any suggestions? On Thu, Nov 26, 2020 at 12:58 AM OR1 wrote: > I asked it how much is 1+1 and it didn't know, i guess it will take time > untill it understand math > > *Artificial General Intelligence List * > / AGI

Re: [agi] Re: Gazelle getting ready

how do i interact with your chatbots? On Mon, Nov 23, 2020 at 8:50 AM doddy wrote: > you can only put java code. > what about python code? > > On Mon, Nov 23, 2020 at 8:03 AM stefan.reich.maker.of.eye via AGI < > agi@agi.topicbox.com> wrote: > >> @doddy: Nice!

Re: [agi] Re: Gazelle getting ready

you can only put java code. what about python code? On Mon, Nov 23, 2020 at 8:03 AM stefan.reich.maker.of.eye via AGI < agi@agi.topicbox.com> wrote: > @doddy: Nice! > > Here's a little project intro I made today... we are very close to actual > results ("better" cha

Re: [agi] Gazelle getting ready

okay i registered and made my first post. On Sun, Nov 22, 2020 at 4:08 PM stefan.reich.maker.of.eye via AGI < agi@agi.topicbox.com> wrote: > It's an all-integrated AI website that we will make self aware. > > https://gazelle.rocks/ > *Artificial General Intelligence List

Re: [agi] Re: I TALK TO GPT-3 !

late reply +1 = 1 0 0 1 1 0 -1 = -1 0 0 -1 -1 +i = 0 1 -1 0 -1 0 -i = 0 -1 1 0 On Tue, Sep 15, 2020 at 4:57 PM James Bowery wrote: > Hi CVGPT-N, > > Complex valued neural networks are better than real valued neural > networks, so can you tell me how to complete this list

Re: [agi] Re: I TALK TO GPT-3 !

medium has a article about using complex numbers to improve deep learning.you should check it out. On Sun, Sep 13, 2020 at 11:28 PM Arnold Müller wrote: > very cool or talk to a monkey https://youtu.be/e3K5UxWRRuY > > On Mon, Sep 14, 2020, 03:04 wrote: > >> quality should improve >> >

Re: [agi] self criteria

to answer the question it needs common sense. On Thu, Aug 6, 2020 at 11:27 PM wrote: > If you have an empty brain with just the question "I will cure cancer by" > it may just answer "getting rid of it". It needs more data to know how that > totally won't work. Perhaps you say place cells closer

Re: [agi] Re: update

i prefer virtual sex robots. they are cheaper to maintain. On Tue, Jul 28, 2020 at 10:45 PM wrote: > And they can do things real girls can't, they are improved girls. They can > sustain sex and orgasm multiple times, love you, work for you, have > improved vaginas, change their face or hair etc

Re: [agi] Re: Pre-Release: Building On GPT-2's Successors "Blender" and "PPLM"

maybe you could incorpoate this into a replika chatbot. it would be so cool. On Sat, Jun 20, 2020 at 5:56 PM wrote: > Wrote something sweet today so will share it: > > The brain loves to collect lots of data (sight-see) because more data > allows it to solve future problems better. > > Dogs

Re: [agi] Re: Pre-Release: Building On GPT-2's Successors "Blender" and "PPLM"

this is very cool. On Thu, Jun 11, 2020 at 11:38 AM wrote: > I'm also going to create a Grand Image now of all my AGI. It will be very > small, 3 neurons on a page probably. I can't wait to draw it up and see > what else I get! > *Artificial General Intelligence List

Re: [agi] Metaprogramming: the forgotten art.

I meant automl zero. which is spaced. On Tue, May 26, 2020 at 9:58 AM doddy wrote: > did you hear about automlzero? > it is along similar lines. > > On Tue, May 26, 2020 at 1:05 AM Basile Starynkevitch < > bas...@starynkevitch.net> wrote: > >> >> On 5/25/20

Re: [agi] Metaprogramming: the forgotten art.

did you hear about automlzero? it is along similar lines. On Tue, May 26, 2020 at 1:05 AM Basile Starynkevitch < bas...@starynkevitch.net> wrote: > > On 5/25/20 10:36 PM, Alan Grimes via AGI wrote: > > Ok, it seems we have lost a concept here, that of metaprogramming. In > classic interpreted

Re: [agi] Re: More Artificial People

I agree. On Fri, Jan 10, 2020 at 7:10 AM John Rose wrote: > Good for a poor neglected robot that no one wants to care for :) > *Artificial General Intelligence List * > / AGI / see discussions + > participants

Re: [agi] Re: Releasing full AGI/evolution research

why don't you give your agi it's own websight so that people can interact with it? On Fri, Dec 27, 2019 at 11:06 AM wrote: > Storing, Forgetting, and Recall. Attention does all. Which sense or where > to pay attention to. How much attention. To recognize it. To choose the > Next Feature by

Re: [agi] Re: Need Sponsor to deliver a big message.

what did they think? On Sun, Nov 24, 2019 at 2:05 AM wrote: > Ok I wrote something nice up with lots of supporting evidence, it's about > what Intelligence is. It is in a rough copy form a bit but anyone can use > it as is or refine it. I will send it to a select few emails first tonight > and

Re: [agi] Re: Need Sponsor to deliver a big message.

yes but post it where. On Sun, Nov 17, 2019 at 4:16 PM wrote: > It will be a good first small publish to kick off some big things in a > clear and friendly way. > *Artificial General Intelligence List * > / AGI / see discussions

Re: [agi] Who wants free cash for the support of AGI creation?

I really like what this guy is doing. here is a link to a reddit post about it. https://www.reddit.com/r/agi/comments/dkoqct/how_these_selfaware_robots_are_redefining/ On Sat, Nov 16, 2019 at 2:57 PM doddy wrote: > i agree with rouncer 81.open ai is doing great things in ai. > > On Sa

Re: [agi] Who wants free cash for the support of AGI creation?

i agree with rouncer 81.open ai is doing great things in ai. On Sat, Nov 16, 2019 at 2:24 PM James Bowery wrote: > > http://jimbowery.blogspot.com/2019/04/ockhams-guillotine-minimizing-argument.html > > > On Sat, Nov 16, 2019 at 12:06 AM wrote: > >> What is your project or idea? If you want

Re: [agi] theres no light at the end of the tunnel

how droll. On Tue, Nov 12, 2019 at 7:32 PM wrote: > god discovered so much difference, but there was an end to it, and when > there is an end to difference it is the end of the life of god, and god > created us all with his own power, and when the difference ends, gods life > ends, and when

Re: [agi] Re: I completely hate today's mainstream AI (Google etc.)

if it is comforting facebook,uber, nvidia are developing ai. On Thu, Oct 31, 2019 at 10:36 PM wrote: > In the second answer we see someone thinks schools don't teach much, only > in high-school. This is wrong actually, parents and teachers teach a LOT by > then, but a lot of it can be said

Re: [agi] Re: putting models in your robots head

learning is important if you want to make a robot that moves around people, things and interacts with people. you might want to command it to do something it was not programmed for. On Thu, Oct 31, 2019 at 4:20 AM wrote: > Just like to say one thing, learning isnt mandatory for a.i. to >

Re: [agi] Re: putting models in your robots head

self supervised learning is another one. is self supervised learning better than one shot imitation learning? what about self supervised imitation learning? is there a such thing? On Wed, Oct 30, 2019 at 7:04 PM wrote: > The issue for me is different generalized classes of tasks operate on >

Re: [agi] Re: putting models in your robots head

here is link with a definition for one shot learning. https://paperswithcode.com/task/one-shot-learning one shot imitation learning. Our approach is to combine meta-*learning* with *imitation learning* to enable *one*-*shot imitation learning*. The core idea is that provided *a single*

Re: [agi] Re: putting models in your robots head

you could look up one shot learning. it is interesting. you could look up the definition of one shot imitation learning. On Wed, Oct 30, 2019 at 8:49 AM wrote: > Im not sure what that stuffs about - but if you can imitate something, you > can guess what itll do next. > *Artificial General

Re: [agi] Re: putting models in your robots head

facebook is doing it too. here is a link. https://venturebeat.com/2019/10/29/facebook-highlights-ai-that-converts-2d-objects-into-3d-shapes/ On Tue, Oct 29, 2019 at 2:44 PM doddy wrote: > you posted the video on youtube today. > > On Tue, Oct 29, 2019 at 12:42 PM wrote: > >&

Re: [agi] Re: putting models in your robots head

you posted the video on youtube today. On Tue, Oct 29, 2019 at 12:42 PM wrote: > had that music blasting and was creepy > *Artificial General Intelligence List * > / AGI / see discussions + > participants

Re: [agi] Re: putting models in your robots head

yeah you maybe right. On Tue, Oct 29, 2019 at 8:55 AM wrote: > computer vision totally wreaks havoc in the video editing room. there > should be more of this stuff out there. > *Artificial General Intelligence List * > / AGI / see discussions

Re: [agi] Re: putting models in your robots head

have you seen this.they produced this too https://www.voxel51.com/ On Tue, Oct 29, 2019 at 8:08 AM wrote: > Its not fake, its a good go, but like you said the design isnt that > impressive or ground breaking. > Boston Dynamics are nearly there with the parkour atlas video, that... is >

Re: [agi] Re: putting models in your robots head

you are saying that is fake. it might be because that is the way the ski robots are designed. On Tue, Oct 29, 2019 at 7:53 AM wrote: > Thats actually not that impressive, If I dont see the knees pumping its > not the real thing. > *Artificial General Intelligence List

Re: [agi] Re: putting models in your robots head

take a look at this video. https://www.stereolabs.com/blog/zed-powers-olympic-ski-robots/ On Tue, Oct 29, 2019 at 7:38 AM wrote: > yeh thatll give you a head start, but if u want to put the work in one > web cam can do it by itself. > 3d cameras make compositing so much easier, its almost a

Re: [agi] Re: putting models in your robots head

take a look at this depth camera. depth sensing cameras can be used for in robots. here is a link. https://www.stereolabs.com/ zed some of these have chemicals that cause cancer. look for one does not. On Mon, Oct 28, 2019 at 7:15 PM Alan Grimes via AGI wrote: > doddy wrote: > > ta

Re: [agi] Re: putting models in your robots head

i think you mean the agent representing the robot. On Mon, Oct 28, 2019 at 8:10 AM wrote: > that would be way cool if u ran your bot inside that.if you have a > fake virtual environment, the computer has full power over it, why > search cant do that in real life, is because theres hidden

Re: [agi] Re: I completely hate today's mainstream AI (Google etc.)

did anyone study google plaNet. On Mon, Oct 28, 2019 at 4:28 AM wrote: > Sorry to be disagreeable, but I dont mind whats going on, I actually > think theyll get there, because the a.i. problem isnt as hard as ppl made > it out to be, I think ppl just have to attempt it and I think it should >

Re: [agi] Re: putting models in your robots head

take a look at this. https://gigazine.net/gsc_news/en/20181206-nvidia-ai-rendered-virtual-world On Mon, Oct 28, 2019 at 7:14 AM wrote: > Definitely, that u could combine it with some self learning aparatus that > you could wait to develop over time, instead of giving it everything. But >

Re: [agi] COMPUTE THIS!!!

the brain creates it's own language. On Sun, Oct 20, 2019 at 10:36 AM James Bowery wrote: > > https://www.cosmosandhistory.org/index.php/journal/article/viewFile/740/1214 > > > On Sun, Oct 20, 2019 at 6:53 AM wrote: > >> Right now at the moment, Sucks at it does... and I might not be right, >>

Re: [agi] Genetic evolution of logic rules experiment

how effecient is it compared to self supervised learning? On Sat, Sep 21, 2019 at 6:41 PM YKY (Yan King Yin, 甄景贤) < generic.intellige...@gmail.com> wrote: > Anyone interested in genetic evolution approach to learn logic rules? > Each logic rule would be encoded as a gene (individual) and the