Exactly 10 commandments.
Nice one.
I am done.
-Original Message-
From: Alan Grimes alonz...@verizon.net
Sent: 14/05/2015 11:06 PM
To: AGI a...@listbox.com
Subject: [agi] EM fields thread.
I'm about three days away from formally requesting a killthread on this
EM fields crap.
1.
I'm about three days away from formally requesting a killthread on this
EM fields crap.
1. Electromagnetism has been Well Understood (tm) for about 140 years now.
2. By [nearly] all accounts, EM fields in the brain are secondary to its
operation.
3. Neural Science is a well established field that
Ben,
I don't know what Alan's problem is, but it appears he doesn't understand
forums in general, and this forum in particular.
As Alan's first objection to threads that has been running for several
days, Alan rises up to request that the subject be killed!!! This is absurd.
The whole purpose
+1 Dorian. Mark likes this.
On Thu, May 14, 2015 at 10:17 AM, Dorian Aur dorian...@gmail.com wrote:
We need to create an infrastructure e.g. the *Institute of General
Intelligence, *elect/appoint a board of directors to manage the entire
organization*.* Only a small fraction of
Dorian Aur wrote:
Here is the rationale:
a.Why use a digital computer to simulate/map or emulate the whole brain
• It cannot express all forms of computation that are built within
biological structure (see neuroelectrodynamics);
Evidence?
• Needs many megawatts to power the system (huge
We need to create an infrastructure e.g. the *Institute of General
Intelligence, *elect/appoint a board of directors to manage the entire
organization*.* Only a small fraction of funding that is currently
allocated for the BRAIN Initiative or Human Brain Project in EU would be
enough to
Colin,
Unfortunately you responded to this idiot before I had a chance. I suggest
reading my response.
EVERY forum has a village idiot. The total stupidity of this guy's posting
is plain for all to see. He obviously has some mental issues, as he
explains near the end of his posting. PLEASE don't
+100 to Dorian. Nailed it good.
Dorian is one of the few people that understands the difference between
'nature as computation' and the use of computers. Like me he merely wants to
solve the problem of AGI and can see another way. Read his book
Neuroelectrodynamics. I bought it and read it.
We are a good example of Intelligent beings, I mean in our point of view,
we are an awesome starting point of an instance of an intelligent being.
Being so it is quite logic to compare our conceptual models and/or approach
in AGI alongside our own inner models. And I think it will drive to a
Hmm, I guess that would leave me out, since I have no formal education.
Just 48 years at the school of hard knocks.
On Thu, May 14, 2015 at 5:09 PM, Dorian Aur dorian...@gmail.com wrote:
Excellent Colin!
We shall start with proposals for the board of directors. They will need
to make
On Thu, May 14, 2015 at 09:07:08AM -0400, Alan Grimes wrote:
I'm about three days away from formally requesting a killthread on this
EM fields crap.
10. I have some pretty strong hypothesii about how the brain works but
I'm frustrated by my inability to test those hypothesii for lack of a
Two questions, Two points of view, One problem
Why are computers less intelligent than us?
Why do we consider computers less intelligent than us?
Why are we focusing on creating computers with more functionality instead
of focusing on solving the problem of the hungry and other suffering from
Excellent Colin!
We shall start with proposals for the board of directors. They will need
to make strategic decisions and oversee the entire management of the
Institute. It should include , former academic, professional mentors and
retired executives from all connected areas:
a.Businesses
Dorian,
Lots of possible folk out there that might see the need for such an institute
that actually does something other than futurism and existential threat
analysis. Need a scope and mission too. One that enrolls all points of view and
concerns...
Will work on a doc.
In relation to
On Thu, May 14, 2015 at 10:17:11AM -0700, Dorian Aur wrote:
We need to create an infrastructure e.g. the *Institute of General
Intelligence, *elect/appoint a board of directors to manage the entire
organization*.* Only a small fraction of funding that is currently
allocated for the BRAIN
Felipe Carmona Miquilini wrote:
Two questions, Two points of view, One problem
Why are computers less intelligent than us?
Why do we consider computers less intelligent than us?
Why are we focusing on creating computers with more functionality
instead of focusing on solving the problem of
For those of you who don't already understand the Hall Effect, or its
potential computational value in neurons, I will attempt to explain this
WITHOUT references to obscure pysics or math you probably don't know.
When ANY charged particle travels through a magnetic field, its gets pushed
sideways
Dorian,
On Thu, May 14, 2015 at 5:09 PM, Dorian Aur dorian...@gmail.com wrote:
Excellent Colin!
We shall start with proposals for the board of directors. They will need
to make strategic decisions and oversee the entire management of the
Institute. It should include , former academic,
Hi Steve and all other longsuffering followers of this thread,
Warning... getting a bit ...erm... florid.
Let's see. We have brain tissue. Weird stuff, that. Universally recognised
as the most complex single chunk of matter in the known universe. And, oh
yeah, utterly unique in science now and
Colin
Thank you for responding. I understand the personal frustration with the system
and with us, but it would not change the selective realities of our future
world. The technology for making lives better for hundreds of millions of sick
persons in this world has existed for decades. Maybe
colin hales wrote:
Dorian,
Lots of possible folk out there that might see the need for such an
institute that actually does something other than futurism and
existential threat analysis. Need a scope and mission too. One that
enrolls all points of view and concerns...
Will work on a doc.
21 matches
Mail list logo
