Ben B) Even if there are only 5 applications of rules, the
Ben combinatorial explosion still exists. If there are 10 rules and
Ben 1 billlion knowledge items, then there may be up to 10 billion
Ben possibilities to consider in each inference step.
How do you respond to the 20-question argument
On 1/28/07, Eric Baum [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
How do you respond to the 20-question argument that there are only
of order 2^20 knowledge items ?
The granularity of knowledge items for 20 Questions and the number 20 are
specifically chosen to match each other, to make the game fair. While
Russell On 1/28/07, Eric Baum [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
How do you respond to the 20-question argument that there are only
of order 2^20 knowledge items ?
Russell The granularity of knowledge items for 20 Questions and the
Russell number 20 are specifically chosen to match each other, to
On 1/29/07, Eric Baum [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I haven't played 20 questions recently, but in response to your
comment I just went to www.20q.net and played thinking of Alice in
Wonderland, the book. The neural net guessed is it a novel on
question 22, and then decided it had gone far enough and
gts wrote:
Hi Ben,
On Extropy-chat, you and I and others were discussing the foundations
of probability theory, in particular the philosophical controversy
surrounding the so-called Principle of Indifference. Probability
theory is of course relevant to AGI because of its bearing on decision
On 1/28/07, Eric Baum [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Have you ever played 20 questions?
Yep.
In the games I've played,
Alice in Wonderland would be a fine topic. I admit its surprising
that one plays as well as one does.
Interesting, and surprising, but I don't draw the same conclusion as you
Ben,
Is the probabilistic logic you use in Novamente the same as Pei Wang's
version? If not, why do you use your version?
YKY
-
This list is sponsored by AGIRI: http://www.agiri.org/email
To unsubscribe or change your options, please go to:
http://v2.listbox.com/member/?list_id=303
To avoid confusion, I never refer to my multi-valued logic as a
version of probabilistic logic, though it has some
similarity/relationship with it. My reasons have been explained in
several papers, like
http://nars.wang.googlepages.com/wang.confidence.pdf , as well as my
book.
Pei
On 1/28/07,
Pei Wang's uncertain logic is **not** probabilistic, though it uses
frequency calculations
We have our own probabilistic logic theory called Probabilistic Logic
Networks (PLN), which will be described in a book to be released
toward the end of this year or the start of 2008.
The
Hi,
Well, Jaynes showed that the PI can be derived from another
assumption, right?: That equivalent states of information yield
equivalent probabilities
This seems to also be dealt with at the end of Cox's book The
Algebra of Probable Inference where he derives the standard entropy
10 matches
Mail list logo
