In short, instead of a pot of neurons, we might instead have a pot of
dozens of types of
neurons that each have their own complex rules regarding what other types
of neurons they
can connect to, and how they process information...
...there is plenty of evidence (from the slowness of
There is very little. Someone do research. Here is a paper on language
fitness.
http://kybele.psych.cornell.edu/~edelman/elcfinal.pdf
http://kybele.psych.cornell.edu/~edelman/elcfinal.pdfLSA is *not* discussed
nor is any fitness concept with the language itself. Similar sounding (or
written)
] Hutter - A fundamental misdirection?
In short, instead of a pot of neurons, we might instead have a pot of
dozens
of types of
neurons that each have their own complex rules regarding what other types of
neurons they
can connect to, and how they process information...
...there is plenty
On Mon, Jun 28, 2010 at 5:23 PM, Steve Richfield
steve.richfi...@gmail.comwrote:
Rob,
I just LOVE opaque postings, because they identify people who see things
differently than I do. I'm not sure what you are saying here, so I'll make
some random responses to exhibit my ignorance and elicit
Sorry, the link I included was invalid, this is what I meant:
http://www.geog.ucsb.edu/~raubal/Publications/RefConferences/ICSC_2009_AdamsRaubal_Camera-FINAL.pdf
On Tue, Jun 29, 2010 at 2:28 AM, rob levy r.p.l...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Jun 28, 2010 at 5:23 PM, Steve Richfield
The paper seems very similar in principle to LSA. What you need for a
concept vector (or position) is the application of LSA followed by K-Means
which will give you your concept clusters.
I would not knock Hutter too much. After all LSA reduces {primavera,
mamanthal, salsa, resorte} to one word
In order to have perceptual/conceptual similarity, it might make sense that
there is distance metric over conceptual spaces mapping (ala Gardenfors or
something like this theory) underlying how the experience of reasoning
through is carried out. This has the advantage of being motivated by
Rob,
I just LOVE opaque postings, because they identify people who see things
differently than I do. I'm not sure what you are saying here, so I'll make
some random responses to exhibit my ignorance and elicit more explanation.
On Mon, Jun 28, 2010 at 9:53 AM, rob levy r.p.l...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi Steve,
A few comments...
1)
Nobody is trying to implement Hutter's AIXI design, it's a mathematical
design intended as a proof of principle
2)
Within Hutter's framework, one calculates the shortest program that explains
the data, where shortest is measured on Turing machine M. Given a
Ben,
What I saw as my central thesis is that propagating carefully conceived
dimensionality information along with classical information could greatly
improve the cognitive process, by FORCING reasonable physics WITHOUT having
to understand (by present concepts of what understanding means)
Steve,
I know what dimensional analysis is, but it would be great if you could give
an example of how it's useful for everyday commonsense reasoning such as,
say, a service robot might need to do to figure out how to clean a house...
thx
ben
On Sun, Jun 27, 2010 at 6:43 PM, Steve Richfield
Ben,
On Sun, Jun 27, 2010 at 3:47 PM, Ben Goertzel b...@goertzel.org wrote:
know what dimensional analysis is, but it would be great if you could give
an example of how it's useful for everyday commonsense reasoning such as,
say, a service robot might need to do to figure out how to clean a
On Sun, Jun 27, 2010 at 7:09 PM, Steve Richfield
steve.richfi...@gmail.comwrote:
Ben,
On Sun, Jun 27, 2010 at 3:47 PM, Ben Goertzel b...@goertzel.org wrote:
know what dimensional analysis is, but it would be great if you could
give an example of how it's useful for everyday commonsense
13 matches
Mail list logo
