--- "J. Andrew Rogers" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> On Nov 27, 2007, at 7:21 PM, Matt Mahoney wrote:
> > As a counterexample, evolution is already smarter than
> > the human brain. It just takes more computing power. Evolution has
> > figured
> > out how to make humans out of simple chemic
On Nov 27, 2007, at 7:21 PM, Matt Mahoney wrote:
As a counterexample, evolution is already smarter than
the human brain. It just takes more computing power. Evolution has
figured
out how to make humans out of simple chemicals.
"figured out"? So if we implemented a planet kill, this "evo
--- Dennis Gorelik <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Matt,
>
> >> > As for the analogies, my point is that AGI will quickly evolve to
> >> invisibility from a human-level intelligence.
> >>
> >> I think you underestimate how quickly performance deteriorates with the
> >> growth of complexity.
> >> A
Mike,
>> I think you underestimate how quickly performance deteriorates with
>> the growth of complexity.
> Dennis, you are stating what could be potentially an extremely important
> principle.
It is very important principles for [hundreds of] years already.
Take a look into business. You can n
Matt,
>> > As for the analogies, my point is that AGI will quickly evolve to
>> invisibility from a human-level intelligence.
>>
>> I think you underestimate how quickly performance deteriorates with the
>> growth of complexity.
>> AGI systems would have lots of performance problems in spite of f