Steve Richfield said (regarding his Dr Eliza system):
I cannot see ANY argument that it is NOT novel AI. Certainly no one
expressed any such doubts at the WORLDCOMP conferences where it was
presented and demonstrated.
Maybe, but WORLDCOMP doesn't appear to be a particularly serious
Ben,
On 4/16/08, Benjamin Johnston [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Steve Richfield said (regarding his Dr Eliza system):
I cannot see ANY argument that it is NOT novel AI. Certainly no one
expressed any such doubts at the WORLDCOMP conferences where it was
presented and demonstrated.
Maybe,
Steve Josh,
You guys ought to get a kick out of this:
http://www.physorg.com:80/news127452360.html. We don't need no stinking
gigahertz circuits when we can have terahertz guided-wave circuits. That's
1000 times faster than gigahertz (but, of course, you know that). Based on the
terahertz
On Wed, Apr 16, 2008 at 11:31 AM, Steve Richfield
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I have been discussing this in depth with Mark. I suggest lurking and
jumping in at the end if you disagree with Mark's handling. In a nutshell,
as I see it, the fundamental departure is in the cause-and-effect chain
Josh,
On 4/15/08, J Storrs Hall, PhD [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tuesday 15 April 2008 07:36:56 pm, Steve Richfield wrote:
As I understand things, speed requires low capacitance, which DRAM
requires
higher capacitance, depending on how often you intend to refresh.
However,
refresh
Steve Richfield, writing about J Storrs Hall:
You sound like the sort that once the things is sort of
roughed out, likes to polish it up and make it as good as possible.
I don't believe your characterization is accurate. You could start with this
well-done book to check that opinion:
On Wednesday 16 April 2008 04:15:40 am, Steve Richfield wrote:
The problem with every such chip that I have seen is that I need many
separate parallel banks of memory per ALU. However, the products out there
only offer a single, and sometimes two banks. This might be fun to play
with, but
True, but this is inherent with ALL less than perfectly understood systems
and is not in any way peculiar to Dr. Eliza. Extrapolations are inherently
hazardous, sometimes without reasonable limit.
Correct. Part of the point to AGI is to automatically create knowledge bases
that are as
Just a quick reminder about list protocol: if you want to send someone
a document (especially a pdf), please remember to send it to their
personal email address, rather than send it to the entire list.
Or, better yet, make it available on a website.
Some of us still collect their mail on a
I have stuck my neck out and written an Open Letter to AGI (Artificial
General Intelligence) Investors on my website at http://susaro.com.
All part of a campaign to get this field jumpstarted.
Next week I am going to put up a road map for my own development project.
Richard Loosemore
For those using database systems for AGI, I'm wondering if the data
retrieval rate would be a problem.
Typically we need to retrieve many nodes from the DB to do inference.
The nodes may be scattered around the DB. So it may require *many*
disk accesses. My impression is that most DBMS are
11 matches
Mail list logo
