It is true that eventually this technology will be in the public domain and
be available to DARPA.
The important thing is to avoid DARPA getting it before everyone else does.
The ***only*** way to do this is to avoid accepting funding from them. If
this means that it takes 5 more years to
Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On
Behalf Of maitri
Sent: Tuesday, December 03, 2002 8:04 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [agi] How wrong are these numbers?
Ben,
I think I followed most of your analysis :)
I agree with most of what you
For instance, in relation to memory capacity. let's say I could live
for the age of the universe, roughly 15 billion years. I believe the
human mind(without enhancement of any kind) is capable of remembering
every detail of every day for that entire lifespan.
That is contrary to
Boy, I opened a can of worms.. here goes...
Kevin wrote:
I will go as far to say that any computer system we develop, even one
that realizes all the promises of the singularity, can only match the
capacity of the human Mind. Why? Because the universe is the Mind
itself, and the
Interesting writeup on the future of storage
density and access times...
http://www.smalltimes.com/document_display.cfm?document_id=5151
Kevin in snowy PA
Ben,
I just read the Bio. You gave alot more play
to his ideas than the show did. You probably know this, but Starlab has
folded and I think he was off to the states...
The show seemed to indicate that nothing of note
ever came out of the project. In fact, it appeared to not generate one
that's him...
- Original Message -
From: Shane Legg [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, December 09, 2002 3:43 PM
Subject: Re: [agi] AI on TV
maitri wrote:
The second guy was from either England or the states, not sure. He was
working out of his garage
I don't want to underestimate the value of embodiment for an AI system,
especially for the development of consciousness. But this is just my
opinion...
As far as a very useful AGI, I don't see the necessity of a body or sensory
inputs beyond textual input. Almost any form can be represented as
Even though this application appears to replicate the sounds birds make, it
does not appear to have any understanding as to *what* it is saying.
Perhaps through making various utterances and observing birds behavior, they
will be able to infer certain meanings that are associated with certain
Ben,
These precautions seem prudent..I'm glad you have thought this thru deeply..
Regarding the idea that the absence of evolutionary wiring will diminsh the
effect of the negative afflictions is an interesting one. It will be
interesting to see whether that holds to be true. One could argue
comments, critiques and suggestions. Just my 2 cents
worth.
your comments were useful to me..I hope to hear more from you and others as
we(society) move further along this path...
Kevin
Ed Heflin
- Original Message -
From: maitri [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday
Boy!! How timely was this!!
Since i have been called for displaying my eastern thought,
here is a wonderful stanza from the *Catholic* Mystic Thomas Merton that I just
received in my email...
The unitive knowledge of God in love is not the knowledge of an object
by a subject, but a far
emotions
and a feeling of disassociation with others. Should an AGI be just as
coldly calculating and detached..Look out!!!
Kevin
-- Ben Goertzel
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On
Behalf Of maitri
Sent: Friday, January 10, 2003 9:13 AM
thanks..
__
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around
http://mail.yahoo.com
-
This list is sponsored by AGIRI: http://www.agiri.org/email
To unsubscribe or change your options, please go to:
14 matches
Mail list logo
