Bryan Bishop wrote:
On Saturday 10 November 2007 14:10, Charles D Hixson wrote:
Bryan Bishop wrote:
On Saturday 10 November 2007 13:40, Charles D Hixson wrote:
OTOH, to make a go of this would require several people willing to
dedicate a lot of time consistently over a long
Benjamin Goertzel wrote:
Hi,
***
Maybe listing all the projects that have NOT achieved AGI might give
us some
insight.
***
That information is available in numerous published histories, and is
well known to all professional researchers in the field.
...
-- Ben
On Saturday 10 November 2007 13:40, Charles D Hixson wrote:
OTOH, to make a go of this would require several people willing to
dedicate a lot of time consistently over a long duration.
A good start might be a few bibliographies.
http://liinwww.ira.uka.de/bibliography/
- Bryan
-
This list
On Saturday 10 November 2007 14:10, Charles D Hixson wrote:
Bryan Bishop wrote:
On Saturday 10 November 2007 13:40, Charles D Hixson wrote:
OTOH, to make a go of this would require several people willing to
dedicate a lot of time consistently over a long duration.
A good start might be
On Saturday 10 November 2007 14:17, I wrote:
Bibliography + paper archive, then.
http://arxiv.org/ (perhaps we need one for AGI)
It has come to my attention that there is no open source software for
(p)reprint archives. This is unacceptable- I was hoping to quickly
download something from
: Re: [agi] Connecting Compatible Mindsets
Derek,
My suggestion would be:
If the individual's goal (the section #1 on my list) is to develop AGI
then I would say yes. Filling all sections would be optional. If the
goal is just to support AGI by developing [possibly narrow AI
A large number of individuals on this list are architecting an AGI solution
(or part of one) in their spare time. I think that most of those efforts do
not have meaningful answers to many of the questions, but rather intend to
address AGI questions from a particular perspective. Would such
On Wed, Nov 07, 2007 at 08:38:40AM -0700, Derek Zahn wrote:
A large number of individuals on this list are architecting an AGI
solution (or part of one) in their spare time. I think that most of
those efforts do not have meaningful answers to many of the questions,
but rather intend to
Linas,
revealing thier weaknesses and strengths to the competition.
Putting together functional AGI is a very difficult task. So far
(more/less) failure after failure. Many critically important things
are hidden in detailed design = sharing high level info isn't in
most cases as risky (from
On 11/8/07, Linas Vepstas [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
And the serious contenders are a handful of small companies that
seem unlikely to fill out a self-assesment status report card
revealing thier weaknesses and strengths to the competition.
If you don't find some like-minded partners, you may not
I think we can use the AGIRI wiki for this purpose:
http://www.agiri.org/wiki/AGI_Projects
Afterall we've been using this list for several years, and the list has
maintained a fairly neutral stance throughout.
My entry for G0 is here:
http://www.agiri.org/wiki/Generic_AI
AGIRI should let wiki
11 matches
Mail list logo
