>1).. 2.. 3).. >It would be nice to have a place where such work could be listed.
Right. I would keep it as a separate list. Its items could be: 1) [later] referenced from the AGI project list (possibly from sections 4,5,7,8,9,..). 2) nominated/suggested by authors (or automatically by the system based on section 14,15,.. keyword-matches) for use in a particular AGI project. It would be nice if the system had features for reporting similar efforts by independent groups. Regards, Jiri Jelinek On Nov 7, 2007 11:55 AM, Derek Zahn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Let me give a couple of examples: > > 1) John Doe is interested in developing Friendliness theory, with the goal > of producing well-defined constraints that could be integrated into an AGI > project. > > 2) Jane Smith has an idea for a fully general-purpose knowledge > representation scheme based on "Procedural Bayesian Semantics" and is > working out the details. > > 3) A non-theoretical researcher believes that intelligence is equivalent to > text compression and sets up a detailed testbed to track how better text > compression algorithms relate to concept and language models. > > None of these are "Narrow AI" in the usual meaning of that term, but none > of them have a well-defined path for spitting out Hal 9000 in five years > either. It would be nice to have a place where such work could be listed. > I know I would like to have a sense for all the interesting AGI-related > ideas being pursued by people. > > The number of true non-delusional AGI development efforts can be counted on > the fingers of one maimed hand. The amount of potentially interesting > AGI-related "research" is much larger. > > > ________________________________ > > > Date: Wed, 7 Nov 2007 11:07:16 -0500 > > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > To: [email protected] > > Subject: Re: [agi] Connecting Compatible Mindsets > > > > > > Derek, > > > > My suggestion would be: > > If the individual's goal (the section #1 on my list) is to develop AGI > > then I would say yes. Filling all sections would be optional. If the > > goal is just to support AGI by developing [possibly narrow AI] > > components useful for AGI then no (could be somehow listed > > separately). > > > > Regards, > > Jiri Jelinek > > > > On Nov 7, 2007 10:38 AM, Derek Zahn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > > A large number of individuals on this list are "architecting" an AGI > > > solution (or part of one) in their spare time. I think that most of > those > > > efforts do not have meaningful answers to many of the questions, but > rather > > > intend to address AGI questions from a particular perspective. Would > such > > > people be encouraged to fill this out, even though they might only > answer a > > > couple of the numbered points? > > > > > > Probably most people like that are not "serious contenders" in the sense > of > > > having a complete detailed plan for achieving a full AGI. Rather they > think > > > a particular aspect or approach is not being given enough attention and > hope > > > to explore part of it to see if their ideas merit further development. > > > > > > I could see wanting to include or exclude such amateur efforts, > depending > > > on the goals of this database. Perhaps a separate section would be a > good > > > idea for such people to provide a brief unstructured summary of their > > > interests and ideas. > > > > > > > > > > > > ________________________________ > > > > > > This list is sponsored by AGIRI: http://www.agiri.org/email > > > To unsubscribe or change your options, please go to: > > > http://v2.listbox.com/member/?& > > > > ----- > > > This list is sponsored by AGIRI: http://www.agiri.org/email > > To unsubscribe or change your options, please go to: > > http://v2.listbox.com/member/?& > > > ________________________________ > This list is sponsored by AGIRI: http://www.agiri.org/email > To unsubscribe or change your options, please go to: > http://v2.listbox.com/member/?& ----- This list is sponsored by AGIRI: http://www.agiri.org/email To unsubscribe or change your options, please go to: http://v2.listbox.com/member/?member_id=8660244&id_secret=62495397-c50b76
