>1).. 2.. 3)..
>It would be nice to have a place where such work could be listed.

Right. I would keep it as a separate list.
Its items could be:
1) [later] referenced from the AGI project list (possibly from
sections 4,5,7,8,9,..).
2) nominated/suggested by authors (or automatically by the system
based on section 14,15,.. keyword-matches) for use in a particular AGI
project.

It would be nice if the system had features for reporting similar
efforts by independent groups.

Regards,
Jiri Jelinek

On Nov 7, 2007 11:55 AM, Derek Zahn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Let me give a couple of examples:
>
>  1) John Doe is interested in developing Friendliness theory, with the goal
> of producing well-defined constraints that could be integrated into an AGI
> project.
>
>  2) Jane Smith has an idea for a fully general-purpose knowledge
> representation scheme based on "Procedural Bayesian Semantics" and is
> working out the details.
>
>  3) A non-theoretical researcher believes that intelligence is equivalent to
> text compression and sets up a detailed testbed to track how better text
> compression algorithms relate to concept and language models.
>
>  None of these are "Narrow AI" in the usual meaning of that term, but none
> of them have a well-defined path for spitting out Hal 9000 in five years
> either.  It would be nice to have a place where such work could be listed.
> I know I would like to have a sense for all the interesting AGI-related
> ideas being pursued by people.
>
>  The number of true non-delusional AGI development efforts can be counted on
> the fingers of one maimed hand.  The amount of potentially interesting
> AGI-related "research" is much larger.
>
>
>  ________________________________
>
>  > Date: Wed, 7 Nov 2007 11:07:16 -0500
> > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > To: [email protected]
> > Subject: Re: [agi] Connecting Compatible Mindsets
>
>
> >
> > Derek,
> >
> > My suggestion would be:
> > If the individual's goal (the section #1 on my list) is to develop AGI
> > then I would say yes. Filling all sections would be optional. If the
> > goal is just to support AGI by developing [possibly narrow AI]
> > components useful for AGI then no (could be somehow listed
> > separately).
> >
> > Regards,
> > Jiri Jelinek
> >
> > On Nov 7, 2007 10:38 AM, Derek Zahn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > >
> > > A large number of individuals on this list are "architecting" an AGI
> > > solution (or part of one) in their spare time. I think that most of
> those
> > > efforts do not have meaningful answers to many of the questions, but
> rather
> > > intend to address AGI questions from a particular perspective. Would
> such
> > > people be encouraged to fill this out, even though they might only
> answer a
> > > couple of the numbered points?
> > >
> > > Probably most people like that are not "serious contenders" in the sense
> of
> > > having a complete detailed plan for achieving a full AGI. Rather they
> think
> > > a particular aspect or approach is not being given enough attention and
> hope
> > > to explore part of it to see if their ideas merit further development.
> > >
> > > I could see wanting to include or exclude such amateur efforts,
> depending
> > > on the goals of this database. Perhaps a separate section would be a
> good
> > > idea for such people to provide a brief unstructured summary of their
> > > interests and ideas.
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > ________________________________
> > >
> > > This list is sponsored by AGIRI: http://www.agiri.org/email
> > > To unsubscribe or change your options, please go to:
> > > http://v2.listbox.com/member/?&;
> >
> > -----
>
> > This list is sponsored by AGIRI: http://www.agiri.org/email
> > To unsubscribe or change your options, please go to:
> > http://v2.listbox.com/member/?&;
>
>
> ________________________________
>  This list is sponsored by AGIRI: http://www.agiri.org/email
> To unsubscribe or change your options, please go to:
> http://v2.listbox.com/member/?&;

-----
This list is sponsored by AGIRI: http://www.agiri.org/email
To unsubscribe or change your options, please go to:
http://v2.listbox.com/member/?member_id=8660244&id_secret=62495397-c50b76

Reply via email to