Matt Mahoney <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
--- James Ratcliff wrote:
> I believe that is just a simple rule that you can input in most systems, and
> it will match that point, but promgramming in each of those rules is a very
> costly affair.
Fortunately, natural language (unlike artificial lang
--- James Ratcliff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I believe that is just a simple rule that you can input in most systems, and
> it will match that point, but promgramming in each of those rules is a very
> costly affair.
Fortunately, natural language (unlike artificial language) has a structure
t
I believe that is just a simple rule that you can input in most systems, and it
will match that point, but promgramming in each of those rules is a very costly
affair.
James
Matt Mahoney <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
--- James Ratcliff wrote:
> Interesting points, but I believe you can get aro
--- James Ratcliff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Interesting points, but I believe you can get around alot of the problems
> with two additional factors,
> a. using either large quantities of quality text, (ie novels, newspapers) or
> similar texts like newspapers.
> b. using a interactive built
Correct, but I don't believe that systems (like Cyc) are doing this type of
Active learning now, and it would help to gather quality information and
fact-check it.
Cyc does have some interesting projects where it takes a proposed statment and
when a engineer is working with it, will go out an
On 6/11/07, James Ratcliff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Interesting points, but I believe you can get around alot of the problems
with two additional factors,
a. using either large quantities of quality text, (ie novels, newspapers) or
similar texts like newspapers.
b. using a interactive built in
Interesting points, but I believe you can get around alot of the problems with
two additional factors,
a. using either large quantities of quality text, (ie novels, newspapers) or
similar texts like newspapers.
b. using a interactive built in 'checker' system, assisted learning where the
AI cou
--- Charles D Hixson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Mark Waser wrote:
> > >> The problem of logical reasoning in natural language is a pattern
> > recognition
> > >> problem (like natural language recognition in general). For example:
> >
> > >> - Frogs are green. Kermit is a frog. Therefore Ke
