Mike Tintner wrote:
Charles: Flaws in Hamlet: I don't think of this as involving general
intelligence. Specialized intelligence, yes, but if you see general
intelligence at work there you'll need to be more explicit for me to
understand what you mean. Now determining whether a particular
Matt Mahoney [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote
Object oriented programming is good for organizing software but I don't
think for organizing human knowledge. It is a very rough
approximation. We have used O-O for designing ontologies and expert
systems (IS-A links, etc), but this approach does
The only thing to learn from here is the way they managed to build hype
around their technology. Possibly appropriate here :-)
Technology wise, we're talking Lua state machines, genetic algorithms
that are manually tweaked for every special case. The resulting neural
nets are pretty much
Charles,
We're still a few million miles apart :). But perhaps we can focus on
something constructive here. On the one hand, while, yes, I'm talking about
extremely sophisticated behaviour in essaywriting, it has generalizable
features that characterise all life. (And I think BTW that a dog
Bruno Frandemiche asked for online AGI-related text.
If you're adventurous, I'd recommend the Workshop proceedings from 2006:
http://www.agiri.org/wiki/Workshop_Proceedings
and the conference proceedings from AGI-08:
http://www.agi-08.org/papers
---
My guess would be that this kind of approach will only be partly
successful, since fundamentally it's only based upon an elaborate kind
of 2D template matching. I think what actually happens is that during
early childhood experience we are able to statistically correlate
certain types of geometry
Readers of these lists might enjoy the refereed paper Overview of the Panda
Programming System (http://www.jot.fm:80/issues/issue_2008_05/article1/)
described in the following abstract:
This article provides an overview of a pattern-based programming system,
named Panda, for automatic
Hi Josh,
I briefly looked at the ImageNet description at the Princeton WordNet site. It
does not reveal whether the images are open source to the extent this new data
can be linked and distributed with WordNet, which has a very permissive
license.
-Steve
Stephen L. Reed
Artificial
thank you derek
i was reading all this
bye
- Message d'origine
De : Derek Zahn [EMAIL PROTECTED]
À : agi@v2.listbox.com
Envoyé le : Vendredi, 2 Mai 2008, 15h18mn 09s
Objet : RE: [agi] help me,please for books for agi and mind in pdf
Bruno Frandemiche asked for online AGI-related text.
--- Dr. Matthias Heger [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Matt Mahoney [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote
Actually that's only true in artificial languages. Children learn
words with semantic content like ball and milk before they learn
function words like the and of, in spite of their higher
A thousand thank yous.
---
agi
Archives: http://www.listbox.com/member/archive/303/=now
RSS Feed: http://www.listbox.com/member/archive/rss/303/
Modify Your Subscription:
http://www.listbox.com/member/?member_id=8660244id_secret=101455710-f059c4
Powered by
Matt Mahoney [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote
eat(Food f)
eat(Food f, ListSideDish l)
eat (Food f, ListTool l)
eat (Food f, ListPeople l)
...
This type of knowledge representation has been tried and it leads to a
morass of rules and no intuition on how children learn grammar. We do
not
--- Dr. Matthias Heger [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
So the medium layers of AGI will be the most difficult layers.
I think if you try to integrate a structured or O-O knowledge base at
the top and a signal processing or neural perceptual/motor system at
the bottom, then you are right. We can do a
I think it is even more complicated. The flow of signals in the brain does
not move only from low levels to high levels.
The modules communicate in both directions. And as far as I know there is
already evidence for this from cognitive science.
If you want to recognize objects in pictures you
14 matches
Mail list logo
