ike Tintner [mailto:tint...@blueyonder.co.uk]
> *Sent:* Thursday, August 12, 2010 4:56 AM
> *To:* agi
> *Subject:* Re: [agi] Nao Nao
>
>
>
> John,
>
>
>
> Any more detailed thoughts about its precise handling capabilities? Did it,
> first, not pick up the duck
;s bang for the buck in a big way.
John
From: Mike Tintner [mailto:tint...@blueyonder.co.uk]
Sent: Thursday, August 12, 2010 9:02 AM
To: agi
Subject: Re: [agi] Nao Nao
By not "made to perform work", you mean that it is not sturdy enough? Are
any half-way AGI robots made to perform
There is one further point which is absolutely fundamental
in operating system/compiler theory. The user should be unaware of how the
work is divided up. A robot may simply have a WiFi router and very little
else, or it might have considerable on board processing. The user should not
be aware of th
.
> Companies may resist this at first as they want to grab market share and
> don't understand the benefit.
>
>
>
> John
>
>
>
> *From:* Mike Tintner [mailto:tint...@blueyonder.co.uk]
> *Sent:* Thursday, August 12, 2010 4:56 AM
> *To:* agi
> *Subject:* Re:
Ian, et al,
2010/8/10 Ian Parker
>
> A μ sec is nothing even when we are considering time critical functions
> like balance.
>
Not true!!!
What most people miss are the stability requirements for closed loop control
systems. These are crystal clear in an analog world, but some (many?) people
t
r se will
lead to AGI?
From: John G. Rose
Sent: Thursday, August 12, 2010 3:17 PM
To: agi
Subject: RE: [agi] Nao Nao
Typically the demo is some of the best that it can do. It looks like the robot
is a mass produced model that has some really basic handling capabilities, not
that it is made
e protocol.
Companies may resist this at first as they want to grab market share and
don't understand the benefit.
John
From: Mike Tintner [mailto:tint...@blueyonder.co.uk]
Sent: Thursday, August 12, 2010 4:56 AM
To: agi
Subject: Re: [agi] Nao Nao
John,
Any more detailed thoughts ab
for further
clarificiation - but nothing yet).
From: John G. Rose
Sent: Thursday, August 12, 2010 5:46 AM
To: agi
Subject: RE: [agi] Nao Nao
I wasn't meaning to portray pessimism.
And that little sucker probably couldn't pick up a knife yet.
But this is a paradigm change
Just two quick comments. CCTV is already networked, the Police can track
smoothly from one camera to another. Second comment is that if you (say)
taking a heavy load upstairs you need 2 robots one holding each end. A
single PC can control them both. In fact a robot workshop will be a kind of
"cloud
I wasn't meaning to portray pessimism.
And that little sucker probably couldn't pick up a knife yet.
But this is a paradigm change happening where we will have many networked
mechanical entities. This opens up a whole new world of security and privacy
issues...
John
From: Davi
Well both. Though much of the control could be remote depending on
bandwidth.
Also, one robot could benefit from the eyes of many as they would all be
internetworked to a degree.
John
From: Ian Parker [mailto:ianpark...@gmail.com]
Your remarks about WiFi echo my own view. Should a
Way too pessimistic in my opinion.
On Mon, Aug 9, 2010 at 7:06 PM, John G. Rose wrote:
> Aww, so cute.
>
>
>
> I wonder if it has a Wi-Fi connection, DHCP's an IP address, and relays
> sensory information back to the main servers with all the other Nao's all
> collecting personal data in a massiv
Further pretty fab advanced stuff on
http://www.botjunkie.com/
See esp ball handling skills and ATHLETE Nasa robot
From: John G. Rose
Sent: Tuesday, August 10, 2010 12:06 AM
To: agi
Subject: RE: [agi] Nao Nao
Aww, so cute.
I wonder if it has a Wi-Fi connection, DHCP's an IP ad
Aww, so cute.
I wonder if it has a Wi-Fi connection, DHCP's an IP address, and relays
sensory information back to the main servers with all the other Nao's all
collecting personal data in a massive multi-agent geo-distributed
robo-network.
So cuddly!
And I wonder if it receives and exec
14 matches
Mail list logo
