BUS: Re: OFF: [Promotor] Distribution of Proposals 8008-8009

2018-02-05 Thread Gaelan Steele
Ttttpf > On Feb 4, 2018, at 5:19 PM, Gaelan Steele wrote: > > AGAINST 8008. ASCII art is more convenient and doesn’t require rules support. > > PRESENT 8009. I like my design (less abstract, larger but sparse map) more, > but this is a well-written, interesting proposal I

BUS: Re: OFF: [Promotor] Distribution of Proposals 8008-8009

2018-02-05 Thread ATMunn
I vote as follows: 8008* CB [1] 1.0 Picto-Nomic CB [1] 3 sh. AGAINST, it's a silly idea and could lead to some very confusing situations where nobody knows how the rule is to be interpreted 8009* Trigon, [2] 2.6 PAoaM v6 [3]Trigon 3 sh.

Re: BUS: Contract Destruction

2018-02-05 Thread ATMunn
I support. On 2/4/2018 7:32 PM, Aris Merchant wrote: I intend, with 2.0 Agoran Consent, to destroy each contract in existence. None of them are being used, and they can always be recreated later. I intend to take Notary, and want to clear the slate first. -Aris

BUS: Re: OFF: [Promotor] Distribution of Proposals 8008-8009

2018-02-05 Thread Nicholas Evans
On Sun, Feb 4, 2018 at 7:02 PM, Aris Merchant < thoughtsoflifeandligh...@gmail.com> wrote: > I hereby distribute each listed proposal, initiating the Agoran > Decision of whether to adopt it, and removing it from the proposal > pool. For this decision, the vote collector is the Assessor, the >

Re: BUS: Re: OFF: [Promotor] Distribution of Proposals 8008-8009

2018-02-05 Thread Nicholas Evans
Having read it, I change my vote on 8009 to an enthusiastic FOR. Virus-free. www.avast.com

BUS: Re: DIS: Win by paradox?

2018-02-05 Thread Nicholas Evans
TTttPF On Mon, Feb 5, 2018 at 9:54 PM, Nicholas Evans wrote: > > > On Mon, Feb 5, 2018 at 8:27 PM, Cuddle Beam wrote: > >> Well it seems viable to me so I'll give it a shot I guess lol. >> (Wielding paradoxes is a weird thing, I hope I'm doing it

BUS: Re: OFF: [Promotor] Distribution of Proposals 8008-8009

2018-02-05 Thread Edward Murphy
8008* CB [1] 1.0 Picto-Nomic CB [1] 3 sh. http://textbook.stpauls.br/International_Economics/images/pic061.jpg 8009* Trigon, [2] 2.6 PAoaM v6 [3]Trigon 3 sh. PRESENT

Re: BUS: Contract Destruction

2018-02-05 Thread Telnaior
On 2018-02-05 11:32, Aris Merchant wrote: I intend, with 2.0 Agoran Consent, to destroy each contract in existence. None of them are being used, and they can always be recreated later. I intend to take Notary, and want to clear the slate first. -Aris I convert all of my bills into shinies

Re: BUS: Contract Destruction

2018-02-05 Thread Edward Murphy
Aris wrote: I intend, with 2.0 Agoran Consent, to destroy each contract in existence. None of them are being used, and they can always be recreated later. I intend to take Notary, and want to clear the slate first. I support each intent thus announced.

Re: BUS: Re: DIS: Win by paradox?

2018-02-05 Thread Cuddle Beam
I should put one myself up too actually lol: I create a contract by paying 1 shiny to Agora, with the following text: --- "This sentence is false." If the statement above is true, I owe 1 shinies to Agora, but if its false, I owe no shinies to Agora. While I owe any Shinies to Agora, I also

Re: BUS: Contract Destruction

2018-02-05 Thread VJ Rada
I convert all of my bills into shinies with the Credit Union I then support. On Tue, Feb 6, 2018 at 2:05 PM, Telnaior wrote: > On 2018-02-05 11:32, Aris Merchant wrote: >> >> I intend, with 2.0 Agoran Consent, to destroy each contract in >> existence. None of them are being