Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Re: OFF: [Registrar] Census

2009-05-16 Thread Ed Murphy
Taral wrote: On Fri, May 15, 2009 at 6:36 PM, Aaron Goldfein aarongoldf...@gmail.com wrote: Or we could just... you know... change the quorum rules. Or the activity rules. In B nomic, one is only active in a sense if one has voted in the previous week. Not any more; their latest

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Re: OFF: [Registrar] Census

2009-05-16 Thread Charles Walker
On Sat, May 16, 2009 at 2:46 AM, Taral tar...@gmail.com wrote: On Fri, May 15, 2009 at 6:36 PM, Aaron Goldfein aarongoldf...@gmail.com wrote: Or we could just... you know... change the quorum rules. Or the activity rules. In B nomic, one is only active in a sense if one has voted in the

DIS: Re: BUS: Proposal: better reports

2009-05-16 Thread Alex Smith
On Fri, 2009-05-15 at 09:38 -0400, Geoffrey Spear wrote: Rather than try to take jobs away from officers, let's just require better reports. I submit the following proposal entitled Better Reports: {{ In Rule 2143, add the following paragraph at the end: Reports SHALL be

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Re: OFF: [Registrar] Census

2009-05-16 Thread Geoffrey Spear
On Sat, May 16, 2009 at 4:56 AM, Alex Smith ais...@bham.ac.uk wrote: I submit the following proposal (Title=Active Players Must Do Something Useful, II 1, AI 1.7): Cron job to be the first to burn off your rest ftw!

DIS: Re: BUS: Re: OFF: [Promotor] Distribution of Proposals 6302-6323

2009-05-16 Thread Ed Murphy
coppro wrote: Geoffrey Spear wrote: CoE: ais523 is not the author of this proposal; e retracted eir version shortly before I distributed. I believe the precedent is that it was distributed with no author, although my reading of the current rules makes it look to me that I'm the author. In

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Re: OFF: [Promotor] Distribution of Proposals 6302-6323

2009-05-16 Thread Sean Hunt
Ed Murphy wrote: coppro wrote: Geoffrey Spear wrote: CoE: ais523 is not the author of this proposal; e retracted eir version shortly before I distributed. I believe the precedent is that it was distributed with no author, although my reading of the current rules makes it look to me that

DIS: Re: BUS: Re: OFF: [IADoP] Janitor Election is FAILING QUORUM

2009-05-16 Thread Quazie
On Sat, May 16, 2009 at 11:18 AM, Aaron Goldfein aarongoldf...@gmail.com wrote: On Sat, May 16, 2009 at 3:58 AM, Alex Smith ais...@bham.ac.uk wrote: On Fri, 2009-05-15 at 21:49 -0700, Kerim Aydin wrote: On Fri, 15 May 2009, Aaron Goldfein wrote: The votes for Janitor are as follows:

DIS: Re: BUS: Re: OFF: [Promotor] Distribution of Proposals 6302-6323

2009-05-16 Thread Aaron Goldfein
On Sat, May 16, 2009 at 10:15 AM, Elliott Hird penguinoftheg...@googlemail.com wrote: 2009/5/16 Geoffrey Spear geoffsp...@gmail.com: CoE: ais523 is not the author of this proposal; e retracted eir version shortly before I distributed. I believe the precedent is that it was distributed

DIS: Re: BUS: Re: OFF: [Promotor] Distribution of Proposals 6302-6323

2009-05-16 Thread Aaron Goldfein
On Sat, May 16, 2009 at 1:52 PM, Elliott Hird penguinoftheg...@googlemail.com wrote: 2009/5/16 Geoffrey Spear geoffsp...@gmail.com: This distribution of proposals 6302-6323 initiates the Agoran Decisions on whether to adopt them. The eligible voters for ordinary proposals are the active

DIS: Re: BUS: Re: OFF: [IADoP] IADoP Election is FAILING QUORUM

2009-05-16 Thread Aaron Goldfein
On Sat, May 16, 2009 at 4:05 PM, Ed Murphy emurph...@socal.rr.com wrote: Yally wrote: The votes for IADoP are as follows: comex (0): None Human Point Two (5): comex, Human Point Two, OscarMeyr, Quazie, Wooble[1] Wooble (0): None Yally (3): C-walker[2], Tiger[2], Yally [1]

DIS: Re: BUS: Re: OFF: [IADoP] Janitor Election is FAILING QUORUM

2009-05-16 Thread Rodlen
On Sat, May 16, 2009 at 8:18 AM, Aaron Goldfein aarongoldf...@gmail.comwrote: On Sat, May 16, 2009 at 3:58 AM, Alex Smith ais...@bham.ac.uk wrote: On Fri, 2009-05-15 at 21:49 -0700, Kerim Aydin wrote: On Fri, 15 May 2009, Aaron Goldfein wrote: The votes for Janitor are as follows:

DIS: Re: OFF: [IADoP] Resolving the IADoP Election

2009-05-16 Thread Quazie
On Sat, May 16, 2009 at 9:15 PM, Aaron Goldfein aarongoldf...@gmail.com wrote: I resolve the Agoran decision to decide the holder of the IADoP office. The votes are as follows: comex (0): None Human Point Two (5): comex, Human Point Two, OscarMeyr, Quazie, Wooble[1] Wooble (0): None Yally

DIS: Re: OFF: [IADoP] Promotor Election 2

2009-05-16 Thread Ed Murphy
Yally wrote: I initiate an Agoran decision to decide the holder of the Promotor office. The eligible voters are the active players, the vote collector is the IADoP, and the candidates are coppro and Wooble (incumbent). I endorse Wooble. I vote for Wooble (this is effective iff the previous

DIS: Re: BUS: Re: OFF: [Promotor] Distribution of Proposals 6302-6323

2009-05-16 Thread comex
On Sat, May 16, 2009 at 11:29 PM, Sean Hunt ride...@gmail.com wrote: comex wrote: On Sat, May 16, 2009 at 9:02 PM, Sean Hunt ride...@gmail.com wrote: comex wrote: 6310 D 1 2.0 coppro              Maple Leaf Dominance AGAINST, grammatically incorrect (it's vs its) and despite the AI it would