On Sun, Jun 30, 2013 at 10:56 PM, Steven Gardner
steven.gard...@monash.edu wrote:
On 1 July 2013 14:35, Chuck Carroll games...@chuckcarroll.org wrote:
Thanks to all the players, especially my fellow winners, and many many
thanks to Fool for running such an enjoyable game. Like others have
I had intended to vote against 307 (which transmuted 112) but missed the
voting period. My opposition was partly against lengthening the game, but
more as a tit-for-tat-like strategy, as omd had voted against my first
proposal to transmute 110.
The interesting thing on transmutation is that a
If anyone wants them, let me know.
-- Walker
Yes, please.
--
Steve Gardner
via mobile
On 1 Jul 2013 19:33, Charles Walker charles.w.wal...@gmail.com wrote:
If anyone wants them, let me know.
-- Walker
On Mon, 1 Jul 2013, Charles Walker wrote:
If anyone wants them, let me know.
-- Walker
Same here - yes please! -G.
On Mon, 1 Jul 2013, Fool wrote:
On 30/06/2013 5:41 PM, Kerim Aydin wrote:
Of course, Blob's version of innocuous wasn't... so we sure didn't have a
commanding lead going into the last vote. At the end we knew if everyone in
the
game voted and spent their points on voting we'd not get
On Mon, 1 Jul 2013, Fool wrote:
On 01/07/2013 12:35 AM, Chuck Carroll wrote:
Like others have mentioned, I like the idea of a Nomic with a defined
endpoint (being well aware, of course, that there is no guarantee
that the endpoint will remain unchanged) in which I can most likely
play
On Sun, 30 Jun 2013, Aaron Goldfein wrote:
I like this idea, and was the spirit of what I was going for in my
proposal to make Agora XX resume annually. The holiday idea is also a
good one; could we perhaps replace the current Christmas time holiday?
As a student I have lots of time free
On Mon, 1 Jul 2013, Fool wrote:
On 01/07/2013 12:35 AM, Chuck Carroll wrote:
Like others have mentioned, I like the idea of a Nomic with a defined
endpoint (being well aware, of course, that there is no guarantee
that the endpoint will remain unchanged) in which I can most likely
play
On Mon, Jul 1, 2013 at 9:53 AM, Kerim Aydin ke...@u.washington.edu wrote:
Question for omd: did you have a clever way to win had 363 put us into
Zeno's Endgame? I came up with a couple thoughts but not particularly
compelling ones. -G.
Not really, since a quorum would still be required to
I read the chat logs, and found in it the link to Michael Norrish's Nomic
World page, and so the summaries I wrote of the first six games (which
turned out to be the only six games) of Nomic World, which I hadn't thought
about for 20 years. That was a blast!
The reason that Nomic World died was
On Mon, 2013-07-01 at 10:21 -0400, omd wrote:
On Mon, Jul 1, 2013 at 9:53 AM, Kerim Aydin ke...@u.washington.edu wrote:
Question for omd: did you have a clever way to win had 363 put us into
Zeno's Endgame? I came up with a couple thoughts but not particularly
compelling ones. -G.
Not
On 1 Jul 2013, at 15:37, omd c.ome...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Jul 1, 2013 at 8:39 AM, Charles Walker
charles.w.wal...@gmail.com wrote:
CoE: What happened to my proposals?
On further review, I misattributed one proposal by you, 7497, to
myself, but I don't think I missed any. Please let me
On 01/07/2013 2:54 AM, Chuck Carroll wrote:
I also have an idea or two about how a group of players could get around the
requirement of unanimity for making a rule mutable against a single player
determined to prevent all such transmutations.
The majority can kick the minority out of the
On Mon, 1 Jul 2013, Fool wrote:
On 01/07/2013 2:54 AM, Chuck Carroll wrote:
I also have an idea or two about how a group of players could get around the
requirement of unanimity for making a rule mutable against a single player
determined to prevent all such transmutations.
The
Hello to you too Charles.
I have seen a bit of talk about an active IRC channel. Is that still up?
Matthew Berlin
arkes...@gmail.com
535 Misty Patch Rd.
Coatesville, PA 19320
(484) 832-1055
On Fri, Jun 28, 2013 at 7:09 PM, Charles Walker
charles.w.wal...@gmail.comwrote:
On 28 Jun 2013
On Mon, Jul 1, 2013 at 12:51 PM, Matt Berlin arkes...@gmail.com wrote:
Hello to you too Charles.
I have seen a bit of talk about an active IRC channel. Is that still up?
##nomic on Freenode. It's an Agoran DF.
-scshunt
On Mon, Jul 1, 2013 at 12:27 PM, Kerim Aydin ke...@u.washington.edu wrote:
I thought at one point the complete silence at how one becomes a player
was quite weak (I guess it came up with the forfeiture-forcing). Walker,
consider taking note! -G.
Incidentally, I disliked the judgement that a
On Mon, 1 Jul 2013, omd wrote:
On Mon, Jul 1, 2013 at 12:27 PM, Kerim Aydin ke...@u.washington.edu wrote:
I thought at one point the complete silence at how one becomes a player
was quite weak (I guess it came up with the forfeiture-forcing). Walker,
consider taking note! -G.
On Mon, Jul 1, 2013 at 6:44 AM, Kerim Aydin ke...@u.washington.edu wrote:
On Mon, 1 Jul 2013, Charles Walker wrote:
If anyone wants them, let me know.
-- Walker
Same here - yes please! -G.
I would also love to see them. Unfortunately something came up at the
last minute and I wasn't
On 01/07/2013 4:55 PM, Charles Walker wrote:
RETURNING OFFICOR'S PARTY REPORT
There are no parties; all players are Independent.
-- Walker
This intent is not stale yet...
http://www.mail-archive.com/agora-business@agoranomic.org/msg25052.html
Support my motion to found the Serious party!
On 29 April 2013 17:53, Kerim Aydin ke...@u.washington.edu wrote:
Proto: basic Infractions mechanism (Discuss!)
-
Create the following power-2 Rule, Infractions:
Crimes and Infractions are explicitly
On Mon, 1 Jul 2013, Charles Walker wrote:
On 29 April 2013 17:53, Kerim Aydin ke...@u.washington.edu wrote:
Proto: basic Infractions mechanism (Discuss!)
G., do you still intend to propose this?
I haven't taken it any further, feel free to jump into the lead
if you like, or I'll see if I
On 1 July 2013 01:09, Sean Hunt scsh...@csclub.uwaterloo.ca wrote:
7492 2 50 O Walker Good Judgement
AGAINST; this is hardly a proposal worth 50 Yaks.
I spent Y40 on making this extra Distributable, so I would only make a
small profit if it passes.
I suppose the fact that voters might
On Mon, Jul 1, 2013 at 6:50 PM, Charles Walker
charles.w.wal...@gmail.com wrote:
On 1 July 2013 01:09, Sean Hunt scsh...@csclub.uwaterloo.ca wrote:
7492 2 50 O Walker Good Judgement
AGAINST; this is hardly a proposal worth 50 Yaks.
I spent Y40 on making this extra Distributable, so I
Note to self: This was never distributed. As I said, by next week, I
will have a script to avoid these way-too-frequent missed proposals.
Or you can replace me.
On Thu, May 30, 2013 at 12:53 PM, Charles Walker
charles.w.wal...@gmail.com wrote:
{ Yak niggles (AI 2, proposal fee Y40)
Amend
On Mon, 1 Jul 2013, Chuck Carroll wrote:
A very similar thought had occurred to me, except the Speaker could do even
better than independently selecting a Judge for each possible set; e could
link the sets in such a way to maximize the probability that the same Judge
is selected for each set.
Argument: not all obligations require a time limit.
On Jul 1, 2013 5:57 PM, omd c.ome...@gmail.com wrote:
I award arkestra Y100, the Registration Reward.
I award Fool Y100, the Registration Reward.
CFJ: It was LEGAL for me to award Fool Y100 earlier in this message.
Arguments: I have
On Mon, 1 Jul 2013, Chuck Carroll wrote:
I also have an idea or two about how a group of players could get around the
requirement of unanimity for making a rule mutable against a single player
determined to prevent all such transmutations.
My vague memory is that something like that is how
On Mon, 1 Jul 2013, omd wrote:
INACTIVE PLAYERS (8)
PlayerInactive since
----
Pavitra 31 Mar 13
Kolja 7 Apr 13
Wooble 7 Apr 13
Machiavelli 13 May 13
Tomas
That was one of the ideas, yes. Not the only one. :)
Chuck
-Original Message-
From: agora-discussion [mailto:agora-discussion-boun...@agoranomic.org] On
Behalf Of Fool
Sent: Monday, July 01, 2013 12:19 PM
To: agora-discussion@agoranomic.org
Subject: Re: DIS: Agora XX: 13th and final
A communication to Ambassador Abuse: I change rule 5 to read 'Ambabusese is
a strange language: If Agora would interpret the Ambabusese as transferring
or awarding a number of Yaks, but failing to transfer or award Yaks such
that both Sgeo and woggle gain at least 3000 Yaks in the week, the
On Mon, Jul 1, 2013 at 7:16 PM, Ørjan Johansen oer...@nvg.ntnu.no wrote:
[1] legal fiction; actually 4 Jun 13
That seems to be a dangling [1].
Indeed; it should refer to Machiavelli.
On Mon, 1 Jul 2013, Sgeo wrote:
A communication to Ambassador Abuse: I change rule 5 to read 'Ambabusese is a
strange language: If Agora would
interpret the Ambabusese as transferring or awarding a number of Yaks, but
failing to transfer or award Yaks such
that both Sgeo and woggle gain
wait now i am confused is agora xx its own nomic as is ambassador abuse or
are they subdivisions of that thing we know as agora
On Mon, Jul 1, 2013 at 8:41 PM, Kerim Aydin ke...@u.washington.edu wrote:
On Mon, 1 Jul 2013, Sgeo wrote:
A communication to Ambassador Abuse: I change rule 5 to
Agora XX was its own nomic that ran on the Agora discussion list
for the past couple weeks. It's over now.
Ambassador abuse is (in theory) also its own nomic, which was
created for the purpose of trying to scam something in Agora.
-G.
On Mon, 1 Jul 2013, Max Schutz wrote:
wait now i am
sounds kinda bizzarre
On Mon, Jul 1, 2013 at 9:01 PM, Kerim Aydin ke...@u.washington.edu wrote:
Agora XX was its own nomic that ran on the Agora discussion list
for the past couple weeks. It's over now.
Ambassador abuse is (in theory) also its own nomic, which was
created for the
On Mon, Jul 1, 2013 at 9:30 PM, Charles Walker
charles.w.wal...@gmail.comwrote:
I submit the following proposals:
{
Exile too harsh, AI 2, disinterested
Amend Rule 1504 (Criminal Cases) by removing the text and CANNOT
register for two months after that time.
[ EXILED players still won't
38 matches
Mail list logo
