Diplonomic 2020 is starting soon, and Aris and Trigon (a non-contestant)
are planning to team up and play as one, and submit a proposal to allow it.
Is there anyone else who was interested in playing but didn't get in in
time? I would be happy to have a teammate.
--
ATMunn
friendly neighborhood
THE AGORA NOMIC CODE OF REGULATIONS
These ACORNs are also online at http://agoranomic.org/ruleset/
Date of this ACORN: 9 Jul 2020
The Birthday Tournament
This section has the regulations governing the Birthday
On 7/8/2020 2:33 PM, Jason Cobb via agora-business wrote:
On 7/7/20 5:11 PM, Jason Cobb via agora-business wrote:
I consent to, and create, a contract whose title is "Anti-Trigon
Lockbox" and with the following text:
{
Jason is the only party to this contract. If any other person becomes
thanks guys
On Wed, Jul 8, 2020 at 4:57 PM Publius Scribonius Scholasticus via
agora-discussion wrote:
> On 7/8/20 10:56 AM, Cuddle Beam via agora-discussion wrote:
> > What would be the fix? I don't entirely understand the mistake, sorry.
> It's
> > trivial for me to destroy the contract and
On 7/8/20 10:56 AM, Cuddle Beam via agora-discussion wrote:
> What would be the fix? I don't entirely understand the mistake, sorry. It's
> trivial for me to destroy the contract and remake it with a shorter timer.
> I just made it 24h for the gravitas lol.
It's simply a typo: it says "contact"
What would be the fix? I don't entirely understand the mistake, sorry. It's
trivial for me to destroy the contract and remake it with a shorter timer.
I just made it 24h for the gravitas lol.
On Wed, Jul 8, 2020 at 4:38 PM ATMunn via agora-business <
agora-busin...@agoranomic.org> wrote:
> On
On 7/8/2020 7:33 AM, ATMunn via agora-discussion wrote:
> On 7/8/2020 2:26 AM, Reuben Staley via agora-discussion wrote:
>> As fun as this is, contracts cannot perform actions automatically. I
>> guess you could amend it so that you CAN do so, but at that point,
>> there's no real reason for
On 7/8/2020 2:26 AM, Reuben Staley via agora-discussion wrote:
As fun as this is, contracts cannot perform actions automatically. I
guess you could amend it so that you CAN do so, but at that point,
there's no real reason for the contracts to fork like this since you can
just create a large
no u
On Wed, Jul 8, 2020 at 2:48 PM Jason Cobb via agora-business <
agora-busin...@agoranomic.org> wrote:
> On 7/8/20 2:25 AM, omd via agora-business wrote:
> > at 6:27 PM, Jason Cobb via agora-official
>
> > wrote:
> >
> >> 8464 You can certify, but you can't win ever! REJECTED
> > CoE:
at 11:43 PM, Aris Merchant via agora-business
wrote:
On Wed, Jul 1, 2020 at 9:00 PM omd via agora-business
wrote:
CoE: The distribution message is inconsistent about who authored this
proposal. If it was validly distributed, AGAINST.
Denied. The message said: "Where the information
how would they become publicly unavailable though?
On Wed, Jul 8, 2020 at 9:26 AM N. S. via agora-discussion <
agora-discussion@agoranomic.org> wrote:
> well,,, it might not work. there could be a problem with the reproduction
> being "a change that would make the contract's text publicly
well,,, it might not work. there could be a problem with the reproduction
being "a change that would make the contract's text publicly unavailable"
On Wed, Jul 8, 2020 at 5:20 PM Cuddle Beam via agora-discussion <
agora-discussion@agoranomic.org> wrote:
> I don't intend to overload our Notary
I don't intend to overload our Notary with work. Once I have the
Contracolis reproduce once or twice my intention is to CfJ to confirm that
they have reproduced and then destroy them all.
On Wed, Jul 8, 2020 at 8:50 AM Reuben Staley via agora-discussion <
agora-discussion@agoranomic.org> wrote:
Yarr, I support as well.
Let's haul in this here buxom loot, mateys!
On Wed, Jul 8, 2020 at 8:36 AM omd via agora-business <
agora-busin...@agoranomic.org> wrote:
> at 4:52 PM, N. S. via agora-business
> wrote:
>
> > I intent to transfer 125 coins (the current amount it has) from the L
> >
at 11:30 PM, Aris Merchant via agora-discussion
wrote:
Damn it. I broke that one way, and then my fix broke it another way.
You are referring, I presume, to the fact that one doesn't need to
consent to create a promise?
Yeah.
At least I can't think of a situation where that's exploitable
On 2020-07-08 00:39, N. S. via agora-discussion wrote:
yep, i'm also quite sure that this works, a person can consent entirely by
contract and consenting is sufficient to create a contract. this could be
called, quite circular.
Well, dang. Sorry, ATMunn. I tried.
--
Trigon
I LOVE SPAGHETTI
yep, i'm also quite sure that this works, a person can consent entirely by
contract and consenting is sufficient to create a contract. this could be
called, quite circular.
On Wed, Jul 8, 2020 at 4:30 PM omd via agora-discussion <
agora-discussion@agoranomic.org> wrote:
> at 11:26 PM, Reuben
On Tue, Jul 7, 2020 at 11:20 PM omd via agora-discussion
wrote:
>
> at 11:06 PM, Cuddle Beam via agora-discussion
> wrote:
>
> > I think that having single-party contracts feels / is safer. You can
> > arbitrarily amend it without needing to rely on anyone else and nobody else
> > can join it
at 11:26 PM, Reuben Staley via agora-discussion
wrote:
On 2020-07-07 23:59, Cuddle Beam via agora-business wrote:
I have no idea if this works, but it might be useful for certain
applications. Experimentation!!!
I create the following contract called "Contracoli":
Cuddlebeam is the
On 2020-07-07 23:59, Cuddle Beam via agora-business wrote:
I have no idea if this works, but it might be useful for certain
applications. Experimentation!!!
I create the following contract called "Contracoli":
Cuddlebeam is the sole member to this contract. After 24 hours have
passed
at 11:06 PM, Cuddle Beam via agora-discussion
wrote:
I think that having single-party contracts feels / is safer. You can
arbitrarily amend it without needing to rely on anyone else and nobody else
can join it which adds another layer of speculative protection.
I don’t think single-party
On Tue, Jul 7, 2020 at 11:15 PM Cuddle Beam via agora-discussion <
agora-discussion@agoranomic.org> wrote:
> > ATEOISIDTIDWHPAFALT
>
> lmfao what is this
See this [1].
[1] http://zenith.homelinux.net/agora_acronyms.php
-Aris
it's a nonsense acronym meant to refer to "ISIDTID" (i said i did therefore
i did), which is the agoran fallacy that you can do anything as long as you
say so.
On Wed, Jul 8, 2020 at 4:15 PM Cuddle Beam via agora-discussion <
agora-discussion@agoranomic.org> wrote:
> > ATEOISIDTIDWHPAFALT
>
>
> ATEOISIDTIDWHPAFALT
lmfao what is this
On Wed, Jul 8, 2020 at 2:12 AM Aris Merchant via agora-discussion <
agora-discussion@agoranomic.org> wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 7, 2020 at 5:00 PM Jason Cobb via agora-discussion <
> agora-discussion@agoranomic.org> wrote:
>
> > On 7/7/20 7:55 PM, ATMunn via
I think that having single-party contracts feels / is safer. You can
arbitrarily amend it without needing to rely on anyone else and nobody else
can join it which adds another layer of speculative protection.
On Wed, Jul 8, 2020 at 12:03 AM ATMunn via agora-business <
25 matches
Mail list logo
