nix wrote:
On 5/1/23 15:05, Kerim Aydin via agora-discussion wrote:
When you do a job manually for a while, you start to use shortcuts, get
faster, streamline, then maybe join a couple of steps using a bit of code…
there’s really no sharp line between “automation” and plain old
“experience” -
On Mon, May 1, 2023 at 10:28 AM nix via agora-business
wrote:
> If an officer specified a Delegate when taking a Vacation, and the
> Delegate has publicly consented, then the Delegate can act as if e
> is the holder of the Office while the officer is On Vacation.
I'm still against
Kerim Aydin via agora-discussion [2023-05-01 11:46]:
> Maybe making the delegation subject to a public volunteer process - so it’s
> treated differently if more than one person want the job, so the
> hand-picking potential is more limited?
I suggest we treat this the same way as the list of
On 5/1/23 14:46, Kerim Aydin via agora-discussion wrote:
> While I was supportive of the delegation idea on discord, I’m coming around
> to Yachay’s position. I’ve “taken breaks” from arbitor regularly - snail
> and Jason both did the job for a bit last year - but when it was
> technically
On 5/1/23 15:05, Kerim Aydin via agora-discussion wrote:
> When you do a job manually for a while, you start to use shortcuts, get
> faster, streamline, then maybe join a couple of steps using a bit of code…
> there’s really no sharp line between “automation” and plain old
> “experience” - the two
On Mon, May 1, 2023 at 12:37 PM nix via agora-discussion <
agora-discussion@agoranomic.org> wrote:
> On 5/1/23 14:36, nix via agora-discussion wrote:
> > Ideally, I think, everything is doable with automation. In practice tho,
> > I'm not sure what that looks like.
>
> Crucial typo. I think
On 5/1/23 14:49, Yachay Wayllukuq via agora-discussion wrote:
> I was actually about to post the same thing about #2 in an election getting
> the bench lol. It seems like the most effort-economic way to do it.
>
> And yeah, I think it could work as per-office.
I'd prefer just trusting the
On 5/1/23 14:18, Forest Sweeney via agora-discussion wrote:
> The other part of this is: Janet is Rulekeepor purely because no one has
> bothered to try to take the position properly. The Elections are meant to
> encourage shakeups, but without sufficient platforms for change, then we
> shalln't
On 5/1/23 13:28, nix via agora-business wrote:
> An officer is On Vacation from a specified office if e has taken a
> Vacation from that office in the last 30 days. The ADoP SHALL
> include which officers are On Vacation in weekly report.
Could just say that the set of officers on
Hrm, now that you mention it I think that would be better, yeah.
On Mon, May 1, 2023 at 9:38 PM nix via agora-discussion <
agora-discussion@agoranomic.org> wrote:
> On 5/1/23 14:36, nix via agora-discussion wrote:
> > Ideally, I think, everything is doable with automation. In practice tho,
> >
On 5/1/23 14:36, nix via agora-discussion wrote:
> Ideally, I think, everything is doable with automation. In practice tho,
> I'm not sure what that looks like.
Crucial typo. I think ideally everything is doable *without* automation.
--
nix
Prime Minister, Herald
On 5/1/23 14:28, Yachay Wayllukuq via agora-discussion wrote:
> Oh, I see now, that's very good.
>
> Hm. I wonder if there was a way to make offices significantly easier so
> that we didn't need to rely on these things or the apparent elitism that
> some offices require.
This will be
Oh, I see now, that's very good.
Hm. I wonder if there was a way to make offices significantly easier so
that we didn't need to rely on these things or the apparent elitism that
some offices require.
But besides resorting to just having everyone play on Google Sheets in
parallel to the regular
On 5/1/23 14:04, Yachay Wayllukuq via agora-discussion wrote:
> That seems to alludes that officers prefer to keep their tools to
> themselves or they don't design them to be easily shared in the first
> place, which I don't think is the best practice for Agora overall.
>
> Maybe we can encourage
That seems to alludes that officers prefer to keep their tools to
themselves or they don't design them to be easily shared in the first
place, which I don't think is the best practice for Agora overall.
Maybe we can encourage officers to make/use public tools and tutorials that
anyone can
On 5/1/23 13:49, Yachay Wayllukuq via agora-discussion wrote:
> I was actually about to post the same thing about #2 in an election getting
> the bench lol. It seems like the most effort-economic way to do it.
>
> And yeah, I think it could work as per-office.
My main concern is still the time
I was actually about to post the same thing about #2 in an election getting
the bench lol. It seems like the most effort-economic way to do it.
And yeah, I think it could work as per-office.
On Mon, May 1, 2023 at 8:45 PM nix via agora-discussion <
agora-discussion@agoranomic.org> wrote:
> On
While I was supportive of the delegation idea on discord, I’m coming around
to Yachay’s position. I’ve “taken breaks” from arbitor regularly - snail
and Jason both did the job for a bit last year - but when it was
technically resigning without the expectation of getting the job back I
think it
On 5/1/23 13:38, Yachay Wayllukuq via agora-discussion wrote:
> Perhaps a "bench" system like in team sports, where there is a main
> officer, but if they can't do their roles, or want to take a vacation, the
> person on the bench takes the spot until they come back.
>
> The bench positions are
Perhaps a "bench" system like in team sports, where there is a main
officer, but if they can't do their roles, or want to take a vacation, the
person on the bench takes the spot until they come back.
The bench positions are elected or otherwise offered to everyone equally
somehow.
On Mon, May 1,
Well... I'd like to see Janet take a break and we'll find out how this
process works anyways. It's all part of perfecting these processes
I don't imagine anyone would willingly volunteer to be a delegate,
considering that few even opted to become candidates in the recent
elections.
On Mon,
On 5/1/23 13:32, Yachay Wayllukuq via agora-discussion wrote:
> I'm not sure if my main point is coming across that the problem would be
> the "dynasty" thing, where the veteran gets to hand-pick themselves how the
> office continues rather than having a process that is more impartial.
Oh I see.
I'm not sure if my main point is coming across that the problem would be
the "dynasty" thing, where the veteran gets to hand-pick themselves how the
office continues rather than having a process that is more impartial.
On Mon, May 1, 2023 at 8:24 PM nix via agora-discussion <
On 5/1/23 13:20, nix via agora-discussion wrote:
> On 5/1/23 12:59, Yachay Wayllukuq via agora-discussion wrote:
>> I'm sure that this is well-intended but I feel like this strongly
>> encourages "dynasties" of officers where the veterans are de facto heads of
>> who will get the privilege of
On 5/1/23 12:59, Yachay Wayllukuq via agora-discussion wrote:
> I'm sure that this is well-intended but I feel like this strongly
> encourages "dynasties" of officers where the veterans are de facto heads of
> who will get the privilege of choose who get to be the next Delegate or
> not. Having
It's actually the opposite: right now we HAVE dynasties of players who just
have had these roles forever, and they've never taken a break. Encouraging
them to take a break, and specifying a different player, forces more
change-ups than we have currently, because we trust so much currently in
the
Wow, I did some major word soup there, I hope my point came across anyways
lol
On Monday, May 1, 2023, Yachay Wayllukuq wrote:
> I'm sure that this is well-intended but I feel like this strongly
> encourages "dynasties" of officers where the veterans are de facto heads of
> who will get the
I'm sure that this is well-intended but I feel like this strongly
encourages "dynasties" of officers where the veterans are de facto heads of
who will get the privilege of choose who get to be the next Delegate or
not. Having been Delegate seem like major boon to have towards actually
getting the
28 matches
Mail list logo
