CFJ 3663 (I think?) that I judged recently (can't remember which) that if
the Actor is explicitly named, and it's clear (with "on behalf") that it's an
act-on-behalf, the grammar of "On behalf of pokes, pokes does..." versus
"on behalf of pokes, I do" is inconsequential variation.
(It's based
> On Nov 13, 2018, at 10:02 AM, Kerim Aydin wrote:
>
>
>
> I vote {ATMunn, D. Margaux, Murphy} for PM.
>
> On behalf of pokes, pokes votes Endorse G. in the PM election.
Does this work? Intention is clear, but reads like e’s voting on behalf of
emself.
Gaelan
>
> On Sun, 11 Nov 2018,
I become a candidate for Rulekeepor.
On Sun, Nov 11, 2018, 11:34 Timon Walshe-Grey I become a candidate for Referee.
>
> -twg
>
>
> ‐‐‐ Original Message ‐‐‐
> On Sunday, November 11, 2018 6:15 PM, Edward Murphy
> wrote:
>
> > I initiate an Agoran decision to select the winner of the
If you think an SLR is close I won't work on it in parallel :).
The trick to avoiding an obligation as an Officer is to not hold the
office the instant a time limit expires (i.e. at the moment of the end
of the week or month).
You could hold the office all month and if you resign an instant
Not an awful lot, I'll admit. Late August and September are always quite busy
for me and I haven't really found time to get around to it. I have all the
information I need - Trigon did a prototype SLR a while ago, I also have
summaries of CFJs since the last FLR, and as Assessor I have been
On Sun, 9 Sep 2018, Timon Walshe-Grey wrote:
> (I do still plan to take over Rulekeepor in the future if nobody finds
> this objectionable, but I'm not yet prepared to do so.)
No pressure whatsoever, but have you put much work into this so far?
If I come to writing a land overhaul in a few
On Wed, 27 Sep 2017, Alex Smith wrote:
> On Wed, 2017-09-27 at 11:52 -0700, Kerim Aydin wrote:
> > Naw, it would be an attempt for a paradox win. Which doesn't exist
> > so I didn't do it. :)
>
> I'm pretty sure that particular paradox attempt (Epimenedes versus
> Truthiness) is one that's
On Wed, 2017-09-27 at 11:52 -0700, Kerim Aydin wrote:
> Naw, it would be an attempt for a paradox win. Which doesn't exist
> so I didn't do it. :)
I'm pretty sure that particular paradox attempt (Epimenedes versus
Truthiness) is one that's been thoroughly explored already. CFJ 1902 is
probably
Naw, it would be an attempt for a paradox win. Which doesn't exist so I didn't
do it. :)
On Wed, 27 Sep 2017, Aris Merchant wrote:
> Okay. You're still going to have trouble with the intent to mislead
> component though.
>
> -Aris
>
> On Wed, Sep 27, 2017 at 11:34 AM, Kerim Aydin
Okay. You're still going to have trouble with the intent to mislead
component though.
-Aris
On Wed, Sep 27, 2017 at 11:34 AM, Kerim Aydin wrote:
>
>
> E actually posted that comment to BUS for whatever reason (maybe just replying
> to emself and not the list-forwarded
E actually posted that comment to BUS for whatever reason (maybe just replying
to emself and not the list-forwarded copy, I dunno).
On Wed, 27 Sep 2017, Gaelan Steele wrote:
> Wait, does the lying ban cover DIS?
>
> Gaelan
>
> > On Sep 27, 2017, at 11:11 AM, Kerim Aydin
It doesn't.
-Aris
On Wed, Sep 27, 2017 at 11:31 AM, Gaelan Steele wrote:
> Wait, does the lying ban cover DIS?
>
> Gaelan
>
>> On Sep 27, 2017, at 11:11 AM, Kerim Aydin wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>>> On Thu, 28 Sep 2017, VJ Rada wrote:
>>> Ok, VJ this has been
Wait, does the lying ban cover DIS?
Gaelan
> On Sep 27, 2017, at 11:11 AM, Kerim Aydin wrote:
>
>
>
>> On Thu, 28 Sep 2017, VJ Rada wrote:
>> Ok, VJ this has been probably the worst, dumbest day for you in agora
>> nomic. Every damn message has been wrong.
>
> (G. is
On Thu, 28 Sep 2017, VJ Rada wrote:
> Ok, VJ this has been probably the worst, dumbest day for you in agora
> nomic. Every damn message has been wrong.
(G. is tempted to finger-point you for lying because this message isn't
wrong...)
> On Aug 23, 2017, at 9:42 PM, Alex Smith wrote:
>
> On Wed, 2017-08-23 at 21:24 -0400, Owen Jacobson wrote:
>> On Jun 27, 2017, at 2:09 AM, V.J Rada wrote:
>>
>>> Because I am rather bored, I initiate elections for Prime Minister,
>>> Herald and
On Wed, 2017-08-23 at 21:24 -0400, Owen Jacobson wrote:
> On Jun 27, 2017, at 2:09 AM, V.J Rada wrote:
>
> > Because I am rather bored, I initiate elections for Prime Minister,
> > Herald and Report or by announcement.
>
> As this appears not to have “stuck,” and as V.J Rada
On Jun 27, 2017, at 2:09 AM, V.J Rada wrote:
> Because I am rather bored, I initiate elections for Prime Minister, Herald
> and Report or by announcement.
As this appears not to have “stuck,” and as V.J Rada specifically requested
that someone finish the job:
I initiate
> On Jun 27, 2017, at 3:00 AM, Ørjan Johansen wrote:
>
> On Tue, 27 Jun 2017, Quazie wrote:
>
>> You aren't the ADOP, so you would need instead 4 support, but I'll get to
>> those elections shortly - don't worry
>
> Hum, it's not clear from the text of Rule 2154 that e
I endorse the current officer holder for all offices I do not hold. For offices
I do hold, I vote for myself.
Publius Scribonius Scholasticus
p.scribonius.scholasti...@gmail.com
> On Jun 26, 2017, at 11:09 PM, V.J Rada wrote:
>
> Because I am rather bored, I initiate
Yeah lmao that's how I read it. The natural reading of the plain text seems
to allow the ADOP to initiate one at any time and me to do so under the
conditions.
On Tuesday, June 27, 2017, Ørjan Johansen wrote:
> On Tue, 27 Jun 2017, Quazie wrote:
>
> You aren't the ADOP, so
>Because I am rather bored, I initiate elections for Prime Minister, Herald
>and Report or by announcement.
Hi rather bored, it's me dad.
On Tue, 27 Jun 2017, Quazie wrote:
You aren't the ADOP, so you would need instead 4 support, but I'll get to
those elections shortly - don't worry
Hum, it's not clear from the text of Rule 2154 that e cannot do that:
1. by announcement, if e is the ADoP, if the office has been
You aren't the ADOP, so you would need instead 4 support, but I'll get to
those elections shortly - don't worry
On Mon, Jun 26, 2017 at 23:09 V.J Rada wrote:
> Because I am rather bored, I initiate elections for Prime Minister, Herald
> and Report or by announcement.
On Tue, 2012-01-10 at 20:25 -0800, Ed Murphy wrote:
I initiate an election for Ambassador, nominating ais523, omd, and
Pavitra. (All are non-idle players of BlogNomic; I believe the only
others are scshunt [who recently resigned] and me [I don't want it].)
I would accept, but only if the rule
On Tue, Jan 10, 2012 at 11:39 PM, Aaron Goldfein
aarongoldf...@gmail.com wrote:
I state my support for southpointingchariot to support ais523 to hold this
position. I don't, however, support ais523.
I support ais523 to hold the position of Promotor. I order the fleet
at CotC to convoy the army
On Wed, 11 Jan 2012, Tanner Swett wrote:
On Tue, Jan 10, 2012 at 11:39 PM, Aaron Goldfein
aarongoldf...@gmail.com wrote:
I state my support for southpointingchariot to support ais523 to hold this
position. I don't, however, support ais523.
I support ais523 to hold the position of
I state my support for southpointingchariot to support ais523 to hold this
position. I don't, however, support ais523.
On Tue, Jan 10, 2012 at 22:34, southpointingchariot
southpointingchariot.no...@gmail.com wrote:
I state my support for ais523 to hold this position.
On Tue, Jan 10, 2012 at
On Mon, Oct 25, 2010 at 10:35 AM, Geoffrey Spear geoffsp...@gmail.com wrote:
I initiate Elections for each of the following offices and nominate
the corresponding player for the office.
ATC: G.
Fearmonger: Tiger
Granulator: Tanner L Swett
Pariah: ehird
PSM: Yally
Referee: Sgeo
I suggest
I nominate Murphy for PSM.
On May 8, 2010, at 11:03 AM, Sean Hunt ride...@gmail.com wrote:
I initiate an election for PSM, for Granulator, and for Chroniclor.
I nominate myself for Granulator and for Chroniclor.
-coppro
Pavitra wrote:
Anarchist: ehird, Yally, Tiger
denounce the Anarchist
That doesn't work, though arguably in a two-horse race it would be a
sufficiently obvious synonym for if the Anarchist votes for one
candidate, then I vote for the other one.
On Sat, 2009-03-14 at 03:15 -0500, Benjamin Caplan wrote:
Anarchist: ehird, Yally, Tiger
denounce the Anarchist
Is it even possible to denounce in an election where the choices aren't
FOR/AGAINST/ABSTAIN?
--
ais523
ehird wrote:
Herald: Sgeo, Yally, Goethe
G to tha oe to tha t-h-e
Tailor: Wooble, ais523
ais to tha 5 to tha 23
Anarchist: ehird, Yally, Tiger
e to tha hird
You kids get off my lizawn!
32 matches
Mail list logo