Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Judgement, CFJ 3164

2012-04-03 Thread omd
On Tue, Apr 3, 2012 at 12:07 AM, Kerim Aydin ke...@u.washington.edu wrote: A non-player should not be under obligation to pay attention to any forum. Adding penalties that require action (to avoid accumulating more penalties) create this requirement for a non-player. I think I agree with you,

DIS: Re: BUS: Judgement, CFJ 3164

2012-04-02 Thread Tanner Swett
On Mon, Apr 2, 2012 at 5:00 PM, ais523 callforjudgem...@yahoo.co.uk wrote: Giving COMMUNITY SERVICE or APOLOGY would violate rule 101, as far as I can tell, due to harassing non-players. Rule 101 states that penalties shall not unduly harass a non-player if e wishes to ignore the game, so I

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Judgement, CFJ 3164

2012-04-02 Thread Kerim Aydin
On Mon, 2 Apr 2012, Tanner Swett wrote: On Mon, Apr 2, 2012 at 5:00 PM, ais523 callforjudgem...@yahoo.co.uk wrote: Giving COMMUNITY SERVICE or APOLOGY would violate rule 101, as far as I can tell, due to harassing non-players. Rule 101 states that penalties shall not unduly harass a