On Mon, 25 Jun 2018, Rebecca wrote:
I do so.
You were too late as proposal 8050 passed, and pledges are no longer
retractable.
Fortunately that doesn't matter, as all your pledges were older than 60
days.
Greetings,
Ørjan.
On Fri, Jun 15, 2018 at 9:02 AM, Ned Strange wrote:
Without o
I'm assuming this is the location to complain about a-o being messed up.
I've been out of town and haven't read through this thread really well.
I cannot log into the a-o private archives. Every time I try to, it just
takes me to the login screen again. It works with a-b and a-d though.
On 6/
I did the same. I asked for people to respond if it was received, and
there were no responses. In fact, I normally receive a copy of my own
messages, and I didn't with this one.
On 6/17/2018 3:09 AM, Timon Walshe-Grey wrote:
Not sure if this helps, but I sent a test email to Official on Friday
Well, my email address is a gmail one, but I'm using Thunderbird to view
the emails. If it's a problem with Gmail, then it's a problem with
Google's servers, not the client.
On 6/16/2018 7:22 PM, Aris Merchant wrote:
Okay, anyone using gmail didn't receive it. However, this can't just be
gmail
Not sure if this helps, but I sent a test email to Official on Friday to try
and narrow down the problem. It hasn't even showed up in the list at
mail-archive.com, let alone been delivered to anybody.
-twg
‐‐‐ Original Message ‐‐‐
On June 16, 2018 11:22 PM, Aris Merchant
wrote:
>
Okay, anyone using gmail didn't receive it. However, this can't just be
gmail's fault, because plenty of people who aren't using gmail also haven't
received it. I'm quite confused. It would be great if those who have
received the messages could look at the headers and see if anything looks
differen
same
On Sun, Jun 17, 2018 at 12:41 AM, ATMunn wrote:
> The original message? No, I haven't received it.
>
> On 6/15/2018 4:45 PM, Aris Merchant wrote:
>>
>> Poll: Who has and hasn't received the email? Please reply, and we'll use
>> the honor system.
>>
>> -Aris
>>
>> On Fri, Jun 15, 2018 at 1:43
The original message? No, I haven't received it.
On 6/15/2018 4:45 PM, Aris Merchant wrote:
Poll: Who has and hasn't received the email? Please reply, and we'll use
the honor system.
-Aris
On Fri, Jun 15, 2018 at 1:43 PM Kerim Aydin wrote:
On Fri, 15 Jun 2018, Aris Merchant wrote:
Oops.
Me too.
Greetings,
Ørjan.
On Fri, 15 Jun 2018, Corona wrote:
I'm in the same situation.
~Corona
On Fri, Jun 15, 2018 at 10:53 PM, Aris Merchant <
thoughtsoflifeandligh...@gmail.com> wrote:
On Fri, Jun 15, 2018 at 1:48 PM Kerim Aydin
wrote:
On Fri, 15 Jun 2018, Aris Merchant wrote:
Oo
I don't seem to have it.
Greetings,
Ørjan.
On Fri, 15 Jun 2018, Aris Merchant wrote:
Poll: Who has and hasn't received the email? Please reply, and we'll use
the honor system.
-Aris
On Fri, Jun 15, 2018 at 1:43 PM Kerim Aydin wrote:
On Fri, 15 Jun 2018, Aris Merchant wrote:
Oops. Yeah,
On Fri, 15 Jun 2018, Cuddle Beam wrote:
I'm paranoid.
*adjusts tinfoil hat*
Are you sure that's genuine tin, and not the aluminum substitute the world
government has stealthily fooled nearly everyone into using?
Greetings,
Ørjan.
I am in the same boat. From now until this is resolved, I would request
that all messages be sent to BAK or BUS, as opposed to OFF.
On 06/15/2018 04:53 PM, Aris Merchant wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 15, 2018 at 1:48 PM Kerim Aydin wrote:
>
>>
>> On Fri, 15 Jun 2018, Aris Merchant wrote:
>>> Oops. Yeah, I
I favor this CFJ.
On 06/15/2018 04:36 PM, Aris Merchant wrote:
> Oops. Yeah, I'm pretty sure that one has been resolved. I retract my prior
> CFJ, and CFJ "Proposal 8050 has been resolved."
>
> -Aris
>
> On Fri, Jun 15, 2018 at 1:34 PM Kerim Aydin wrote:
>
>>
>> Er, might want to check the Propos
How is your email set up?
-Aris
On Fri, Jun 15, 2018 at 1:54 PM Timon Walshe-Grey wrote:
> I don't believe I've received this second attempt either.
>
> -twg
>
>
> ‐‐‐ Original Message ‐‐‐
>
> On June 15, 2018 8:45 PM, Kerim Aydin wrote:
>
> >
> >
> > On Fri, 15 Jun 2018, Aris Me
I'm in the same situation.
~Corona
On Fri, Jun 15, 2018 at 10:53 PM, Aris Merchant <
thoughtsoflifeandligh...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 15, 2018 at 1:48 PM Kerim Aydin
> wrote:
>
> >
> >
> > On Fri, 15 Jun 2018, Aris Merchant wrote:
> > > Oops. Yeah, I'm pretty sure that one has been reso
oh my, taral was the distributor before omd. I think the change was around
2006.
On Fri, 15 Jun 2018, Aris Merchant wrote:
> Okay, I'm starting to develop a theory here. The agora-official list
> is configured differently than the other two. It's owner is listed as
> "taralx at gmail.com" wh
Okay, I'm starting to develop a theory here. The agora-official list
is configured differently than the other two. It's owner is listed as
"taralx at gmail.com" whereas the others are owned by "owner-spamfilt
at agoranomic.org". I think we need to send a "something weird is
happening" report to omd
Ugh. I'll send it to Business and BAK.
OFF is still the one where the mailman archive is broken, too.
On Fri, 15 Jun 2018, Timon Walshe-Grey wrote:
> I don't believe I've received this second attempt either.
>
> -twg
>
>
> ‐‐‐ Original Message ‐‐‐
>
> On June 15, 2018 8:45 PM, K
I don't believe I've received this second attempt either.
-twg
‐‐‐ Original Message ‐‐‐
On June 15, 2018 8:45 PM, Kerim Aydin wrote:
>
>
> On Fri, 15 Jun 2018, Aris Merchant wrote:
>
> > Oops. Yeah, I'm pretty sure that one has been resolved. I retract my prior
> >
> > CFJ, an
Sorry, was about to get around to responding to this chain.
I have NOT received the email resolving proposals 8050-8052. It's not in my
spam folder either.
-twg
‐‐‐ Original Message ‐‐‐
On June 15, 2018 8:45 PM, Aris Merchant
wrote:
>
>
> Poll: Who has and hasn't received the
On Fri, 15 Jun 2018, Aris Merchant wrote:
> Oops. Yeah, I'm pretty sure that one has been resolved. I retract my prior
> CFJ, and CFJ "Proposal 8050 has been resolved."
Except now - haha - I made a second, hopefully successful attempt to resolve a
few moments *before* this second CFJ came in, s
https://i.gyazo.com/bf99d85e20f8a18ef447acdb3b4339ae.png
For some reason it's hitting my spam inbox.
On Fri, Jun 15, 2018 at 10:45 PM, Aris Merchant <
thoughtsoflifeandligh...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Poll: Who has and hasn't received the email? Please reply, and we'll use
> the honor system.
>
> -Ar
Poll: Who has and hasn't received the email? Please reply, and we'll use
the honor system.
-Aris
On Fri, Jun 15, 2018 at 1:43 PM Kerim Aydin wrote:
>
>
> On Fri, 15 Jun 2018, Aris Merchant wrote:
> > Oops. Yeah, I'm pretty sure that one has been resolved. I retract my
> prior
> > CFJ, and CFJ "
I'm paranoid.
*adjusts tinfoil hat*
On Fri, 15 Jun 2018 at 17:40, Corona wrote:
> T.T I couldn't have acted on that intent any earlier than next Tuesday, and
> the dynasty will definitely be over by then.
>
> ~Corona
>
> On Fri, Jun 15, 2018 at 3:24 PM, Cuddle Beam wrote:
>
> > I object to Cor
Er, might want to check the Proposal # in the CFJ statement...
I'll re-send the resolution to converge the gamestate in case it failed
before. I think the only things I did for zombies were announcements-of-
intent so I don't think the time difference breaks anything (yet!)
On Fri, 15 Jun 20
Did you ever resolve proposal 8050? I certainly can't find a resolution...
-Aris
On Fri, Jun 15, 2018 at 9:09 AM Kerim Aydin wrote:
>
>
> You couldn't have anyway because PLEDGES CAN NO LONGER BE DESTROYED,
> WITHOUT OBJECTION OR OTHERWISE.
>
> They can't be destroyed at all because they're no
You couldn't have anyway because PLEDGES CAN NO LONGER BE DESTROYED,
WITHOUT OBJECTION OR OTHERWISE.
They can't be destroyed at all because they're no longer assets. Please read
Proposal 8050 - the only way for a pledge to end is to time out (and that
doesn't outright "destroy" it, it just m
T.T I couldn't have acted on that intent any earlier than next Tuesday, and
the dynasty will definitely be over by then.
~Corona
On Fri, Jun 15, 2018 at 3:24 PM, Cuddle Beam wrote:
> I object to Corona’s attempt, because the dynasty isn’t over just yet (will
> be soon though).
>
> On Fri, 15 Ju
28 matches
Mail list logo
