Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Proposal: s/object/either

2009-06-07 Thread Alex Smith
On Sat, 2009-06-06 at 16:04 -0700, Ed Murphy wrote: Goethe wrote: On Sat, 6 Jun 2009, Ed Murphy wrote: A player CAN flip a specified proposal to Distributable with 3 support, or without objection, or by spending 1 Note. Why bother with distributability then. -G. To

DIS: Re: BUS: Proposal: s/object/either

2009-06-06 Thread Kerim Aydin
On Sat, 6 Jun 2009, Ed Murphy wrote: A player CAN flip a specified proposal to Distributable with 3 support, or without objection, or by spending 1 Note. Why bother with distributability then. -G.

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Proposal: s/object/either

2009-06-06 Thread Ed Murphy
Goethe wrote: On Sat, 6 Jun 2009, Ed Murphy wrote: A player CAN flip a specified proposal to Distributable with 3 support, or without objection, or by spending 1 Note. Why bother with distributability then. -G. To avoid going through the motions for proposals that no one else is

DIS: Re: BUS: Proposal: s/object/either

2009-06-06 Thread Benjamin Caplan
Ed Murphy wrote: coppro wrote: Ed Murphy wrote: Proposal: s/object/either (AI = 2, please) Amend Rule 1607 (The Promotor) by replacing the sentence beginning A player CAN flip a specified proposal to Distributable with the following sentence: A player CAN flip a specified

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Proposal: s/object/either

2009-06-06 Thread Ed Murphy
Pavitra wrote: I support. NttPF

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Proposal: s/object/either

2009-06-06 Thread Kerim Aydin
On Sat, 6 Jun 2009, Ed Murphy wrote: Goethe wrote: On Sat, 6 Jun 2009, Ed Murphy wrote: A player CAN flip a specified proposal to Distributable with 3 support, or without objection, or by spending 1 Note. Why bother with distributability then. -G. To avoid going through the