On Thu, 15 Aug 2019 at 10:48, D. Margaux wrote:
> > On Aug 15, 2019, at 6:41 AM, Kerim Aydin wrote:
> >
> > * R869 doesn't prohibit rules or proposals from making a non-player a
> > player.
>
> That may be true. But it does prevent a proposal from using the method of
> "registration" to
> On Aug 15, 2019, at 6:41 AM, Kerim Aydin wrote:
>
> * R869 doesn't prohibit rules or proposals from making a non-player a
> player.
That may be true. But it does prevent a proposal from using the method of
"registration" to make a person become a player if that person recently
I think this was meant to go to DIS.
-- Forwarded message -
From: Edward Murphy
Date: Wed, Aug 14, 2019 at 4:55 AM
Subject: Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Re: OFF: [Arbitor] CFJ 3764 Assigned to D. Margaux
To: Kerim Aydin
G. wrote:
> On 8/3/2019 12:16 PM, D. Margaux wrote:
> &g
On Sat, 3 Aug 2019 at 23:37, Kerim Aydin wrote:
> If the proposal created a power 3.1 rule that said "nch is registered"
> then we could use rule 1030, but that's not what the clause does.
I think at this point it would only save nch one week, so I don't know
if I will bother submitting this.
On 8/3/2019 4:42 PM, Jason Cobb wrote:
> On 8/3/19 7:37 PM, Kerim Aydin wrote:
>> We added "rules to the contrary notwithstanding" to
>> R2140 to solve that - but R2140 still only applies to instruments below
>> power-3.
>
>
> How does that solve the problem? If I understand the issue
On 8/3/19 7:37 PM, Kerim Aydin wrote:
We added "rules to the contrary notwithstanding" to
R2140 to solve that - but R2140 still only applies to instruments below
power-3.
How does that solve the problem? If I understand the issue correctly,
the power-1 rule wouldn't be blocked by R2140,
On 8/3/2019 3:57 PM, Nich Evans wrote:
>> R849 clearly prohibits the registration. The "Comptrollor" ban we added
>> in R2140 recently to prevent lower-powered rules from prohibiting proposal
>> clauses in higher-powered proposals doesn't apply, because R2140 includes
>> the "below the power
On 8/3/19 2:16 PM, D. Margaux wrote:
On Fri, Aug 2, 2019 at 8:14 PM Kerim Aydin wrote:
The below CFJ is 3764. I assign it to D. Margaux.
=== CFJ 3764 ===
If a proposal purporting to register nch was adopted now, then one
On 8/3/19 2:36 PM, Kerim Aydin wrote:
On 8/3/2019 12:16 PM, D. Margaux wrote:
> Judged FALSE. NCH voluntarily deregistered less than 30 days ago. Under
> Rule 849, if a player does that, then "e CANNOT register or be
registered
> for 30 days." In my opinion, a proposal "purporting to register
On 8/3/19 2:16 PM, D. Margaux wrote:
In my opinion, a proposal "purporting to register nch" would
constitute an attempt to have nch "be registered" less than 30 days after
his voluntary deregistration. That attempt necessarily fails under Rule
849.
Please use spivak or gender neutral 'they'
On 8/3/2019 12:16 PM, D. Margaux wrote:
> Judged FALSE. NCH voluntarily deregistered less than 30 days ago. Under
> Rule 849, if a player does that, then "e CANNOT register or be registered
> for 30 days." In my opinion, a proposal "purporting to register nch" would
> constitute an attempt to
11 matches
Mail list logo
