Yeah, I could have phrased that a lot better, couldn't I? Sorry. :P
If Murphy chooses not to address the 2019 election (or doesn't notice the
dates) I will resubmit the CFJ with better grammar.
-twg
‐‐‐ Original Message ‐‐‐
On Wednesday, June 12, 2019 3:10 PM, Kerim Aydin wrote:
>
>
On Jun 12, 2019, at 12:28 PM, Kerim Aydin wrote:
>> On Wed, Jun 12, 2019 at 8:40 AM D. Margaux wrote:
>> Under R2154, “In a timely fashion after the nomination period ends, the ADoP
>> CAN and SHALL” initiate an Agoran decision to resolve that PM “election.”
>
> ...
>
> Obviously the flipp
On Wed, Jun 12, 2019 at 8:40 AM D. Margaux wrote:
> Under R2154, “In a timely fashion after the nomination period ends, the ADoP
> CAN and SHALL” initiate an Agoran decision to resolve that PM “election.”
IMO one of the biggest recurring grammatical issues in the Rules is
whether "CAN and SHALL
Oh wow. That’s funny. I didn’t even notice that that was for a prior year
election. Lol.
This made me notice another big problem. There is an ongoing “election” under
Rule 2154, and I don’t think there’s any way to terminate it!
Here’s why:
Several weeks ago, an “election” for PM was “initia
It's trivially TRUE in the context of the ~July 6 election (and based on
how the CFJ is worded, that's enough for a trivial TRUE without addressing
the current election, that twg was intending to address).
BUT, in terms of the matter twg was trying to get at, Corona gave consent in
the context
Gratuitous arguement: Seems to be TRUE to me. Corona subsequently
became a zombie, but I see no rules that would retract a player's
consent to holding office upon becoming a zombie, nor are there any
prohibitions against zombies being elected to offices. Not sure what
I'm missing, but seems stra
6 matches
Mail list logo
