DIS: Test

Hello? This message contains no game actions. -- Janet Cobb Assessor, Rulekeepor, S​tonemason

Re: DIS: Test 2

On 4/11/23 15:44, Yachay Wayllukuq via agora-discussion wrote: I scheduled them to send at the exact same time (Test 1 before Test 2) Ah interesting. My guess is that when you schedule the client sets the Date to the scheduled time, even if it doesn't actually *send* at the scheduled time.

Re: DIS: Test 2

I scheduled them to send at the exact same time (Test 1 before Test 2) On Tue, Apr 11, 2023 at 10:40 PM nix via agora-discussion < agora-discussion@agoranomic.org> wrote: > On 4/11/23 15:00, Yachay Wayllukuq via agora-discussion wrote: > > I'm testing something, sorry for the inconvenience > The

Re: DIS: Test 2

On 4/11/23 15:00, Yachay Wayllukuq via agora-discussion wrote: I'm testing something, sorry for the inconvenience The time between your DATE and the first received on these messages seems longer than your previous messages (or other players'). Did you schedule these, or do something to the

DIS: Test 2

I'm testing something, sorry for the inconvenience

DIS: Test 1

I'm testing something, sorry for the inconvenience

DIS: Test Post Please Ignore [Herald]

Just testing a filter. -- nix Herald

DIS: Test

This message contains no game actions. -- Jason Cobb Assessor, Rulekeepor, S​tonemason

Re: DIS: Test

Jason wrote: I intend, without objection, to intend, without objection, to declare Apathy. [G. suggested the archives went down on Discord.] https://scarfolk.blogspot.com/2015/08/no-1973-1975.html

Re: DIS: Test

On Mon, Jun 21, 2021 at 11:44 AM Jason Cobb via agora-discussion < agora-discussion@agoranomic.org> wrote: > I intend, without objection, to intend, without objection, to declare > Apathy. > > [G. suggested the archives went down on Discord.] > > -- > Jason Cobb > > Assessor, Rulekeepor,

DIS: Test

I intend, without objection, to intend, without objection, to declare Apathy. [G. suggested the archives went down on Discord.] -- Jason Cobb Assessor, Rulekeepor, S​tonemason

DIS: test

test -- Falsifian

DIS: Test

This message contains no game actions. -- Jason Cobb Assessor, Rulekeepor, S​tonemason

DIS: Test

This is a test message and contains no actions.

DIS: test

Test, sorry for the spam. The list was down for about 7 hours today because I messed something up while upgrading the server to be fully 64-bit. Sorry. (i386 in 2020? Absurd!)

Re: DIS: Test

On Wed, 2020-11-11 at 18:41 +, Gaelan Steele via agora-discussion wrote: > I intend, without objection, to figure out if the lists are quiet or > down. I support. -- ais523

DIS: Test

I intend, without objection, to figure out if the lists are quiet or down. Gaelan

DIS: test

I intend, without objection, to determine whether the list is working again.

DIS: Test

This is only a test. This message contains no game actions. -- Jason Cobb

DIS: Test

This message contains no game actions. This just a test to see if the fora are working properly again. -Aris

DIS: Test

No doubt this message will spur a flurry of suspicion and precautionary objections, but after being stuck with a temporary email client for a month, my main email client has started working for receiving Agoran email again. I'm therefore hoping that it will also be currently capable of sending,

DIS: Test (double spacing)

=Metareport= This is the ADoP’s weekly report Date of last report: 2020-06-21 Date of this report: 2020-06-28 MISCELLANEOUS INFO -- Filled offices: 15/15 (100%) Total officers: 10 Consolidation[1]: 1.5 Late reports: 0%

DIS: Test Post, Please Ignore

Playing around with KMail and the protonmail bridge. --- Nch

DIS: Test

1... 2... 3... testing. -Aris

Re: DIS: test

On 2/14/20 2:26 PM, Jason Cobb wrote: > On 2/14/20 2:25 PM, Jason Cobb via agora-discussion wrote: >> Getting some failure notices for a certain message, I want to see if >> it's only for that message. >> >> -- Jason Cobb > > Looks like it is, since I got this back (w/o failure notice). > Oh,

Re: DIS: test

On 2/14/20 2:25 PM, Jason Cobb via agora-discussion wrote: > Getting some failure notices for a certain message, I want to see if > it's only for that message. > > -- Jason Cobb Looks like it is, since I got this back (w/o failure notice). -- Jason Cobb

DIS: test

Getting some failure notices for a certain message, I want to see if it's only for that message. -- Jason Cobb

Re: DIS: test

On 2/2/20 9:15 PM, omd via agora-discussion wrote: > On Sun, Feb 2, 2020 at 6:01 PM comex wrote: >> Now testing if Haraka can deliver to everyone. > ...except that didn't actually use Haraka because I sent from the > wrong address. This time for real. Received, if it helps. -- Jason Cobb

Re: DIS: test

On Sun, Feb 2, 2020 at 6:01 PM comex wrote: > Now testing if Haraka can deliver to everyone. ...except that didn't actually use Haraka because I sent from the wrong address. This time for real.

Re: DIS: test

On Sun, Feb 2, 2020 at 5:11 PM comexk--- via agora-discussion wrote: > Nothing to see here, move along. Now testing if Haraka can deliver to everyone.

DIS: test

Nothing to see here, move along.

DIS: test 2

my filters work differently if the subject is munged with "DIS" etc. this is testing that part of the filter.

Re: DIS: test

On Sun, 22 Dec 2019, omd wrote: Will Gmail deliver a list message if it's sent from a different IP? Maybe this is a good time to remind you (you never responded to my original message) that back in June/July (I think) I had trouble receiving list email because the list IP got on a global

Re: DIS: test should fail

Never mind; I eventually got "Yeah ... I was trying" at 03:59 UTC. On Mon, 23 Dec 2019 at 03:52, James Cook wrote: > > I got "Testing my new address filter." but not "Yeah... I was trying > to send from an unsubscribed address, ...". > > > On Mon, 23 Dec 2019 at 03:49, Jason Cobb wrote: > > >

Re: DIS: test should fail

I got "Testing my new address filter." but not "Yeah... I was trying to send from an unsubscribed address, ...". On Mon, 23 Dec 2019 at 03:49, Jason Cobb wrote: > > On 12/22/19 10:35 PM, Nicholas Allegra wrote: > > I received this, but not Falsifian's reply nor the one that says > "Testing my

Re: DIS: test

On 12/22/19 10:34 PM, omd wrote: Testing my new address filter. On Sun, Dec 22, 2019 at 3:25 PM omd wrote: Will Gmail deliver a list message if it's sent from a different IP? Sorry, just received this; disregard my previous message. -- Jason Cobb

Re: DIS: test should fail

On 12/22/19 10:35 PM, Nicholas Allegra wrote: I received this, but not Falsifian's reply nor the one that says "Testing my new address filter." -- Jason Cobb

Re: DIS: test should fail

On Sun, Dec 22, 2019 at 7:37 PM James Cook wrote: > I got this one. Yeah... I was trying to send from an unsubscribed address, but I didn't realize that when sending from an alias, Gmail would keep my normal address in the envelope. Whoops.

Re: DIS: test should fail

I got this one. On Mon, 23 Dec 2019 at 03:36, Nicholas Allegra wrote: > > -- - Falsifian

DIS: test should fail

Re: DIS: test

Testing my new address filter. On Sun, Dec 22, 2019 at 3:25 PM omd wrote: > > Will Gmail deliver a list message if it's sent from a different IP?

Re: DIS: test

On Sun, 22 Dec 2019 at 23:25, Jason Cobb wrote: > On 12/22/19 6:24 PM, omd wrote: > > Will Gmail deliver a list message if it's sent from a different IP? > > Received. > > -- > Jason Cobb I got both these messages, but GMail attached the note "This message was not sent to Spam because of a

Re: DIS: test

On 12/22/19 6:24 PM, omd wrote: Will Gmail deliver a list message if it's sent from a different IP? Received. -- Jason Cobb

DIS: test

Will Gmail deliver a list message if it's sent from a different IP?

Re: DIS: Test of a-d

On Sun, 2019-11-03 at 10:58 -0800, Edward Murphy via agora-discussion wrote: > This is a test of what happens if I don't add "DIS:" to the subject > line ahead of time. I received this (and the a-b and a-o versions too). The mailing list rewrote the "From:" line in order to prevent a DMARC

DIS: Test of a-d

This is a test of what happens if I don't add "DIS:" to the subject line ahead of time.

DIS: test

test Sent with [ProtonMail](https://protonmail.com) Secure Email.

DIS: test post the third

third time's the charm (or not)

Re: DIS: test post

Actually I was testing if my new email was subscribed correctly (yes, obviously), and if my filters put the returning message in the right place (no they didn't, but I'll try to minimize tests to fix that). On 12/28/2018 8:42 AM, Timon Walshe-Grey wrote: I received this, if that's what you

Re: DIS: test post

I received this, if that's what you were trying to test. -twg ‐‐‐ Original Message ‐‐‐ On Friday, December 28, 2018 4:24 PM, Kerim Aydin wrote: > testing new email filters

DIS: test post

testing new email filters

Re: DIS: Test (not a report)

I messed around with some settings and now it is working properly. On Mon, Jul 16, 2018 at 11:56 AM Timon Walshe-Grey wrote: > > I figured it might be interesting to see whether Unicode box-drawing > characters actually have wide support these days. How does it look to the > rest of you? > >

Re: DIS: Test (not a report)

needs an explicit declaration of monospace typestyle: [image: needs monospace.PNG] ​Here it is in monospace, gmail's "fixed width" option: > ┌─┬┬┬┬┬┬┬┬┬┬┐ > │Entity │Ston│Appl│Corn│ Ore│Lmbr│Cotn│Coin│Papr│Fabr│Incs│ >

Re: DIS: Test (not a report)

Looks sharp/nice/correct to me. With the usual exception of that Japanese line (but it's less out-of-line then other reports have been). On Mon, 16 Jul 2018, Timon Walshe-Grey wrote: > I figured it might be interesting to see whether Unicode box-drawing > characters > actually have wide

Re: DIS: Test (not a report)

Hmm. Perhaps an experiment to shelve for the time being. 樂 -twg ​​ ‐‐‐ Original Message ‐‐‐ On July 16, 2018 3:57 PM, Publius Scribonius Scholasticus wrote: > ​​ > > =E2=94=8C=E2=94=80=E2=94=80=E2=94=80=E2=94=80=E2=94=80=E2=94=80=E2=94=80=E2= > >

Re: DIS: Test (not a report)

=E2=94=8C=E2=94=80=E2=94=80=E2=94=80=E2=94=80=E2=94=80=E2=94=80=E2=94=80=E2= =94=80=E2=94=80=E2=94=80=E2=94=80=E2=94=80=E2=94=80=E2=94=80=E2=94=80=E2=94= =80=E2=94=80=E2=94=80=E2=94=80=E2=94=80=E2=94=80=E2=94=AC=E2=94=80=E2=94=80=

DIS: Test (not a report)

I figured it might be interesting to see whether Unicode box-drawing characters actually have wide support these days. How does it look to the rest of you? -twg ┌─┬┬┬┬┬┬┬┬┬┬┐ │Entity │Ston│Appl│Corn│

DIS: Test

Testing server. -Aris

Re: DIS: Test

*HTML preformatted style, perhaps?* *+---++++---+++++++ * *|Entity |Ston|Appl|Corn|Ore|Lmbr|Cotn|Coin|Papr|Fabr|Incs| * *+---++++---+++++++ * *|ATMunn

Re: DIS: Test

Why... How do you all make the tables??? (Let me try reposting Gaelan's previous report) +---++++---++++++ |*Entity |Ston|Appl|Corn|Ore|Lmbr|Cotn|Coin|Papr|Fabr|

DIS: Test

Testing the tables +---++++---+++++++ |Entity |Ston|Appl|Corn|Ore|Lmbr|Cotn|Coin|Papr|Fabr|Incs| +---++++---+++++++ |ATMunn | 10| 35| 0| 0|

Re: DIS: test message please ignore

My nickname: dragging Agora to like 1992 in terms of internationalization of its encoding. 天火狐 On 22 November 2017 at 19:59, ATMunn wrote: > Yeah, I've noticed this as well, it happens in my text editor as well. I > tend to go with the approach of having the | be in

Re: DIS: test message please ignore

Yeah, I've noticed this as well, it happens in my text editor as well. I tend to go with the approach of having the | be in the same column. On 11/22/2017 7:56 PM, Alex Smith wrote: On Thu, 2017-11-23 at 11:45 +1100, Madeline wrote: Telnaior| 天火狐 | Trigon | Telnaior|

Re: DIS: test message please ignore

On Wed, 22 Nov 2017 at 19:57 Alex Smith wrote: > On Thu, 2017-11-23 at 11:45 +1100, Madeline wrote: > > > Telnaior| > > > 天火狐 | > > > Trigon | > > > > > Telnaior| > > > 天火狐 | > > > Trigon | > > > > > Telnaior| > > > 天火狐 | > > >

Re: DIS: test message please ignore

On Thu, 2017-11-23 at 11:45 +1100, Madeline wrote: > > Telnaior| > > 天火狐 | > > Trigon | > > > Telnaior| > > 天火狐 | > > Trigon | > > > Telnaior| > > 天火狐 | > > Trigon | According to the Unicode standards, the vast majority of Japanese characters

DIS: test message please ignore

| Telnaior    | | 天火狐 | | Trigon  | | Telnaior    | | 天火狐   | | Trigon  | | Telnaior    | | 天火狐  | | Trigon  |

Re: DIS: Test

> On Sep 22, 2017, at 4:34 AM, Alex Smith wrote: > > Possibly the first time one of these /isn't/ a timing scam? > > It's possible my email problems have been resolved, at least with > respect to sending. If this message gets through, presumably others > will too. I

Re: DIS: Test

me too. On Fri, Sep 22, 2017 at 7:43 PM, Publius Scribonius Scholasticus wrote: > I received this. > > Publius Scribonius Scholasticus > p.scribonius.scholasti...@gmail.com > > > >> On Sep 22, 2017, at 4:34 AM, Alex Smith

Re: DIS: Test

I received this. Publius Scribonius Scholasticus p.scribonius.scholasti...@gmail.com > On Sep 22, 2017, at 4:34 AM, Alex Smith wrote: > > Possibly the first time one of these /isn't/ a timing scam? > > It's possible my email problems have been resolved, at

DIS: Test

Possibly the first time one of these /isn't/ a timing scam? It's possible my email problems have been resolved, at least with respect to sending. If this message gets through, presumably others will too. -- ais523

Re: DIS: test

Yeah, that was the thing I wanted to try to exploit. Unfortunately SLR and other stuff are not self-ratifying like other reports. On Wed, 20 Sep 2017 at 09:39, Owen Jacobson wrote: > > > On Sep 18, 2017, at 9:13 PM, Gaelan Steele wrote: > > > > This

Re: DIS: test

> On Sep 18, 2017, at 9:13 PM, Gaelan Steele wrote: > > This worries me. Is there something in the SLR that is incorrect? Given that > your scam doesn’t work, I see little harm in you sharing. > > Gaelan The “Estate Auctions” rule is missing a paragraph, I believe. -o

Re: DIS: test

On Tue, Sep 19, 2017 at 12:00 AM, Kerim Aydin wrote: > > > On Tue, 19 Sep 2017, Cuddle Beam wrote: > > test > > This concludes our test of the emergency scam response system. > > Had this been an actual working scam, it probably wouldn't have > involved CuddleBeam I

Re: DIS: test

On Tue, 19 Sep 2017, Cuddle Beam wrote: > test This concludes our test of the emergency scam response system. Had this been an actual working scam, it probably wouldn't have involved CuddleBeam.

Re: DIS: test

Auctions became unregulated. It was just "an auction" and such. Presumably I could just make my own. On Tue, Sep 19, 2017 at 3:21 AM, Ørjan Johansen wrote: > On Mon, 18 Sep 2017, Gaelan Steele wrote: > > This worries me. Is there something in the SLR that is incorrect? Given

Re: DIS: test

On Mon, 18 Sep 2017, Gaelan Steele wrote: This worries me. Is there something in the SLR that is incorrect? Given that your scam doesn’t work, I see little harm in you sharing. The last paragraph of rule 2491 is duplicated. I don't see how that allows any scam though... Greetings, Ørjan.

Re: DIS: test

This worries me. Is there something in the SLR that is incorrect? Given that your scam doesn’t work, I see little harm in you sharing. Gaelan > On Sep 18, 2017, at 5:58 PM, Cuddle Beam wrote: > > I don't have any email problems fortunately. I was trying to pull a scam

Re: DIS: test

I don't have any email problems fortunately. I was trying to pull a scam which relied on timing and I wanted to see what time appeared on the archives for my message to compare with a-o. Sorry for any concerns. Also, my scam didn't work because the SLR isn't self-ratifying and now I cry in a

Re: DIS: test

The implication that Cuddlebeam sending this email suggested e might be having email problems. Publius Scribonius Scholasticus p.scribonius.scholasti...@gmail.com > On Sep 18, 2017, at 8:52 PM, Ørjan Johansen wrote: > > I received it too (but already deleted it,

Re: DIS: test

I received it too (but already deleted it, after briefly seeing if I could spot anything funny in the headers but I didn't), what's wrong with it? Greetings, Ørjan. On Mon, 18 Sep 2017, Publius Scribonius Scholasticus wrote: I received this, but I concur with Aris this could be a problem. I

Re: DIS: test

I received this, but I concur with Aris this could be a problem. I am slightly concerned that gmail users may be forming a cult of their own. Publius Scribonius Scholasticus p.scribonius.scholasti...@gmail.com > On Sep 18, 2017, at 8:22 PM, Cuddle Beam wrote: > >

Re: DIS: test

Uh oh. -Aris On Mon, Sep 18, 2017 at 5:22 PM Cuddle Beam wrote: > test >

DIS: test

test

Re: DIS: Test

Would it be better if I write the subject tags myself? Publius Scribonius Scholasticus On Sat, May 20, 2017 at 9:50 PM, Alex Smith wrote: > On Sun, 2017-05-21 at 02:11 +0200, CuddleBeam wrote: > > Is this working? > > It's going to my spam folder, just like PSS's

Re: DIS: Test

On 05/20/2017 08:50 PM, Alex Smith wrote: On Sun, 2017-05-21 at 02:11 +0200, CuddleBeam wrote: Is this working? It's going to my spam folder, just like PSS's posts are, and no matter how many I mark as "not spam" it keeps happening. I distinctly remember having this problem a while back with

Re: DIS: Test

On Sat, May 20, 2017 at 6:31 PM, Nic Evans wrote: > I use it too, but nearly exclusively through a desktop client. Maybe it's a > problem with the web client? > > Nope. I mostly use the web client. -Aris

Re: DIS: Test

On Sun, 2017-05-21 at 02:11 +0200, CuddleBeam wrote: > Is this working? It's going to my spam folder, just like PSS's posts are, and no matter how many I mark as "not spam" it keeps happening. I can unstick them manually, but finding a long-term solution to this might well be helpful. (The DKIM

Re: DIS: Test

I use it too, but nearly exclusively through a desktop client. Maybe it's a problem with the web client? On 05/20/2017 08:27 PM, Aris Merchant wrote: On Sat, May 20, 2017 at 6:09 PM, CuddleBeam wrote: I've been trying to get this to work for months and now it

Re: DIS: Test

On Sat, May 20, 2017 at 6:09 PM, CuddleBeam wrote: > I've been trying to get this to work for months and now it finally works > lol, holy fuck. > > Kudos to PSS btw, he helped me out. Straight up gmail doesn't work > apparently but they taught me the googlemail.com

Re: DIS: Test

I've been trying to get this to work for months and now it finally works lol, holy fuck. Kudos to PSS btw, he helped me out. Straight up gmail doesn't work apparently but they taught me the googlemail.com trick and it works and I'm super grateful.

Re: DIS: Test

Yeah, I noticed, but I didn't want to point it out. Publius Scribonius Scholasticus On Sat, May 20, 2017 at 8:18 PM, Aris Merchant < thoughtsoflifeandligh...@gmail.com> wrote: > Actually, it should probably be ita vero. It's kind of scary how long I've > been doing that wrong. > > -Aris >

Re: DIS: Test

Actually, it should probably be ita vero. It's kind of scary how long I've been doing that wrong. -Aris On Sat, May 20, 2017 at 5:15 PM Publius Scribonius Scholasticus < p.scribonius.scholasti...@googlemail.com> wrote: > ​Yes. I appreciate the Latin.​ > > > Publius Scribonius Scholasticus

Re: DIS: Test

​Yes. I appreciate the Latin.​ Publius Scribonius Scholasticus On Sat, May 20, 2017 at 8:14 PM, Aris Merchant < thoughtsoflifeandligh...@gmail.com> wrote: > > On Sat, May 20, 2017 at 5:11 PM CuddleBeam > wrote: > >> Is this working? >> >> Ita vera. > > -Aris >

Re: DIS: Test

On Sat, May 20, 2017 at 5:11 PM CuddleBeam wrote: > Is this working? > > Ita vera. -Aris

DIS: Test

Is this working?

DIS: Test

I hereby identify (give an id number to) the following proposal(s): ID Author(s) AI Title - 7820^! Alexis, ais523 1.0 Official Clarification Legend: * : Proposal is pending. + : By publishing this

DIS: test

testing digest.

Re: DIS: test

One more test - this time I'm trying to fix the DIS: Re: problem.

Re: DIS: Test

On Mon, Sep 3, 2012 at 11:21 PM, Elliott Hird penguinoftheg...@googlemail.com wrote: ☃ BRR ITS COLD

Re: DIS: Test

On Mon, Sep 3, 2012 at 11:33 PM, omd c.ome...@gmail.com wrote: On Mon, Sep 3, 2012 at 11:21 PM, Elliott Hird penguinoftheg...@googlemail.com wrote: ☃ I create a promise with text ☃ and transfer it to ehird. ...and, in a separate message to avoid any question of whether this affects the

  1   2   >