This scam would be pretty dangerous. Initiating 495 excess cases would result
in at least that many blots if someone pointed a finger at me for it!
> On Jan 20, 2019, at 1:56 PM, Timon Walshe-Grey wrote:
>
> Upon examination of R2478, I think that falsely declaring a Finger Pointing
> to be
Yes, but you could award yourself a single blot as a fine for breaking the
pledge. But in any case i trust you not to break it regardless.
> On Jan 20, 2019, at 1:56 PM, Timon Walshe-Grey wrote:
>
> Upon examination of R2478, I think that falsely declaring a Finger Pointing
> to be
Upon examination of R2478, I think that falsely declaring a Finger Pointing to
be Shenanigans may be IMPOSSIBLE, or if not, is certainly ILLEGAL. And that
would be a violation that the Arbitor _could_ take over the investigation of.
-twg
‐‐‐ Original Message ‐‐‐
On Wednesday, January
On Wed, Jan 16, 2019 at 9:44 AM Kerim Aydin wrote:
>
>
> On 1/16/2019 12:48 AM, Timon Walshe-Grey wrote:
> > No, there's no need. I initiate an election for Assessor, beginning the
> > nomination period. This is a bad enough mistake (considering it's
> actually > the second time I've made it
On 1/16/2019 12:48 AM, Timon Walshe-Grey wrote:
> No, there's no need. I initiate an election for Assessor, beginning the
> nomination period. This is a bad enough mistake (considering it's
actually > the second time I've made it recently) that I don't think it would be
> right for me to
> On Jan 16, 2019, at 3:48 AM, Timon Walshe-Grey wrote:
>
> Even if I made that pledge, nobody would trust me, and rightly so.
FWIW, I would trust you if you made that pledge.
Theoretically, the pledge has a loophole if you’re the Referee, since you could
decide any pointer finger
6 matches
Mail list logo
