Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Re: OFF: [Assessor] Resolution of Proposals 8077B-8081B, 8082A-8085A, 8087A-8089A and 8096-8103

2018-10-02 Thread ais...@alumni.bham.ac.uk
On Tue, 2018-10-02 at 19:58 -0400, D Margaux wrote: > LOL. The Bank of Agora has caused quite a mess. The first Agoran > financial crisis, perhaps? "First Bank of Agora" is a pretty misleading name. There have been many Banks of Agora in the past. Many of these have been scammed, too. I once

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Re: OFF: [Assessor] Resolution of Proposals 8077B-8081B, 8082A-8085A, 8087A-8089A and 8096-8103

2018-10-02 Thread D Margaux
Haha, amazing. What a ridiculous game. :-) On Tue, Oct 2, 2018 at 8:01 PM Aris Merchant < thoughtsoflifeandligh...@gmail.com> wrote: > Oh no. Maybe the 30th or something. We usually have have a few each year. > > -Aris > > On Tue, Oct 2, 2018 at 4:58 PM D Margaux wrote: > > > LOL. The Bank of

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Re: OFF: [Assessor] Resolution of Proposals 8077B-8081B, 8082A-8085A, 8087A-8089A and 8096-8103

2018-10-02 Thread Aris Merchant
Oh no. Maybe the 30th or something. We usually have have a few each year. -Aris On Tue, Oct 2, 2018 at 4:58 PM D Margaux wrote: > LOL. The Bank of Agora has caused quite a mess. The first Agoran financial > crisis, perhaps? > > On Tue, Oct 2, 2018 at 7:52 PM Kerim Aydin wrote: > > > > > > >

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Re: OFF: [Assessor] Resolution of Proposals 8077B-8081B, 8082A-8085A, 8087A-8089A and 8096-8103

2018-10-02 Thread D Margaux
LOL. The Bank of Agora has caused quite a mess. The first Agoran financial crisis, perhaps? On Tue, Oct 2, 2018 at 7:52 PM Kerim Aydin wrote: > > > On Tue, 2 Oct 2018, Timon Walshe-Grey wrote: > > OK, please nobody do anything major with coins until these CFJs > > are judged, otherwise we may

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Re: OFF: [Assessor] Resolution of Proposals 8077B-8081B, 8082A-8085A, 8087A-8089A and 8096-8103

2018-10-02 Thread Kerim Aydin
On Tue, 2 Oct 2018, Timon Walshe-Grey wrote: > OK, please nobody do anything major with coins until these CFJs > are judged, otherwise we may end up with a horrible divergence. Well, I'm required to start a zombie auction this week, and it's not a divergence yet (if it turns out the votes

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Re: OFF: [Assessor] Resolution of Proposals 8077B-8081B, 8082A-8085A, 8087A-8089A and 8096-8103

2018-10-02 Thread Timon Walshe-Grey
Oh crap. Yes, you're right, I think - hadn't realised it before. That's incredibly confusing (though still, I think, unlikely to happen). OK, please nobody do anything major with coins until these CFJs are judged, otherwise we may end up with a horrible divergence. On the plus side, both the

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Re: OFF: [Assessor] Resolution of Proposals 8077B-8081B, 8082A-8085A, 8087A-8089A and 8096-8103

2018-10-02 Thread D Margaux
But just to clarify—if the CFJs find that G and i couldn’t transfer to the contract, then I think both of our votes (and our zombies’ votes) flip, causing the Point Installation Act to pass. Or is there some reason that wouldn’t occur in that situation? > On Oct 2, 2018, at 2:33 PM, Timon

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Re: OFF: [Assessor] Resolution of Proposals 8077B-8081B, 8082A-8085A, 8087A-8089A and 8096-8103

2018-10-02 Thread Kerim Aydin
Thanks both! Sorry, lots of messages crossing in the ether with the parts being replied to hidden. (D. Margaux, if we have any more CoEing or CFJing let's coordinate privately first :) ) On Tue, 2 Oct 2018, D Margaux wrote: > G.— Twg was referring to my conditional, not yours. > > > On

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Re: OFF: [Assessor] Resolution of Proposals 8077B-8081B, 8082A-8085A, 8087A-8089A and 8096-8103

2018-10-02 Thread D Margaux
G.— Twg was referring to my conditional, not yours. On Tue, Oct 2, 2018 at 2:31 PM Kerim Aydin wrote: > > > On Tue, 2 Oct 2018, Timon Walshe-Grey wrote: > > It's not a conditional _vote_, it's a conditional _action to change > > the vote_. You still submitted an unconditional vote; it's just

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Re: OFF: [Assessor] Resolution of Proposals 8077B-8081B, 8082A-8085A, 8087A-8089A and 8096-8103

2018-10-02 Thread Timon Walshe-Grey
That reply was in response to D. Margaux's similar CoE, not yours. I properly responded to your CoE by citing the appropriate CFJ. -twg ‐‐‐ Original Message ‐‐‐ On Tuesday, October 2, 2018 6:29 PM, Kerim Aydin wrote: > > > On Tue, 2 Oct 2018, Timon Walshe-Grey wrote: > > > It's not a

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Re: OFF: [Assessor] Resolution of Proposals 8077B-8081B, 8082A-8085A, 8087A-8089A and 8096-8103

2018-10-02 Thread Kerim Aydin
On Tue, 2 Oct 2018, Timon Walshe-Grey wrote: > It's not a conditional _vote_, it's a conditional _action to change > the vote_. You still submitted an unconditional vote; it's just that > the content of your vote is, er, conditional on something else. How on earth do you come up with that

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Re: OFF: [Assessor] Resolution of Proposals 8077B-8081B, 8082A-8085A, 8087A-8089A and 8096-8103

2018-10-02 Thread Timon Walshe-Grey
It's not a conditional _vote_, it's a conditional _action to change the vote_. You still submitted an unconditional vote; it's just that the content of your vote is, er, conditional on something else. -twg ‐‐‐ Original Message ‐‐‐ On Tuesday, October 2, 2018 6:01 PM, D Margaux wrote: