Re: DIS: Not a Switch Nuke

I think this applies CFJ 2120-2121 (called Aug 04, 2008): A requirement of the form 'within , a player SHALL by announcement' means that the player CAN perform the action, and SHALL do so within the time limit. On Tue, Feb 27, 2018 at 5:04 PM, Kerim Aydin

Re: DIS: Not a Switch Nuke

that was before we put in the requirement for the explicit CAN in R2125 this past October, specifically to plug that hole. On Tue, 27 Feb 2018, Cuddle Beam wrote: > I think this applies > > CFJ 2120-2121 (called Aug 04, 2008): > > A requirement of the form 'within , a player SHALL >by

DIS: Re: BUS: Re: OFF: [ADoP] Metareport

G. wrote: I withdraw my nomination for Reportor (if I nominated myself - can't remember). You didn't, but I think I'll need to update the ADoP UI to support that event (at least when someone actually does). That reminds me, I'll also remove Complexity from the report since that's no longer

Re: DIS: Not a Switch Nuke

Ah, well. OK. On Tue, Feb 27, 2018 at 6:18 PM, Kerim Aydin wrote: > > > that was before we put in the requirement for the explicit CAN in R2125 > this past October, specifically to plug that hole. > > On Tue, 27 Feb 2018, Cuddle Beam wrote: > > I think this applies > > >

Re: DIS: Not a Switch Nuke

I don't see a CAN in that sentence? On Tue, 27 Feb 2018, Cuddle Beam wrote: > "If Proprietary Land becomes Aether, the Cartographor SHALL transfer it to > Agora in a timely fashion, destroy any facilities on the Land Unit, > and set *all > other switches* to their default values." > > >all

Re: DIS: Fwd: Facilities owned by contracts incur no costs

Hi Kenyon, Question from Registrar: Did you attempt to register/become a player at any point? (Just looking at your "if I am a player..." below). Can't find an attempted registration. Also noting you sent the below CFJ attempt to agora-business-request, not agora-business. Also, you

Re: DIS: Fwd: Facilities owned by contracts incur no costs

That explains it. I think Gmail corrected to agora-business-request on both (since I had sent the confirmation email it thought that was what I wanted, I guess) and I didn't catch it. Joining soon. Since I am not a player, I do not free-CFJ. Kenyon On Feb 27, 2018 10:16 AM, "Kerim Aydin"

DIS: Re: BUS: Joining the game

I'm not sure how much retroactive magic is going to help. I think we need to go carefully over it, and then decide whether we need to start over from scratch. It's looking like we may want to, what with land auctions being broken and everything. Suggestions? -Aris On Tue, Feb 27, 2018 at 11:35

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Joining the game

I think the simplest solution here is to pass a patch proposal, then RWO our reports from this week. Cleans things up without any crazy retroactivity. Gaelan > On Feb 27, 2018, at 11:38 AM, Aris Merchant > wrote: > > I'm not sure how much retroactive

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Re: OFF: Feb 25 Land Auction and an Announcement.

Actually, nobody has any corn yet, so this was ineffective anyway. Would still like feedback on the proto. Gaelan > On Feb 26, 2018, at 6:48 PM, Gaelan Steele wrote: > > Did we ever decide what happens with payments for failed actions? My vague > recollection was that “I

DIS: Not a Switch Nuke

"If Proprietary Land becomes Aether, the Cartographor SHALL transfer it to Agora in a timely fashion, destroy any facilities on the Land Unit, and set *all other switches* to their default values." >all other switches Which means citizenship, ribbons, etc. Fortunately that rule is Power 2 and

Re: DIS: Not a Switch Nuke

I don't think it can happen. It's like if you use a single broomstick to flip all of the breakers off, but a few of the breakers can't move. You can't do it. It's "ALL" of the switches as a single process, not each individually. On Tue, Feb 27, 2018 at 10:56 AM, Alex Smith

Re: DIS: Not a Switch Nuke

On Tue, 2018-02-27 at 10:51 +0100, Cuddle Beam wrote: > "If Proprietary Land becomes Aether, the Cartographor SHALL transfer > it to > Agora in a timely fashion, destroy any facilities on the Land Unit, > and set *all > other switches* to their default values." > > > all other switches > > Which

Re: DIS: Not a Switch Nuke

On Tue, 2018-02-27 at 11:15 +0100, Cuddle Beam wrote: > I don't think it can happen. It's like if you use a single broomstick > to > flip all of the breakers off, but a few of the breakers can't move. > You > can't do it. It's "ALL" of the switches as a single process, not each > individually. On

Re: DIS: Fwd: About that secret project...

New Processing Facility: Temple? Turns tithe into forgiveness, lol. On Wed, Feb 28, 2018 at 1:36 AM, Kerim Aydin wrote: > > > Weevils were just my 5-minute thinking for "we're doing something that's > based on farming, what's a good word to re-skin Blots to something bad

Re: DIS: Fwd: About that secret project...

Weevils were just my 5-minute thinking for "we're doing something that's based on farming, what's a good word to re-skin Blots to something bad for a farmer?" I'd prefer not to re-use the term Blots, just because names identify different past eras, but happy to find a term fitting the

DIS: Fwd: About that secret project...

Forwarding a message from back when I was working on a judicial system proposal. I dropped it, after realizing that that 1) this kind of system needs to be written modularly, or it turns into a tightly bound mess and 2) I can't write modularly. However, this could perhaps be used as theme for G.'s

DIS: Re: OFF: [Registrar] Weekly Report

That's no longer the email I use for this game. Obviously not a COE because no ratification or anything. On Wed, Feb 28, 2018 at 6:51 AM, Kerim Aydin wrote: > > > >

Re: DIS: Re: OFF: [Registrar] Weekly Report

On Wed, 28 Feb 2018, Ned Strange wrote: > That's no longer the email I use for this game. Obviously not a COE > because no ratification or anything. Got it. Assuming you're using edwardostrange at gmail.com, let me know if different.

Re: DIS: Re: OFF: [Registrar] Weekly Report

Well clearly, yeah. On Wed, Feb 28, 2018 at 9:54 AM, Kerim Aydin wrote: > > > > On Wed, 28 Feb 2018, Ned Strange wrote: >> That's no longer the email I use for this game. Obviously not a COE >> because no ratification or anything. > > Got it. Assuming you're using

DIS: Re: BUS: punishment reform

Comments inline > On Feb 27, 2018, at 2:52 PM, Kerim Aydin wrote: > > > > > proto-proposal, the Lesson of the Weevils > > > > Create the following Rule, Weevils, power-2: > > Weevils are

Re: DIS: Unofficial economic FAQ

Thanks for this, it's been a while since I read the PAoaM proposal and I forgot a lot of stuff. On 2/27/2018 12:26 AM, Edward Murphy wrote: Agora economic FAQ (updated 2018-02-26) This is an informal summary of the board-game-esque areas of gameplay (as opposed to proposals/offices/CFJs), and

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: punishment reform

On Tue, 27 Feb 2018, Gaelan Steele wrote: > Comments inline Comments on comments inline... > > The voting strength of a player on an Agoran Decision is reduced > > by 1 for every 3 weevils in eir possession. > > Voting strength is an integer, right? I kind of like the idea of this

Re: DIS: Fwd: About that secret project...

Can I just say that I still really like the idea of this proposal? I don't really want to attempt judicial reform, however, since I just got done with a different game(chang|break)ing proposal. El 27 feb. 2018 17:10, "Aris Merchant" escribió: > Forwarding a

DIS: Online Treasuror's Report

The Treasuror’s report is now online at https://agoranomic.org/Treasuror. In addition, if anyone wants it for automation, there is both a log.yaml (event log) and current.yaml (current state, generated from log) file in the GitHub repository. Gaelan