DIS: Re: BUS: Karma time

2019-02-01 Thread Reuben Staley
This is not a Notice of Honour BUT IF IT WERE: +1 Cuddlebeam for coming up with inventive ways to use contracts -1 Telnaior for being a poor sport On 2/1/19 11:28 PM, Telnaior wrote: This is a Notice of Honour. Agora gains 1 karma for being "positively ancient". Cuddle Beam loses 1 karma for

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: humble agoran farmer becomes an automated victory dispensing machine

2019-02-01 Thread Cuddle Beam
Fuck lmao. There goes that idea. Thanks for pointing it out. On Fri, Feb 1, 2019 at 10:56 PM Ørjan Johansen wrote: > On Fri, 1 Feb 2019, Cuddle Beam wrote: > > > Note that I can have others send the attack Energy message on my behalf, > > and it's not obligatory for the sender of the attack

DIS: Re: BUS: humble agoran farmer becomes an automated victory dispensing machine

2019-02-01 Thread Cuddle Beam
I just realized that I forgot to include the money-input part lol. Oh well, just tip me or something. On Fri, Feb 1, 2019 at 10:51 PM Cuddle Beam wrote: > WOO! Ever wanted to win Agora? Well now you can, for just 10 coins! Woohoo! > *Vuvuzela sounds* > > Note that I can have others send the

DIS: Re: BUS: humble agoran farmer becomes an automated victory dispensing machine

2019-02-01 Thread Ørjan Johansen
On Fri, 1 Feb 2019, Cuddle Beam wrote: Note that I can have others send the attack Energy message on my behalf, and it's not obligatory for the sender of the attack Energy to _understand their own message_. [...]; in particular, a person CANNOT act on behalf of another person to

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Vigilante time

2019-02-01 Thread Kerim Aydin
Since I brought up the other communications-related CFJs today, a note/ gratuitous argument on this one: If the rules are "a person CAN do X by announcement" the "action by announcement" standard is entirely in R478: a person performs that action by unambiguously and

Re: DIS: treating wins via cheating?

2019-02-01 Thread Kerim Aydin
On 2/1/2019 8:03 AM, ais...@alumni.bham.ac.uk wrote: On Fri, 2019-02-01 at 07:59 -0800, Kerim Aydin wrote: Example: While a player is the only active first-class player not to satisfy at least one Losing Condition, e satisfies the Winning Condition of Solitude.

Re: DIS: treating wins via cheating?

2019-02-01 Thread ais...@alumni.bham.ac.uk
On Fri, 2019-02-01 at 07:59 -0800, Kerim Aydin wrote: > Example: >While a player is the only active first-class player not to >satisfy at least one Losing Condition, e satisfies the Winning >Condition of Solitude. > >Cleanup procedure: The same person cannot

Re: DIS: treating wins via cheating?

2019-02-01 Thread Kerim Aydin
On 1/31/2019 10:31 AM, Aris Merchant wrote: I'd like to work on this. With regard to looping wins, I think we should give some people some sort of additional prize, probably in the form of a patent title, for proving that they *could* win an infinite (or finite but very large) number of times.