I remain interested in judging cases
> On Aug 1, 2019, at 1:37 PM, Aris Merchant
> wrote:
>
>> On Thu, Aug 1, 2019 at 7:56 AM Kerim Aydin wrote:
>>
>>
>> Please reply to this thread to indicate interest in judging.
>>
>> We've had people favor cases lately that are technically
On Thu, Aug 1, 2019 at 10:38 AM Aris Merchant
wrote:
> H. Arbitor, I only sporadically have the time to judge cases, given the
> fluctuation in my other workload (both IRL and Agoran). When I do, I think
> my opinions are generally pretty decent. Do you mean you will no longer
> accept my
I think it is logical to give this responsibility to the Rulekeepor, and
I would take it up. A couple years ago when I was running for Rulekeepor
I had a similar idea, but eventually gave up on it because I figured it
was quite unimportant.
As of writing this, I express complete nonchalance
> On Aug 1, 2019, at 10:52 AM, Kerim Aydin wrote:
>
> D. Margaux (semi-timely, noted e was being busy, but still on list - weekend)
I've only had one CFJ in recent weeks and I believe I judged it in a timely
fashion, didn't i? Or were there CFJs that I missed?
Admittedly it's been hard for
On Thu, 1 Aug 2019 at 23:00, Aris Merchant
wrote:
>
> On Thu, Aug 1, 2019 at 3:44 PM Jason Cobb wrote:
>
> > On 7/30/19 9:51 PM, James Cook wrote:
> > > On Tue, 30 Jul 2019 at 02:31, Edward Murphy wrote:
> > >> I vote as follows. Also, not sure what the difficulties were here, but
> > >> in any
On 8/1/19 8:53 PM, James Cook wrote:
Would it make the Promotor's job easier if the Rules were changed to
not require distributing everything at once?
In my understanding, the Rules don't require this now.
Rule 1607 reads, in part:
In a given Agoran week, the Promotor SHALL, as part of eir
On Thu, Aug 1, 2019 at 3:44 PM Jason Cobb wrote:
> On 7/30/19 9:51 PM, James Cook wrote:
> > On Tue, 30 Jul 2019 at 02:31, Edward Murphy wrote:
> >> I vote as follows. Also, not sure what the difficulties were here, but
> >> in any case, how would people feel about multiple distributions per
On 7/30/19 9:51 PM, James Cook wrote:
On Tue, 30 Jul 2019 at 02:31, Edward Murphy wrote:
I vote as follows. Also, not sure what the difficulties were here, but
in any case, how would people feel about multiple distributions per week
(5 to 10 per day, say)? (No, I'm not bidding for the office
On 8/1/2019 6:02 PM, Jason Cobb wrote:
> On 8/1/19 8:53 PM, James Cook wrote:
>> Would it make the Promotor's job easier if the Rules were changed to
>> not require distributing everything at once?
>
>
> In my understanding, the Rules don't require this now.
>
> Rule 1607 reads, in part:
>
>>
On 8/1/2019 6:26 PM, D. Margaux wrote:
>> On Aug 1, 2019, at 10:52 AM, Kerim Aydin wrote:
>>
>> D. Margaux (semi-timely, noted e was being busy, but still on list -
> weekend)
>
> I've only had one CFJ in recent weeks and I believe I judged it in a
> timely fashion, didn't i? Or were there
On Wed, 2019-07-31 at 20:07 -0400, D. Margaux wrote:
> Ok--how about this:
>
> ///
> {
> Adopt a proposal with AI and other characteristics minimally
> sufficient to give full effect to its terms, providing as follows:
>
> { The gamestate and ruleset are changed to what they were on 31
>
On Thu, 1 Aug 2019 at 00:06, Kerim Aydin wrote:
> New month, so:
>
> I award a Gray Ribbon to Falsifian (doesn't fully make up for a precious
> indigo but it's something at least!)
Thanks for the ribbon! I guess I got sloppy with ribbons after I got
my Transparent one. I certainly don't expect
On Thu, 1 Aug 2019 at 01:24, Kerim Aydin wrote:
> I submit the following proposal "Era of the Salted Earth", AI=1.5:
>
>
> Amend Rule 2415 (Badges) by appending the following paragraph:
>
>The current Era of Agora is
On 7/31/19 4:42 PM, D. Margaux wrote:
I CFJ this statement: Agora is ossified.
I CFJ this statement: Rule 1698 (Ossification) is in effect.
I favour these CFJs.
I know I've already given gratuitous arguments, but since those ended up
being similar to ais523/Aris's arguments, I don't think
On 8/1/2019 8:12 AM, Jason Cobb wrote:
On 8/1/19 10:54 AM, James Cook wrote:
R991 still says "The Arbitor SHALL assign judges over time such that
all interested players have reasonably equal opportunities to judge.".
I'm not sure what an "eligible judge" is, but it might just be any
Player
On Thu, 1 Aug 2019 at 15:46, James Cook wrote:
>
> No zombie auction is necessary right now under R1885. This
> announcement is required by that rule.
>
> --
> - Falsifian
I expect we'll have many eligible zombies by the start of September.
Let me know if you'd like me to start one before then
On 8/1/2019 8:59 AM, James Cook wrote:
> Note: The previous monthly report incorrectly listed the deregistration
> dates of 天火狐 and pokes as January 2019. The correct month is February
> 2019, as listed in this report.
Can you list Tenhigitsune as an alternative (transliteration) for 天火狐?
-G.
On Thu, 1 Aug 2019 at 14:25, Jason Cobb wrote:
> Title: Moot cleanup
>
> AI: 1.7
>
> Text:
>
> {
>
> [Comment: this appears to be left over from when favouring cases was
> given Rules-defined meaning.]
>
> Amend Rule 911 ("Motions and Moots") by replacing the text "unless no
> other eligible
On 8/1/19 10:54 AM, James Cook wrote:
R991 still says "The Arbitor SHALL assign judges over time such that
all interested players have reasonably equal opportunities to judge.".
I'm not sure what an "eligible judge" is, but it might just be any
Player who the CFJ can be assigned to, i.e. anyone
On 8/1/2019 8:48 AM, James Cook wrote:
On Thu, 1 Aug 2019 at 15:46, James Cook wrote:
No zombie auction is necessary right now under R1885. This
announcement is required by that rule.
Crud - I'd meant to return my zombie yesterday to trigger an auction and
completely forgot (though no
On Thu, Aug 1, 2019 at 7:56 AM Kerim Aydin wrote:
>
> Please reply to this thread to indicate interest in judging.
>
> We've had people favor cases lately that are technically "uninterested" by
> my tracking, and also people technically "interested" dropping cases. So
> time for a refresh.
>
>
21 matches
Mail list logo
