On Saturday, October 26, 2019 3:19 PM, Timon Walshe-Grey wrote:
> I would be happy to take it on if I can get Trigon's code working.
which reminds me, can someone add me to the GitHub org? My username is @qenya.
-twg
‐‐‐ Original Message ‐‐‐
On Saturday, October 26, 2019 10:10 AM, Kerim Aydin wrote:
>
>
> On 10/26/2019 7:46 AM, Kerim Aydin wrote:
>
> > 00 nch
>
> > -1 Hālian
>
> So, we recently made the quarterly karma balancing automatic instead of
> manual (last paragraph of R2510).
>
> Then,
To be honest, I’m not sure I see the point. In my experience interim incumbents
nearly always win elections, and most modern Agoran offices have very little
power anyway. All I really see this doing is punishing those who take up work
that’s not being done.
Gaelan
> On Oct 26, 2019, at 5:43
‐‐‐ Original Message ‐‐‐
On Saturday, October 26, 2019 10:19 AM, Timon Walshe-Grey
wrote:
> On Saturday, October 26, 2019 1:39 PM, Kerim Aydin ke...@uw.edu wrote:
>
> > [of course what we really need is a rulekeepor :) ]
>
> I would be happy to take it on if I can get Trigon's code
On 10/26/2019 8:20 AM, Nch wrote:
‐‐‐ Original Message ‐‐‐
On Saturday, October 26, 2019 10:10 AM, Kerim Aydin wrote:
On 10/26/2019 7:46 AM, Kerim Aydin wrote:
00 nch
-1 Hālian
So, we recently made the quarterly karma balancing automatic instead of
manual (last
On Sat, 2019-10-26 at 16:23 +, ais...@alumni.bham.ac.uk wrote:
> It's not just you who isn't receiving it. I'm not receiving Nch's
> mail either.
>
> Nch, could you send an email directly to my mailserver at
> ? That might help to debug whatever issues
> are going wrong with the mail
I seem to recall that manually typing “BUS:” before message subjects prevents
the mailing list from changing messages at all, solving some of these issues.
Gaelan
> On Oct 26, 2019, at 9:55 AM, "ais...@alumni.bham.ac.uk"
> wrote:
>
> On Sat, 2019-10-26 at 16:23 +,
On 10/26/2019 7:46 AM, Kerim Aydin wrote:
00 nch
> -1 Hālian
So, we recently made the quarterly karma balancing automatic instead of
manual (last paragraph of R2510).
Then, when I did the Oct 6 report, I forgot about it. That has since
ratified.
So nch and Hālian both had their
‐‐‐ Original Message ‐‐‐
On Saturday, October 26, 2019 10:22 AM, Gaelan Steele wrote:
> To be honest, I’m not sure I see the point. In my experience interim
> incumbents nearly always win elections, and most modern Agoran offices have
> very little power anyway. All I really see this
I could set up a mail rule to forward you everything from *@protonmail.com to
the Agora lists. Depending on how that forwarding works, it might get past the
filter.
Gaelan
> On Oct 26, 2019, at 8:36 AM, Timon Walshe-Grey wrote:
>
> On Saturday, October 26, 2019 3:22 PM, Nch wrote:
>> I'm
On Sat, 2019-10-26 at 15:36 +, Timon Walshe-Grey wrote:
> On Saturday, October 26, 2019 3:22 PM, Nch
> wrote:
> > I'm ccing you here, so let me know if you get this one. I suspect
> > your spam filter doesn't like *@protonmail and you need to add an
> > exception. (Someone might want to quote
On 10/26/2019 9:33 AM, James Cook wrote:
> The first two simply use the word "all". Since the natural definition
> of "ruleset" is the set of Agora's rules, meaning all of them, I find
> that R1051's text "The Rulekeepor's Weekly report includes the Short
> Logical Ruleset." is just as
On Saturday, October 26, 2019 1:39 PM, Kerim Aydin wrote:
> [of course what we really need is a rulekeepor :) ]
I would be happy to take it on if I can get Trigon's code working. Referee has
been a bit dull recently because everyone is being boring and obeying the rules.
(also, ftr, I'm still
I am also considering taking up the role, but I’m happy to leave it to you. Or
we could set up some sort of contract (grumbles about having to study up on
Agoran contract law these days) to share the workload?
Gaelan
> On Oct 26, 2019, at 8:19 AM, Timon Walshe-Grey wrote:
>
> On Saturday,
‐‐‐ Original Message ‐‐‐
On Saturday, October 26, 2019 10:25 AM, Gaelan Steele wrote:
> Or we could set up some sort of contract (grumbles about having to study up
> on Agoran contract law these days) to share the workload?
I really need to (find,) finish and submit my Agoran
On 10/26/2019 8:28 AM, Nch wrote:
‐‐‐ Original Message ‐‐‐
On Saturday, October 26, 2019 10:22 AM, Gaelan Steele wrote:
To be honest, I’m not sure I see the point. In my experience interim incumbents
nearly always win elections, and most modern Agoran offices have very little
On Saturday, October 26, 2019 3:22 PM, Nch wrote:
> I'm ccing you here, so let me know if you get this one. I suspect your spam
> filter doesn't like *@protonmail and you need to add an exception. (Someone
> might want to quote this back on AD for em in case it doesn't make it
> through.)
On Sun, 20 Oct 2019 at 07:38, Kerim Aydin wrote:
> I recuse Trigon from CFJ 3775. I assign CFJ 3775 to Falsifian.
>
> status: https://faculty.washington.edu/kerim/nomic/cases/#3775
>
> === CFJ 3775 ===
>
>Ratifying the SLR also
On Sat, 26 Oct 2019 at 16:53, Kerim Aydin wrote:
> On 10/26/2019 9:33 AM, James Cook wrote:
> > The first two simply use the word "all". Since the natural definition
> > of "ruleset" is the set of Agora's rules, meaning all of them, I find
> > that R1051's text "The Rulekeepor's Weekly report
On 10/26/2019 10:03 AM, James Cook wrote:
I think it would be good to have a separate CFJ, even if it ends up
mostly referencing mine. My quotes of R1607 and R2166 have the world
"all" in them, and I argued that "all" is part of the meaning of
"ruleset" too. Since this is "Patent Titles",
Let me know if this gets through.
---
Nch
nch wrote:
> ...and reduce consolidation.
As we are picking up again, I'd be more than happy for someone
else to be Tailor.
Same for Herald, tho I'd like to clear up the current report
ratification first, and and I'd ask that any takers be *really*
keen on promoting herald stuff (through
‐‐‐ Original Message ‐‐‐
On Saturday, October 26, 2019 8:39 AM, Kerim Aydin wrote:
>
>
> nch wrote:
>
> > ...and reduce consolidation.
>
> As we are picking up again, I'd be more than happy for someone
> else to be Tailor.
>
> Same for Herald, tho I'd like to clear up the current report
On Fri, 27 Sep 2019 at 12:04, Timon Walshe-Grey wrote:
> on my phone so can't provide detailed arguments (and sorry for the execrable
> mess it will undoubtedly produce of the reply chain), but I would argue that
> the entity defining switches, assets etc. is not any one rule, but rather the
>
This was sent using a method ais523 concocted. Let's see if it goes through.
Here's another draft. Again, my apologies for the delay. Any further
proposals will not be included in this week's report. Additionally,
remember my note that P8265 is deliberately hard to find in the full
list, but is in there.
-Aris
--
I hereby distribute each listed proposal, initiating the
On 10/26/19 7:36 PM, Aris Merchant wrote:
ID: 8259
Title: Clean up your own mess, without making a bigger one
Adoption index: 1.0
Author: Jason Cobb
Co-authors:
This is Gaelan's proposal, but I am a coauthor.
--
Jason Cobb
On Sat, 26 Oct 2019 at 15:23, Gaelan Steele wrote:
> To be honest, I’m not sure I see the point. In my experience interim
> incumbents nearly always win elections, and most modern Agoran offices have
> very little power anyway. All I really see this doing is punishing those who
> take up work
On Sat, 26 Oct 2019 at 16:55, ais...@alumni.bham.ac.uk
wrote:
> On Sat, 2019-10-26 at 16:23 +, ais...@alumni.bham.ac.uk wrote:
> > It's not just you who isn't receiving it. I'm not receiving Nch's
> > mail either.
> >
> > Nch, could you send an email directly to my mailserver at
> > ? That
On Saturday, October 26, 2019 11:36 PM, Aris Merchant
wrote:
> 8654 nch 1.0 [2]
I think you typoed the ID here - the full list gives it as 8264.
> 8265 twg, Murphy, Aris3.0 [3]
Jason Cobb is a co-author to 8265 as well.
Also I find your obfuscation far
On Sat, 26 Oct 2019 at 15:21, Timon Walshe-Grey wrote:
> On Saturday, October 26, 2019 3:19 PM, Timon Walshe-Grey
> wrote:
> > I would be happy to take it on if I can get Trigon's code working.
>
> which reminds me, can someone add me to the GitHub org? My username is @qenya.
>
> -twg
For the
I’ve had a proposal for an alternative “duty” (name TBD) bouncing around for a
while. It goes something like this:
* Most offices (basically, all but the imposed ones and the ones that handle
secret information) get replaced with “duties.”
* Anyone can fulfill a duty (i.e. publish the report,
On 10/26/19 8:53 PM, Gaelan Steele wrote:
TL;DR: No “officeholders”; anyone can do a job if it hasn’t been done yet that
{week,month}. They get paid for doing so, and get paid more if they’ve been
doing it consistently or if it’s been overdue for a while.
This is an interesting idea - but I
‐‐‐ Original Message ‐‐‐
On Saturday, October 26, 2019 7:53 PM, Gaelan Steele wrote:
>
> TL;DR: No “officeholders”; anyone can do a job if it hasn’t been done yet
> that {week,month}. They get paid for doing so, and get paid more if they’ve
> been doing it consistently or if it’s
‐‐‐ Original Message ‐‐‐
On Saturday, October 26, 2019 7:31 PM, James Cook wrote:
> On Sat, 26 Oct 2019 at 15:23, Gaelan Steele g...@canishe.com wrote:
>
> > To be honest, I’m not sure I see the point. In my experience interim
> > incumbents nearly always win elections, and most modern
This has been proposed before, IIRC, and consensus is against it for
two reasons (it’s possible I’m misremembering here, but all the
concerns are valid regardless). Firstly, many official duties are
essential to the game, and having them assigned to the same person
promotes accountability, since
‐‐‐ Original Message ‐‐‐
On Saturday, October 26, 2019 7:56 PM, James Cook wrote:
>
> Registrar's Monthly Report
>
>
That’s a very interesting point, and one that I hadn’t considered. One
possibility would be to have a few days at the beginning of each week in which
only the person with the top reward (i.e. the “main” officeholder). This would
help in the most common cases, but maybe would still discourage
On Sun, 27 Oct 2019 at 01:42, Nch wrote:
>
> ‐‐‐ Original Message ‐‐‐
> On Saturday, October 26, 2019 7:56 PM, James Cook
> wrote:
>
> >
> > Registrar's Monthly Report
> >
> >
39 matches
Mail list logo
