On Mon, Jan 27, 2020 at 10:12 PM Gaelan Steele via agora-discussion
wrote:
> Speaking of which, last I checked, the link (at the top of the mailman
> archive) to download the full archive is broken.
Fixed. Seems like a Mailman bug introduced in this commit [1], which
nobody has noticed in over
On Thu, 23 Jan 2020 at 21:54, Aris Merchant via agora-discussion
wrote:
> However, it can be blocked by only three objections, and the
> rule refuses to apply any abusive change, which on its own prevents it
> from being used as part of a scam.
Isn't it a memorandum's decision what it finds in
On Tue, Jan 28, 2020 at 12:47 PM Jason Cobb via agora-discussion
wrote:
>
> On 1/28/20 2:14 PM, Aris Merchant via agora-discussion wrote:
> > On Tue, Jan 28, 2020 at 12:03 AM omd via agora-discussion
> > wrote:
> >
> >> I suppose I could mirror the archives on GitHub, which would be less
> >>
Come back soon!
On Sat, 25 Jan 2020 at 13:31, Rebecca via agora-business
wrote:
>
> I deregister
>
> On Sat, Jan 25, 2020 at 8:12 PM Timon Walshe-Grey via agora-discussion <
> agora-discussion@agoranomic.org> wrote:
>
> > Aris wrote:
> > > On Fri, Jan 24, 2020 at 3:25 PM Rebecca via
On Tue, Jan 28, 2020 at 7:29 AM Matthew Berlin via agora-discussion
wrote:
> A custom Agora blockchain for the ruleset and BUS actions? I'd
> certainly be up for running a node...and could help with dev,
I mean, Git is a blockchain. :)
On Tue, 28 Jan 2020 at 21:53, James Cook wrote:
> On Thu, 23 Jan 2020 at 21:54, Aris Merchant via agora-discussion
> wrote:
> > However, it can be blocked by only three objections, and the
> > rule refuses to apply any abusive change, which on its own prevents it
> > from being used as part of a
On Fri, 24 Jan 2020 at 22:04, Kerim Aydin via agora-discussion
wrote:
> Over time I've managed to backfill in about half the cases in the
> 3400s, but took time off in the 3500-3600s, so there's still gaps
> there. Getting 10-20 old cases up per month or so, generally working
> backwards.
When
On Tue, 28 Jan 2020 at 17:48, omd via agora-discussion <
agora-discussion@agoranomic.org> wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 28, 2020 at 7:29 AM Matthew Berlin via agora-discussion
> wrote:
> > A custom Agora blockchain for the ruleset and BUS actions? I'd
> > certainly be up for running a node...and could
On Tue, Jan 28, 2020 at 12:47 PM Jason Cobb via agora-discussion
wrote:
> Couldn't someone just zip the files and put them in a public GitHub
> repo? If we really cared, the zip files could be encrypted and the
> password could be put in the README, since I think most of the major
> operating
Matthew Berlin wrote:
> A custom Agora blockchain for the ruleset and BUS actions?
It seems to me that an equally efficient, and somewhat lower-tech,
solution would be for several different people to keep copies of the
archives using the link omd provided upthread.
Of course this doesn't protect
On Mon, 27 Jan 2020 21:59:44 -0800
Aris Merchant via agora-discussion
wrote:
> To the best of my knowledge, we have no contingency plans for
> preserving Agoran history in such an eventuality. Our Distributor is
> amazing, but sooner or later e will die, and that death may come
> before e has
On Tue, Jan 28, 2020 at 8:24 AM Alexis Hunt via agora-official
wrote:
> NOW KNOW YOU that we, by the Powers granted to us under Winning the
> Game, being the two thousand and forty-fourth Rule of Agora, do hereby
> bestow upon G. the Patent Title of Champion; and
Thanks! I'm curious what you
G. wrote:
> CoE on coin balances: missing blackjack payments?
Oh yes. Somehow it didn't register with me that those were actual game
actions. :P
Revision forthcoming.
-twg
On Tue, 28 Jan 2020 at 12:12, Kerim Aydin via agora-discussion
wrote:
>
> On Tue, Jan 28, 2020 at 8:24 AM Alexis Hunt via agora-official
> wrote:
> > NOW KNOW YOU that we, by the Powers granted to us under Winning the
> > Game, being the two thousand and forty-fourth Rule of Agora, do hereby
> >
H. Distributor,
Is it intentional that the Reply-To headers for messages include the
original author? I always take them out.
Alexis
It is interesting to consider changing our use of pronouns, but if
we're not changing anything, is there any reason to cover pronouns in
the editorial guidelines at all? I don't see any confusion or
inconsistency related to them, and I expect any new player who has
given the rules even a cursory
Falsifian wrote:
> I was hesitent to raise this morbid concern, but now that the subject
> has been broached, are dead former players persons? R869 would seem to
> say no. This may affect the accuracy of Tailor reports.
https://www.mail-archive.com/agora-discussion@agoranomic.org/msg45140.html
On Tue, 28 Jan 2020 at 23:18, omd via agora-discussion
wrote:
> I can at least put it through the formal proposal process, by
> submitting a proposal expressing the sense of Agora that it's okay to
> publish players' email addresses on the web. However, that only
> accounts for current active
Archived at https://github.com/AgoraNomic/Reporter/tree/master/weekly_summaries
(Sorry for the repeat email; I forgot the subject line the frist time.)
For the week 2020-01-20..26:
# Victory
* G. wins the game by paying a fee of 1000 coins, and tells the story
of eir coins. Thread: "bored
On Tue, Jan 28, 2020 at 7:47 PM Jason Cobb via agora-business
wrote:
> I earn 5 coins for assessing a proposal.
You can't, because P8295 made it so the ADoP has to do this. (And is
also broken, so nobody can do it.)
omd wrote:
> However, I vaguely remember having proposed this in the past, and
> someone objecting to it. But I can't find the thread; searching for
> "scrapers", only this thread comes up. I could be misremembering.
Is this it?
On Tue, 28 Jan 2020 at 18:26, Timon Walshe-Grey via agora-discussion <
agora-discussion@agoranomic.org> wrote:
> omd wrote:
> > However, I vaguely remember having proposed this in the past, and
> > someone objecting to it. But I can't find the thread; searching for
> > "scrapers", only this
I wrote:
> Alexis wrote:
> > Is it intentional that the Reply-To headers for messages include the
> > original author? I always take them out.
>
> To my knowledge, this isn't a general list problem - it only happens to
> messages from me. Still unclear exactly why, although I blame my email
>
On Tue, 28 Jan 2020 at 15:46, Timon Walshe-Grey via agora-discussion
wrote:
> Also relevant: CFJs 3411-3412.
I was hesitent to raise this morbid concern, but now that the subject
has been broached, are dead former players persons? R869 would seem to
say no. This may affect the accuracy of Tailor
On Tue, 28 Jan 2020 at 23:54, Timon Walshe-Grey via agora-discussion
wrote:
> Falsifian wrote:
> > I was hesitent to raise this morbid concern, but now that the subject
> > has been broached, are dead former players persons? R869 would seem to
> > say no. This may affect the accuracy of Tailor
On Tue, 28 Jan 2020 at 18:47, Timon Walshe-Grey via agora-discussion <
agora-discussion@agoranomic.org> wrote:
> I wrote:
> > Alexis wrote:
> > > Is it intentional that the Reply-To headers for messages include the
> > > original author? I always take them out.
> >
> > To my knowledge, this isn't
Archived at https://github.com/AgoraNomic/Reporter/tree/master/weekly_summaries
For the week 2020-01-20..26:
# Victory
* G. wins the game by paying a fee of 1000 coins, and tells the story
of eir coins. Thread: "bored of liquidity, need to invest"
# Voting
* The H. Assessor resolves
On Tue, Jan 28, 2020 at 3:26 PM Timon Walshe-Grey wrote:
>
> omd wrote:
> > However, I vaguely remember having proposed this in the past, and
> > someone objecting to it. But I can't find the thread; searching for
> > "scrapers", only this thread comes up. I could be misremembering.
>
> Is this
On Tue, Jan 28, 2020 at 4:07 PM Alexis Hunt via agora-discussion
wrote:
> The list is what sends out the final messages, not your provider.
The list is currently configured to append the list address to
Reply-To rather than overwriting it; I could change this. Looking at
the archives, it seems
On 1/28/20 11:12 PM, omd via agora-discussion wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 28, 2020 at 7:47 PM Jason Cobb via agora-business
> wrote:
>> I earn 5 coins for assessing a proposal.
> You can't, because P8295 made it so the ADoP has to do this. (And is
> also broken, so nobody can do it.)
Well, dammit.
Alexis wrote:
> Is it intentional that the Reply-To headers for messages include the
> original author? I always take them out.
To my knowledge, this isn't a general list problem - it only happens to
messages from me. Still unclear exactly why, although I blame my email
provider, which has
On Tue, Jan 28, 2020 at 3:50 PM James Cook wrote:
>
> On Tue, 28 Jan 2020 at 15:46, Timon Walshe-Grey via agora-discussion
> wrote:
> > Also relevant: CFJs 3411-3412.
>
> I was hesitent to raise this morbid concern, but now that the subject
> has been broached, are dead former players persons?
Rule 991 states:
> At any time, each CFJ is either open (default), suspended, or
> assigned exactly one judgement.
What exactly does it mean for a CFJ to be "assigned exactly one
judgement"? Specifically, does this include judgements that are not
listed as "valid judgements" by Rule
On Tue, Jan 28, 2020 at 9:26 AM Alexis Hunt via agora-discussion
wrote:
>
> On Tue, 28 Jan 2020 at 12:12, Kerim Aydin via agora-discussion
> wrote:
> >
> > On Tue, Jan 28, 2020 at 8:24 AM Alexis Hunt via agora-official
> > wrote:
> > > NOW KNOW YOU that we, by the Powers granted to us under
On Tue, 28 Jan 2020 at 15:47, Jason Cobb via agora-discussion
wrote:
>
> On 1/28/20 2:14 PM, Aris Merchant via agora-discussion wrote:
> > On Tue, Jan 28, 2020 at 12:03 AM omd via agora-discussion
> > wrote:
> >
> >> I suppose I could mirror the archives on GitHub, which would be less
> >>
On Tue, Jan 28, 2020 at 12:03 AM omd via agora-discussion
wrote:
> I suppose I could mirror the archives on GitHub, which would be less
> idiosyncratic and more resilient to me getting hit by a bus. That
> would, however, imply giving up on obfuscating email addresses, unless
> I made the repo
On 1/28/20 2:14 PM, Aris Merchant via agora-discussion wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 28, 2020 at 12:03 AM omd via agora-discussion
> wrote:
>
>> I suppose I could mirror the archives on GitHub, which would be less
>> idiosyncratic and more resilient to me getting hit by a bus. That
>> would, however,
On 1/28/2020 8:16 PM, Jason Cobb via agora-discussion wrote:
> On 1/28/20 11:12 PM, omd via agora-discussion wrote:
>> On Tue, Jan 28, 2020 at 7:47 PM Jason Cobb via agora-business
>> wrote:
>>> I earn 5 coins for assessing a proposal.
>> You can't, because P8295 made it so the ADoP has to do
38 matches
Mail list logo
