On 6/25/20 11:39 AM, Publius Scribonius Scholasticus via
agora-discussion wrote:
> For simplicity, would it be possible for the Registrar to adopt
> regulations defering to the Treasuror's regulations?
I think so. I don't see any reason a Regulation couldn't simply say
"Auctions are run as
On 6/25/20 6:40 PM, Jason Cobb via agora-discussion wrote:
> Title: Regulatory Instruments v2
> Author: Jason
> Coauthors: Aris
> Adoption index: 3.0
Reading this it seems mechanically sound. However I kind of agree with
G. Were there any specific deficits with the current regulation system
On Fri, Jun 26, 2020 at 2:32 PM Kerim Aydin via agora-discussion
wrote:
> Can someone point me to the CFJ that says "authorized to" conditions are
> triggered by a CAN, but not a SHALL? (specifically that look at the term
> "authorize", I'm just curious how much that highly-used but undefined in
On 6/27/20 12:14 AM, Aris Merchant via agora-discussion wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 26, 2020 at 9:13 PM Jason Cobb via agora-discussion <
> agora-discussion@agoranomic.org> wrote:
>
>> On 6/27/20 12:11 AM, nch via agora-discussion wrote:
>>> Regardless of the interpretation of this clause, "pending" a
On 6/26/20 7:45 PM, James Cook via agora-business wrote:
>> oh, duh. everyone's been going back and forth so much with ideas and
>> drafts I wasn't thinking of ownership at all. go for it!
> I submit a proposal as follows. (But I do not pend it just yet.)
>
> Title: Contract charities
>
On Fri, Jun 26, 2020 at 9:13 PM Jason Cobb via agora-discussion <
agora-discussion@agoranomic.org> wrote:
> On 6/27/20 12:11 AM, nch via agora-discussion wrote:
> > Regardless of the interpretation of this clause, "pending" a proposal is
> > flipping its switch. You can't flip a switch to the
On 6/27/20 12:11 AM, nch via agora-discussion wrote:
> Regardless of the interpretation of this clause, "pending" a proposal is
> flipping its switch. You can't flip a switch to the same value it
> already has, per R2162.
Right, I'm not arguing that the flipping of the switch failed. I'm
On 6/26/20 7:50 PM, Jason Cobb via agora-discussion wrote:
> On 6/26/20 8:38 PM, Publius Scribonius Scholasticus via agora-business
> wrote:
>> Here is the list of proposals that I believe were pended in this way —
>> some may be missing, and I considered the possibility that the finger
>>
On Fri, Jun 26, 2020 at 6:12 PM James Cook via agora-discussion
wrote:
> I've thought it would be interesting to play a Nomic that starts with
> just one simple rule with text like "This is a Nomic; figure the rest
> out.". Or just on rules written down explicitly.
Back in 2008, there was a
On Wed, Jun 24, 2020 at 5:52 AM Jason Cobb via agora-discussion
wrote:
> Explanation for those curious:
>
> The attachment was the EICAR antivirus test file, which everything is
> supposed to treat as malware, but is really just a 68-byte text file.
> Gmail wouldn't even send it from my own
On 6/26/20 10:52 PM, Jason Cobb via agora-discussion wrote:
> On 6/26/20 11:42 PM, Ed Strange via agora-business wrote:
>> I pledge to abandin any attrmpt to do this scam if you give ME a win via
>> free tournament
>
> Interesting idea, but I think we'll have to wait to find out how the CFJ
> is
On 6/26/20 11:42 PM, Ed Strange via agora-business wrote:
> I pledge to abandin any attrmpt to do this scam if you give ME a win via
> free tournament
Interesting idea, but I think we'll have to wait to find out how the CFJ
is judged. Also, nch might be able to force you into doing it by
On Fri, Jun 26, 2020 at 5:39 PM Publius Scribonius Scholasticus via
agora-business wrote:
> Here is the list of proposals that I believe were pended in this way —
I think my proposal "Reset deadlines when resetting the economy" was
also pended.
On 6/26/20 9:18 PM, Jason Cobb wrote:
>
> I may have forgotten this case existed.
>
> Rule 2221 reads, in its entirety:
>
>> Rule 2221/7 (Power=3)
>> Cleanliness
>>
>> Any player CAN clean a rule without objection by specifying one or
>> more corrections to spelling, grammar,
On 6/26/2020 6:14 PM, Publius Scribonius Scholasticus wrote:
> On 6/26/20 9:11 PM, James Cook via agora-discussion wrote:
>> On Fri, 26 Jun 2020 at 16:08, Kerim Aydin via agora-discussion
>> wrote:
>>> On 6/26/2020 8:49 AM, Publius Scribonius Scholasticus wrote:
On 6/19/20 8:26 PM, Kerim
On 6/26/20 12:04 PM, Kerim Aydin via agora-discussion wrote:
> On 6/26/2020 8:49 AM, Publius Scribonius Scholasticus wrote:
>> On 6/19/20 8:26 PM, Kerim Aydin via agora-official wrote:
>>> The below CFJ is 3851. I assign it to Publius Scribonius Scholasticus.
>>>
>>> status:
On 6/26/20 9:11 PM, James Cook via agora-discussion wrote:
> On Fri, 26 Jun 2020 at 16:08, Kerim Aydin via agora-discussion
> wrote:
>> On 6/26/2020 8:49 AM, Publius Scribonius Scholasticus wrote:
>>> On 6/19/20 8:26 PM, Kerim Aydin via agora-official wrote:
The below CFJ is 3851. I assign
On Fri, Jun 26, 2020 at 6:12 PM James Cook via agora-discussion <
agora-discussion@agoranomic.org> wrote:
> On Fri, 26 Jun 2020 at 16:08, Kerim Aydin via agora-discussion
> wrote:
> > On 6/26/2020 8:49 AM, Publius Scribonius Scholasticus wrote:
> > > On 6/19/20 8:26 PM, Kerim Aydin via
On Fri, 26 Jun 2020 at 16:08, Kerim Aydin via agora-discussion
wrote:
> On 6/26/2020 8:49 AM, Publius Scribonius Scholasticus wrote:
> > On 6/19/20 8:26 PM, Kerim Aydin via agora-official wrote:
> >> The below CFJ is 3851. I assign it to Publius Scribonius Scholasticus.
> >>
> >> status:
On Thu, 25 Jun 2020 at 21:35, Aris Merchant via agora-business
wrote:
> I don't think I ever consented to the latest amendment, so I believe I
> am no longer a party. I become a party to the Dragon Corporation.
>
> -Aris
Oops, welcome back! Sorry, probably should have bumped that thread first.
On 6/26/20 8:50 PM, Jason Cobb via agora-discussion wrote:
> On 6/26/20 8:38 PM, Publius Scribonius Scholasticus via agora-business
> wrote:
>> Here is the list of proposals that I believe were pended in this way —
>> some may be missing, and I considered the possibility that the finger
>>
On 6/26/20 8:45 PM, James Cook via agora-business wrote:
> This SHOULD only be done if the
> contract's provisions ensure that its funds will be used solely
> for the betterment of Agora.
I think we should change this to:
This SHOULD only be done if the contract's
On Thu, 25 Jun 2020 at 19:39, Aris Merchant via agora-discussion
wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 25, 2020 at 12:36 PM nch via agora-discussion <
> agora-discussion@agoranomic.org> wrote:
> > On 6/25/20 2:35 PM, Aris Merchant wrote:
> > >
> > >
> > > On Thu, Jun 25, 2020 at 12:16 PM nch via agora-discussion
On 6/26/20 8:50 PM, Jason Cobb via agora-discussion wrote:
> On 6/26/20 8:38 PM, Publius Scribonius Scholasticus via agora-business
> wrote:
>> Here is the list of proposals that I believe were pended in this way —
>> some may be missing, and I considered the possibility that the finger
>>
On 6/26/20 8:38 PM, Publius Scribonius Scholasticus via agora-business
wrote:
> Here is the list of proposals that I believe were pended in this way —
> some may be missing, and I considered the possibility that the finger
> pointing was insufficiently precise, but given that I can recommend
>
On 6/26/2020 8:59 AM, Publius Scribonius Scholasticus via agora-business
wrote:
>
> G., you will need to initiate the decisions, but you can't yet, so hold
> on until the Fixes pass.
>
Can someone point me to the CFJ that says "authorized to" conditions are
triggered by a CAN, but not a SHALL?
On 6/26/20 12:37 PM, nch via agora-discussion wrote:
> On 6/26/20 11:10 AM, Jason Cobb via agora-business wrote:
>> I plead guilty, but I really do think that 4 blots is too high a penalty
>> for what I did. I wrote a patch for a bug that was possibly exploitable
>> in the future, but I certified
On 6/26/2020 8:59 AM, Publius Scribonius Scholasticus wrote:
> G., you will need to initiate the decisions, but you can't yet, so hold
> on until the Fixes pass.
>
Yah knowing this was coming up is one reason I grabbed the green ribbon
when I did :)
On 6/26/20 11:10 AM, Jason Cobb via agora-business wrote:
> I plead guilty, but I really do think that 4 blots is too high a penalty
> for what I did. I wrote a patch for a bug that was possibly exploitable
> in the future, but I certified it under what I think was a plausible
> reading of the
On 6/26/2020 8:49 AM, Publius Scribonius Scholasticus wrote:
> On 6/19/20 8:26 PM, Kerim Aydin via agora-official wrote:
>> The below CFJ is 3851. I assign it to Publius Scribonius Scholasticus.
>>
>> status: https://faculty.washington.edu/kerim/nomic/cases/#3851
>>
>>
On 6/26/20 11:34 AM, Kerim Aydin via agora-discussion wrote:
> On 6/25/2020 4:54 PM, Jason Cobb via agora-discussion wrote:
>> On 6/25/20 7:48 PM, Kerim Aydin via agora-discussion wrote:
>>> On 6/25/2020 4:40 PM, Jason Cobb via agora-discussion wrote:
Auction regulations are regulations
On 6/25/2020 4:54 PM, Jason Cobb via agora-discussion wrote:
> On 6/25/20 7:48 PM, Kerim Aydin via agora-discussion wrote:
>> On 6/25/2020 4:40 PM, Jason Cobb via agora-discussion wrote:
>>> Auction regulations are regulations defined by this rule, all of which
>>> comprise a single body of law,
32 matches
Mail list logo
