On Tue, May 26, 2009 at 5:00 PM, Jonatan Kilhamn
jonatan.kilh...@gmail.com wrote:
-Tiger, who also did away with the Geo. Mean since e didn't know
what it meant.
It's just a fancy name for the square root of the product. The reason
for it is that the product has the annoying property of
2009/5/27 Geoffrey Spear geoffsp...@gmail.com:
On Tue, May 26, 2009 at 7:00 PM, Jonatan Kilhamn
jonatan.kilh...@gmail.com wrote:
Tue 12 May 17:59 Wooble Wins by High Score. All scores are reset.
The reset doesn't happen until a week after the win, to give a chance
to declare a skunk.
Oh. In
2009/5/27 Elliott Hird penguinoftheg...@googlemail.com:
2009/5/27 Jonatan Kilhamn jonatan.kilh...@gmail.com:
-Tiger, who also did away with the Geo. Mean since e didn't know
what it meant.
Oh please... http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Geometric_mean
Okay, sorry then. My defence would be that I
On Tue, May 26, 2009 at 9:41 PM, Ed Murphy emurph...@socal.rr.com wrote:
ehird wrote:
2009/5/27 Ed Murphy emurph...@socal.rr.com:
Would someone please explain Min. to Win? Â I'm sure I could work it
out, but I have enough other things on my plate as it is.
Minimum points to win?
PROTIP:
On Tue, 26 May 2009, comex wrote:
Proposal: 3 support is boring
A player CAN flip a specified proposal to Distributable by
spending 1 Note.
Observation: in the old days under this system, no one was willing
to pay for trivial bug fixes than benefited everyone (e.g. Disinterested
On Wed, 27 May 2009, comex wrote:
Proposal: 3 support is boring
Crossed in the mail (still wrong AI). Oh well I paid for the other
one ;). -G.
On Tue, 2009-05-26 at 17:28 -0700, Ed Murphy wrote:
Quazie wrote:
Also, what does the membership of bayes look like?
I think it's terminated due to insufficient membership for a
non-pledge.
The relevant text from Bayes:
{{{
8. Persons CANNOT become party to this contract by announcement.
On Wed, 2009-05-27 at 11:43 -0400, comex wrote:
On Tue, May 26, 2009 at 9:41 PM, Ed Murphy emurph...@socal.rr.com wrote:
ehird wrote:
2009/5/27 Ed Murphy emurph...@socal.rr.com:
Would someone please explain Min. to Win? Â I'm sure I could work it
out, but I have enough other things on
On Wed, May 27, 2009 at 2:44 PM, Alex Smith ais...@bham.ac.uk wrote:
On Tue, 2009-05-26 at 17:28 -0700, Ed Murphy wrote:
Quazie wrote:
Also, what does the membership of bayes look like?
I think it's terminated due to insufficient membership for a
non-pledge.
The relevant text from Bayes:
2009/5/27 Geoffrey Spear geoffsp...@gmail.com
On Wed, May 27, 2009 at 2:44 PM, Alex Smith ais...@bham.ac.uk wrote:
On Tue, 2009-05-26 at 17:28 -0700, Ed Murphy wrote:
Quazie wrote:
Also, what does the membership of bayes look like?
I think it's terminated due to insufficient
It's minimum to win, not most likely point gain before win..
Sent from my iPhone
On May 27, 2009, at 2:53 PM, Alex Smith ais...@bham.ac.uk wrote:
On Wed, 2009-05-27 at 11:43 -0400, comex wrote:
On Tue, May 26, 2009 at 9:41 PM, Ed Murphy emurph...@socal.rr.com
wrote:
ehird wrote:
Goethe wrote:
On Wed, 27 May 2009, Ed Murphy wrote:
I intend, without member objection, to amend FRContest by replacing
section 6 with this text:
I join this contest.
I'd object to any new rewards unless we add something to reward and/or
penalize non-performing judges (I don't think we
On Wed, May 27, 2009 at 17:06, Sean Hunt ride...@gmail.com wrote:
Roger Hicks wrote:
I spend A# D F thrice to increase comex's caste by 3.
My apologies for overlooking this to begin with.
BobTHJ
One of these fails due to comex's caste being Alpha by that point (the
Conductor may wish to
On Wed, 27 May 2009, Alex Smith wrote:
On Wed, 2009-05-27 at 15:10 -0700, Ed Murphy wrote:
Goethe wrote:
I'd object to any new rewards unless we add something to reward and/or
penalize non-performing judges (I don't think we have such a thing,
do we?). Something like the judge of a round
On Wed, May 27, 2009 at 8:58 PM, Aaron Goldfein aarongoldf...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, May 27, 2009 at 7:50 PM, Alex Smith ais...@bham.ac.uk wrote:
(and they were kind enough to announce it in a discussion forum...)
I intend, without objection, to flip the recognition of Fresh Nomic to
On Wed, 2009-05-27 at 21:03 -0400, comex wrote:
On Wed, May 27, 2009 at 8:58 PM, Aaron Goldfein aarongoldf...@gmail.com
wrote:
On Wed, May 27, 2009 at 7:50 PM, Alex Smith ais...@bham.ac.uk wrote:
(and they were kind enough to announce it in a discussion forum...)
I intend, without
On Wed, May 27, 2009 at 8:03 PM, comex com...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, May 27, 2009 at 8:58 PM, Aaron Goldfein aarongoldf...@gmail.com
wrote:
On Wed, May 27, 2009 at 7:50 PM, Alex Smith ais...@bham.ac.uk wrote:
(and they were kind enough to announce it in a discussion forum...)
I
On Wed, 2009-05-27 at 20:07 -0500, Aaron Goldfein wrote:
Because I'm about to have imperial-style control over the nomic. And
that post announcing Fresh's death was made just before I showed up.
Arguably, a full dictatorship by one person over a nomic is one way for
it to die, unless it's
On Wed, May 27, 2009 at 8:15 PM, Alex Smith ais...@bham.ac.uk wrote:
On Wed, 2009-05-27 at 20:07 -0500, Aaron Goldfein wrote:
Because I'm about to have imperial-style control over the nomic. And
that post announcing Fresh's death was made just before I showed up.
Arguably, a full
On Wed, May 27, 2009 at 8:15 PM, Alex Smith ais...@bham.ac.uk wrote:
On Wed, 2009-05-27 at 20:07 -0500, Aaron Goldfein wrote:
Because I'm about to have imperial-style control over the nomic. And
that post announcing Fresh's death was made just before I showed up.
Arguably, a full
On Wed, 2009-05-27 at 20:22 -0500, Aaron Goldfein wrote:
Fresh Nomic has a nomic ruleset as I can make any arbitrary change in
a finite time. Therefore, it is a nomic.
A nomic can be abandoned, and yet still a nomic. (One True Agora, for
instance, or Old Canada.)
--
ais523
On Wed, 27 May 2009, Aaron Goldfein wrote:
Because I'm about to have imperial-style control over the nomic. And that
post announcing Fresh's death was made just before I showed up.
Then I suggest we flip to Hostile. We clearly have the beginnings of
an axis of commie mut^H^H^Hevil here we
On Wed, May 27, 2009 at 9:43 PM, Kerim Aydin ke...@u.washington.edu wrote:
On Wed, 27 May 2009, Aaron Goldfein wrote:
Because I'm about to have imperial-style control over the nomic. And that
post announcing Fresh's death was made just before I showed up.
Then I suggest we flip to
Sorry guys, just doing a test that needs to go through the lists.
Apologies for spam.
coppro wrote:
Sean Hunt wrote:
Alex Smith wrote:
I CFJ on this; the issue of whether MIME messages containing both
plaintext and HTML are legal is a rather important one, and I think it
should go through the courts.
I favor this case.
I intend, with 2 support, to set the fine for this case
2009/5/28 Sean Hunt ride...@gmail.com:
Roger Hicks wrote:
I spend A# D F thrice to increase comex's caste by 3.
My apologies for overlooking this to begin with.
BobTHJ
One of these fails due to comex's caste being Alpha by that point (the
Conductor may wish to take note).
Which was why
I wrote:
coppro wrote:
Sean Hunt wrote:
Alex Smith wrote:
I CFJ on this; the issue of whether MIME messages containing both
plaintext and HTML are legal is a rather important one, and I think it
should go through the courts.
I favor this case.
I intend, with 2 support, to set the fine
27 matches
Mail list logo
