On 2 July 2013 03:30, Sgeo sgeos...@gmail.com wrote:
I feel uncomfortable with the notion that the punishment for a crime is
dictated by a seemingly unrelated rule, and if that rule changes, the
punishment could end up changing underneath people's feet.
Don't think of changing the registration
After less than two weeks of playing Nomic, when I was thinking this morning
that I needed to look up some details about a product, my internal monologue
told me that I needed to check the Ruleset for that.
Chuck
scshunt wrote:
I hereby initiate the Agoran Decision to select the Herald. The
candidates are scshunt and G., each with Proposed Salary 100.
The valid options are the candidates, the eligible voters are the
active players, and the vote collector is the IADoP. Voting is open
for one week.
G. wrote:
On Wed, 26 Jun 2013, Fool wrote:
On 26/06/2013 12:07 AM, Kerim Aydin wrote:
I was blocking on the term logician, that's a better choice. (Just had a
flashback to the day in grad school when I became a committed Bayesian,
maybe I was channeling).
Yeah man, you can get flashbacks
On 2 July 2013 13:10, Ed Murphy emurph...@socal.rr.com wrote:
scshunt wrote:
I hereby initiate the Agoran Decision to select the Herald. The
candidates are scshunt and G., each with Proposed Salary 100.
The valid options are the candidates, the eligible voters are the
active players, and the
On 2 July 2013 13:28, Charles Walker charles.w.wal...@gmail.com wrote:
On 2 July 2013 13:10, Ed Murphy emurph...@socal.rr.com wrote:
scshunt wrote:
I hereby initiate the Agoran Decision to select the Herald. The
candidates are scshunt and G., each with Proposed Salary 100.
The valid options
Walker wrote:
On 2 July 2013 13:10, Ed Murphy emurph...@socal.rr.com wrote:
scshunt wrote:
I hereby initiate the Agoran Decision to select the Herald. The
candidates are scshunt and G., each with Proposed Salary 100.
The valid options are the candidates, the eligible voters are the
active
since the census says i am inactive ibecome active again and do i just vote
here or is there a bizzare procedure to voting
On Tue, Jul 2, 2013 at 8:49 AM, Ed Murphy emurph...@socal.rr.com wrote:
Walker wrote:
On 2 July 2013 13:10, Ed Murphy emurph...@socal.rr.com wrote:
scshunt wrote:
I
On 2 July 2013 14:07, Max Schutz maxschutz...@gmail.com wrote:
since the census says i am inactive ibecome active again and do i just vote
here or is there a bizzare procedure to voting
There's no particularly bizzare procedure: you just write I vote for
X, or whatever. But both becoming active
On Jul 1, 2013, at 7:01 PM, omd wrote:
Note to self: This was never distributed. As I said, by next week, I
will have a script to avoid these way-too-frequent missed proposals.
Or you can replace me.
I initiate an election for Promotor, nominating myself.
—Machiavelli, who's still pretty
On 1 July 2013 23:35, Kerim Aydin ke...@u.washington.edu wrote:
On Mon, 1 Jul 2013, Charles Walker wrote:
On 29 April 2013 17:53, Kerim Aydin ke...@u.washington.edu wrote:
Proto: basic Infractions mechanism (Discuss!)
G., do you still intend to propose this?
I haven't taken it any further,
If an officer is required to perform a specific action (e.g. award N
Yaks to Walker) and the office changes hands, does that specific
requirement go along with it? Or is the new officer NOT GUILTY if e
fails to award me those particular Yaks? What if the office changes
hands one day before the end
On Tue, 2 Jul 2013, Charles Walker wrote:
On 1 July 2013 23:35, Kerim Aydin ke...@u.washington.edu wrote:
On Mon, 1 Jul 2013, Charles Walker wrote:
On 29 April 2013 17:53, Kerim Aydin ke...@u.washington.edu wrote:
Proto: basic Infractions mechanism (Discuss!)
G., do you still intend
Yes.
On Tue, Jul 2, 2013 at 12:48 PM, Charles Walker
charles.w.wal...@gmail.com wrote:
If an officer is required to perform a specific action (e.g. award N
Yaks to Walker) and the office changes hands, does that specific
requirement go along with it? Or is the new officer NOT GUILTY if e
On 2 July 2013 17:51, Kerim Aydin ke...@u.washington.edu wrote:
Well, here's a question for you (pertains to the Infractions proto too).
Should we try for a multi-currency system of some kind (with multiple
bank currencies of different liquidity) or stick with Yaks for everything
for the time
On Tue, 2 Jul 2013, Tanner Swett wrote:
I join UNDEAD.
Please provide the text of the agreement so that it
can be determined that you have willfully consented.
Note: providing the text of the UNDEAD agreement may
or may not be punishable.
On Tue, 2 Jul 2013, Charles Walker wrote:
If an officer is required to perform a specific action (e.g. award N
Yaks to Walker) and the office changes hands, does that specific
requirement go along with it? Or is the new officer NOT GUILTY if e
fails to award me those particular Yaks? What if
On Tue, 2 Jul 2013, Tanner Swett wrote:
On Jul 2, 2013, at 12:45 PM, Ed Murphy wrote:
Machiavelli wrote:
I join UNDEAD.
CoE: Over my dead body you do!
Denied.
On Jul 2, 2013, at 1:28 PM, Kerim Aydin wrote:
On Tue, 2 Jul 2013, Tanner Swett wrote:
I join UNDEAD.
Please
I support and do so!
On Jul 2, 2013 2:19 PM, Alex Smith ais...@bham.ac.uk wrote:
On Tue, 2013-07-02 at 14:12 -0400, omd wrote:
I intend, with two Independent support, to create a party with the
following constitution:
1. This party shall be known as the Best Party.
2. Any player may
I find all the instances of spend N Yaks, where N is the value of the
Something Switch, a Budget Switch and suchlike in the Rules to be
ugly. The Tax Rule is the worst (best?) example of this. Of course,
it's all my fault, because I mostly wrote the Rules in question, so
I'd like to rectify the
On Jul 2, 2013, at 2:35 PM, Kerim Aydin wrote:
On Tue, 2 Jul 2013, Tanner Swett wrote:
On Jul 2, 2013, at 1:28 PM, Kerim Aydin wrote:
Please provide the text of the agreement so that it
can be determined that you have willfully consented.
Note: providing the text of the UNDEAD agreement may
Roujo,
Would you mind putting programs.tar.gz and dump.txt.gz back on your
copy of the CotC database?
Thanks.
On Sun, Jun 30, 2013 at 4:40 PM, Charles Walker
charles.w.wal...@gmail.com wrote:
The Judgement column on this page isn't working, or indeed on any
other page which is a list of cases.
http://cotc.psychose.ca/list.php
-- Walker
Duly noted, although working through the backlog has priority
23 matches
Mail list logo
