On Tue, 16 Jul 2013, Steven Gardner wrote:
Entreco Rule 8, Idealism:
The state of Entreco is determined by what its players believe
that it is. The state of the game can be changed by the
consensus (including unintentionally, if a mistake is made in
applying the rules,
On 15 Jul 2013 22:29, omd c.ome...@gmail.com wrote:
Proposal: Voting auctions (AI=2, PF=Y50)
Weird: was just about to propose a similar thing, but the expiration date
mechanism is more interesting than what I had in mind. FOR.
omd wrote:
[Update 2: Nerfs to 45 days and brings back the Cabinet Secretary with
a different job. The wisdom of making the Cabinet Secretary a
Minister in the first place will have to be left to those better
versed in eighties-era TV shows.]
Admitted, Cabinet Secretary should really be a
John Smith wrote:
If I were a player, I'd call for reconsideration. But since I'm not,
could someone else please do so?
You should register.
On Mon, 15 Jul 2013, omd wrote:
On Mon, Jul 15, 2013 at 4:27 PM, Sean Hunt scsh...@csclub.uwaterloo.ca
wrote:
Additionally, I would think that A person's defined privileges are
assumed to exist in the absence of an explicit, binding agreement to
the contrary. would be construed as
On Jul 16, 2013 4:00 PM, Kerim Aydin ke...@u.washington.edu wrote:
I spend 3 VCs to increase Walker's VVLOP by 3.
INEFFECTIVE as all VCs were destroyed.
I vote for Fool in the General Election.
INEFFECTIVE, as the posting period is over. Same for the rest of the
message.
-scshunt
On Tue, 16 Jul 2013, Sean Hunt wrote:
I vote for Fool in the General Election.
INEFFECTIVE, as the posting period is over. Same for the rest of the message.
Huh? this was date-stamped 30 seconds before the voting period ended...
did I miss something on timing here?
You appear to be correct by about 30 seconds.
-scshunt
On Tue, Jul 16, 2013 at 4:11 PM, Kerim Aydin ke...@u.washington.edu wrote:
On Tue, 16 Jul 2013, Sean Hunt wrote:
I vote for Fool in the General Election.
INEFFECTIVE, as the posting period is over. Same for the rest of the message.
On Tue, Jul 16, 2013 at 4:32 PM, Alex Smith ais...@bham.ac.uk wrote:
(Note that vps.qoid.us's
clock is wrong, with me receiving both emails before the mailing lists
sent them; however, the difference between the times it states is
presumably constant, unless its clock was adjusted in between.)
On Tue, Jul 16, 2013 at 5:56 PM, omd c.ome...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Jul 16, 2013 at 5:51 PM, omd c.ome...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Jul 16, 2013 at 5:49 PM, omd c.ome...@gmail.com wrote:
Testing list upgrade.
And again.
Now it should work.
Maybe now?
2013/7/16 omd c.ome...@gmail.com:
On Tue, Jul 16, 2013 at 5:56 PM, omd c.ome...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Jul 16, 2013 at 5:51 PM, omd c.ome...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Jul 16, 2013 at 5:49 PM, omd c.ome...@gmail.com wrote:
Testing list upgrade.
And again.
Now it should work.
Maybe now?
On Tue, 2013-07-16 at 17:59 -0400, omd wrote:
2013/7/16 omd c.ome...@gmail.com:
On Tue, Jul 16, 2013 at 5:56 PM, omd c.ome...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Jul 16, 2013 at 5:51 PM, omd c.ome...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Jul 16, 2013 at 5:49 PM, omd c.ome...@gmail.com wrote:
Testing list
2013/7/16 omd c.ome...@gmail.com:
Derp.
Apologies for the spam/brief outage; I was switching Mailman to a
local bzr checkout in order to properly implement Date-restamping
later.
On Tue, Jul 16, 2013 at 6:03 PM, Alex Smith ais...@bham.ac.uk wrote:
Also, if you're upgrading the lists, then at least for a bit you're
preventing me from participating in the fora :(
According to scshunt's recent arguments, Rule 101 platonically
prevented me from doing so! So I guess the
On Tue, 2013-07-16 at 18:05 -0400, omd wrote:
On Tue, Jul 16, 2013 at 6:03 PM, Alex Smith ais...@bham.ac.uk wrote:
Also, if you're upgrading the lists, then at least for a bit you're
preventing me from participating in the fora :(
According to scshunt's recent arguments, Rule 101
On Tue, 16 Jul 2013, Alex Smith wrote:
More Interesting Timing Scams (AI 3, Proposal Fee Y20)
Add a new paragraph to rule 478, just before its last paragraph:
{{{
As an exception to the rest of this rule, no message is a public message
if, during the 1-hour period that ends when that
On Tue, 2013-07-16 at 23:31 +0200, Ørjan Johansen wrote:
I note that this can just as well be used by the perpretators of a
votebomb to allow them to make it early, and then silence any
countermeasures until the end of the voting period.
Yeah, thus my comments about the proper timing being
On Tue, 16 Jul 2013, Alex Smith wrote:
On Tue, 2013-07-16 at 13:11 -0700, Kerim Aydin wrote:
On Tue, 16 Jul 2013, Sean Hunt wrote:
I vote for Fool in the General Election.
INEFFECTIVE, as the posting period is over. Same for the rest of the
message.
Huh? this was
Right. Mailman is really vintage code... The list should now:
- rewrite date headers to be the actual time of receipt, as briefly
attempted before;
- include a new X-Timestamp header to provide additional precision if required;
- by default, only send back copies of list mail if the subject was
19 matches
Mail list logo
