On 28 Aug 2013, at 22:53, Ed Murphy emurph...@socal.rr.com wrote:
Fool wrote:
On 01/08/2013 1:34 PM, omd wrote:
* I also attempt to distribute this with Chamber of each of Green,
Red, and Purple (in that case, the proposal is separately Ordinary).
What's that about? Nice colour scheme
I don't mind becoming active to judge the case. I should be able to get to
it this weekend.
On 2013-08-27 4:04 PM, Kerim Aydin ke...@u.washington.edu wrote:
On Tue, 27 Aug 2013, Kerim Aydin wrote:
Appeal 3383a
- REMAND without prejudice (Woggle)
- no opinion (Walker, Wooble)
Walker wrote:
This was a reference to a rule from a few years ago: basically, your
voting limit varied based on a rock-paper-scissors type interaction
between your chamber and that of the proposal's author.
Was that any good? I don't think I hung around long enough to see how that
played
On Thu, 29 Aug 2013, Ed Murphy wrote:
Walker wrote:
This was a reference to a rule from a few years ago: basically, your
voting limit varied based on a rock-paper-scissors type interaction
between your chamber and that of the proposal's author.
Was that any good? I don't think
C-walker and I have been discussing the possibility of a nommit-Agora chess
game as an initial attempt at internomic relations. Basically, each nomic
would have a (part of a) rule that looks like this:
The nommit-Agora chess game is played between those two nomics. Each nomic
shall submit its
wait would we discuss aech move as a group before submission or is there
just one player who makes those decisions
On Thu, Aug 29, 2013 at 1:04 PM, James Beirne james.m.bei...@gmail.comwrote:
C-walker and I have been discussing the possibility of a nommit-Agora
chess game as an initial
I think it would be up to each nomic how to come up with its moves.
On Thu, Aug 29, 2013 at 1:11 PM, Max Schutz maxschutz...@gmail.com wrote:
wait would we discuss aech move as a group before submission or is there
just one player who makes those decisions
On Thu, Aug 29, 2013 at 1:04 PM,
On Sun, Aug 25, 2013 at 11:45 AM, Charles Walker charles.w.wal...@gmail.com
wrote:
I announce that it is my intent, assuming the absence of a trio (or
greater) of objectors within the defined time period, to cause the
Mutability Index to have a value of 10.
I will object for something
I think it would be properly Agoran to have our move adopted by proposal.
Though we would need some mechanism to resolve simultaneous proposals.
--
OscarMeyr
I dunno, officer can do it with Agoran Consent seems pretty
thoroughly Agoran to me.
On Thu, Aug 29, 2013 at 1:32 PM, Benjamin Schultz
ben.dov.schu...@gmail.com wrote:
I think it would be properly Agoran to have our move adopted by proposal.
Though we would need some mechanism to resolve
On Thu, 29 Aug 2013, Craig Daniel wrote:
I dunno, officer can do it with Agoran Consent seems pretty
thoroughly Agoran to me.
A slight tweak to that.
Any player can make a 'candidate move' by announcement. Candidate
moves can be Supported or Objected to. After the usual Notice period
On 2013-08-29 2:32 PM, Benjamin Schultz ben.dov.schu...@gmail.com wrote:
I think it would be properly Agoran to have our move adopted by proposal.
Though we would need some mechanism to resolve simultaneous proposals.
--
OscarMeyr
One potential problem with that would be if there was
wait explain how the deuce they are faster than us at proposals a nomic is
a nomic is a nomic isn't it
On Thu, Aug 29, 2013 at 2:26 PM, James Beirne james.m.bei...@gmail.comwrote:
On 2013-08-29 2:32 PM, Benjamin Schultz ben.dov.schu...@gmail.com
wrote:
I think it would be properly Agoran
On Thu, Aug 29, 2013 at 3:23 PM, Max Schutz maxschutz...@gmail.com wrote:
wait explain how the deuce they are faster than us at proposals a nomic is a
nomic is a nomic isn't it
A nomic I've played (in meatspace, mind you) had a proposal turnaround
time of about 30 seconds. The player read eir
FTR, nommit's turnaround time is under a week (voting begins every Friday).
On Thu, Aug 29, 2013 at 4:39 PM, Jonathan Rouillard
jonathan.rouill...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Aug 29, 2013 at 3:23 PM, Max Schutz maxschutz...@gmail.com
wrote:
wait explain how the deuce they are faster than us
Right. You can also get very different gameplay starting from
precisely the same initial rules - look at Agora vs. B in the era when
its ruleset was derived from an Agoran one. That's because even if the
rules start the same, they evolve - that's what makes it nomic!
On Thu, Aug 29, 2013 at 3:39
FWIW, I did actually consider them. I didn't address them because a) they
were only briefly alluded to and did not change my opinion, and b) I was
typing this on my phone.
Is it necessary for a judge to address every argument in a case or only the
ones they consider pertinent to their judgement?
On Thu, 29 Aug 2013, Max Schutz wrote:
I sit (I think that's what i do if i am interested in recieving ases)
Yep. All you have to do now is wait.
are there certain formats i need to use when doing this and don't just say
read the rules visual impairement and asperger syndrome mix very
interestingly
On Thu, Aug 29, 2013 at 5:34 PM, Kerim Aydin ke...@u.washington.edu wrote:
On Thu, 29 Aug 2013, Max Schutz wrote:
I sit (I think that's
Nope! When you're assigned to a case, just post your judgement (TRUE, FALSE,
or the other options) to the PF along with your arguments for the judgement.
Exact format doesn't matter.
On Thu, 29 Aug 2013, Max Schutz wrote:
are there certain formats i need to use when doing this and don't just
20 matches
Mail list logo
