Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Re: OFF: [Herald] Hear Ye, Hear Ye!

2015-07-21 Thread Kerim Aydin 


On Tue, 21 Jul 2015, Sean Hunt wrote:
 On Tue, Jul 21, 2015 at 12:54 PM, Kerim Aydin ke...@u.washington.edu wrote:
  On Mon, 20 Jul 2015, Sean Hunt wrote:
  WHEREAS, new research indicates that Rule 106 in fact set the power
  Proposal 7448 to 4 prior to its taking effect;
 
  When an unproven counterfactual argument goes against the dominant
  current records, and a CFJ on the matter has been called, any further
  diverging the gamestate is Bad Form, no matter how strongly you
  feel about your argument.
 
 Erp, I missed that a CFJ had been called. My apologies. You're right.


no worries!  I'll deputize to assign the CFJ if no one jumps into the 
Arbitor role by tomorrow.  -t.

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Re: OFF: [Herald] Hear Ye, Hear Ye!

2015-07-21 Thread Sean Hunt 
On Jul 21, 2015 14:01, Kerim Aydin ke...@u.washington.edu wrote:
 no worries!  I'll deputize to assign the CFJ if no one jumps into the
 Arbitor role by tomorrow.  -t.

I'll revoke the proclamation if it turns out to be wrong.

-scshunt

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Re: OFF: [Herald] Hear Ye, Hear Ye!

2015-07-21 Thread omd 
On Tue, Jul 21, 2015 at 2:00 PM, Kerim Aydin ke...@u.washington.edu wrote:
 no worries!  I'll deputize to assign the CFJ if no one jumps into the
 Arbitor role by tomorrow.  -t.

I'm willing to do it, but do you have a copy of the current state of
your interested judge list?

(t.?)

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Re: OFF: [Herald] Hear Ye, Hear Ye!

2015-07-21 Thread Kerim Aydin 


On Tue, 21 Jul 2015, omd wrote:
 On Tue, Jul 21, 2015 at 2:00 PM, Kerim Aydin ke...@u.washington.edu wrote:
  no worries!  I'll deputize to assign the CFJ if no one jumps into the
  Arbitor role by tomorrow.  -t.
 
 I'm willing to do it, but do you have a copy of the current state of
 your interested judge list?

I announced a couple months ago that I was defining interested by
voted at least once in the last couple weeks of Assessor's reports, 
and hasn't explicitly said they *weren't* interested.  In other
words, being interested enough to play Agora actively means being
interested enough to do judicial duty.

I changed this because I had old interested people who hadn't
posted for a while, so I didn't expect them to return judgements.

Haven't made a list from latest Assessor's report.  Only opt-out
was aranea for specified vacation dates but those dates have passed 
(I think!)

-G.

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Re: OFF: [Herald] Hear Ye, Hear Ye!

2015-07-21 Thread omd 
On Tue, Jul 21, 2015 at 2:50 PM, Kerim Aydin ke...@u.washington.edu wrote:
 I announced a couple months ago that I was defining interested by
 voted at least once in the last couple weeks of Assessor's reports,
 and hasn't explicitly said they *weren't* interested.  In other
 words, being interested enough to play Agora actively means being
 interested enough to do judicial duty.

 I changed this because I had old interested people who hadn't
 posted for a while, so I didn't expect them to return judgements.

 Haven't made a list from latest Assessor's report.  Only opt-out
 was aranea for specified vacation dates but those dates have passed
 (I think!)

Ah, thanks.  In that case...

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Re: OFF: [Herald] Hear Ye, Hear Ye!

2015-07-21 Thread Luis Ressel 
On Tue, 21 Jul 2015 11:50:28 -0700 (PDT)
Kerim Aydin ke...@u.washington.edu wrote:

 Haven't made a list from latest Assessor's report.  Only opt-out
 was aranea for specified vacation dates but those dates have passed 
 (I think!)

Yes, those have long passed. However, I also probably won't have time
for judging from 15. Aug to 15. Sep.

--
aranea