Re: DIS: Promotor office

2016-10-13 Thread Alexis Hunt
Oh, no, not at all. I just was at work and didn't have time to write a
longer reply. I appreciate you nominating me, but I'm not able to take it
on right now.

Alexis

On Thu, Oct 13, 2016 at 9:33 PM Aris Merchant <
thoughtsoflifeandligh...@gmail.com> wrote:

> Okay. Sorry if that came off mean, but you are a bit... unpredictable. Did
> that just make it worse? (Sigh.) I'm not great at talking to people.
>
> -Aris
>
>
> On Thursday, October 13, 2016, Alexis Hunt  wrote:
>
> On Thu, Oct 13, 2016, 18:50 Aris Merchant <
> thoughtsoflifeandligh...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Thanks. Before e thinks of it emself, I'd like to politely request that
> Alexis doesn't just come in and take this one. E's already Referee, and the
> rest of us have to have some fun. I'd really like to have something to
> do. Besides, at this rate e may be speaker soon.
>
> -Aris
>
>
> I don't currently have time for Promotor.
>
> Alexis
>
>


Re: DIS: Promotor office

2016-10-13 Thread Aris Merchant
Okay. Sorry if that came off mean, but you are a bit... unpredictable. Did
that just make it worse? (Sigh.) I'm not great at talking to people.

-Aris

On Thursday, October 13, 2016, Alexis Hunt  wrote:

> On Thu, Oct 13, 2016, 18:50 Aris Merchant  gmail.com
> >
> wrote:
>
>> Thanks. Before e thinks of it emself, I'd like to politely request that
>> Alexis doesn't just come in and take this one. E's already Referee, and the
>> rest of us have to have some fun. I'd really like to have something to
>> do. Besides, at this rate e may be speaker soon.
>>
>> -Aris
>>
>>>
> I don't currently have time for Promotor.
>
> Alexis
>


Re: DIS: Promotor office

2016-10-13 Thread Alexis Hunt
On Thu, Oct 13, 2016, 18:50 Aris Merchant <
thoughtsoflifeandligh...@gmail.com> wrote:

> Thanks. Before e thinks of it emself, I'd like to politely request that
> Alexis doesn't just come in and take this one. E's already Referee, and the
> rest of us have to have some fun. I'd really like to have something to
> do. Besides, at this rate e may be speaker soon.
>
> -Aris
>
>
I don't currently have time for Promotor.

Alexis


Re: DIS: Promotor office

2016-10-13 Thread Aris Merchant
Thanks. Before e thinks of it emself, I'd like to politely request that
Alexis doesn't just come in and take this one. E's already Referee, and the
rest of us have to have some fun. I'd really like to have something to
do. Besides, at this rate e may be speaker soon.

-Aris

On Thursday, October 13, 2016, Luis Ressel  wrote:

> On Thu, 13 Oct 2016 21:53:25 +0100
> ais523 > wrote:
>
> > Bear in mind that deputisation requires intent, unless the office is
> > empty or the action is more than fourteen days overdue.
>
> I'm aware, but as I've been a slacker for a whole month now, no
> announcement of intent is neccessary in this case.
>
> --
> aranes
>


Re: DIS: Promotor office

2016-10-13 Thread Luis Ressel
On Thu, 13 Oct 2016 21:53:25 +0100
ais523  wrote:

> Bear in mind that deputisation requires intent, unless the office is
> empty or the action is more than fourteen days overdue.

I'm aware, but as I've been a slacker for a whole month now, no
announcement of intent is neccessary in this case.

-- 
aranes


Re: DIS: Promotor office

2016-10-13 Thread ais523
On Thu, 2016-10-13 at 22:48 +0200, Luis Ressel wrote:
> On Thu, 13 Oct 2016 09:57:41 -0700
> Aris Merchant  wrote:
> 
> > 
> > I looked at the responsibilities, and it doesn't look to bad. I'll
> > take it in the short run and see how it works out. Do we need to have
> > an election?
> > 
> Thanks, that's a relief! No, calling an election is not neccessary, we
> can use deputisation instead. I'll neglect to mention the state of the
> Proposal Pool when I distribute the current Proposals tomorrow.
> Because I haven't performed this duty for over a month now, you'll then
> be able to assume the Promotor office via deputisation (e.g. "I
> deputise for the Promotor to publish the following Promotor report: The
> Proposal Pool is currently empty.")

Bear in mind that deputisation requires intent, unless the office is
empty or the action is more than fourteen days overdue.

-- 
ais523


Re: DIS: Re: BUS: All right, I'll try it later

2016-10-13 Thread ais523
On Thu, 2016-10-13 at 12:56 -0700, Kerim Aydin wrote:
> I was kind of hoping that current Speaker ais523 might demonstrate
> this power to keep eir office :).

Oh, I was thinking that if there was actual desire for a new Speaker, I
wasn't going to override the rest of Agora on that. It wouldn't be very
effective because I could still be ousted by proposal; there's not much
point in scamming when obvious counterscams exist (and if I had a
method of blocking arbitrary proposals, I'd save it for a time when I
could get more out of it than just the Speakership).

Additionally, political power in Agora atm is fairly useless because
there isn't enough of an economy to interfere in.

-- 
ais523


Re: DIS: Promotor office

2016-10-13 Thread Luis Ressel
On Thu, 13 Oct 2016 09:57:41 -0700
Aris Merchant  wrote:

> I looked at the responsibilities, and it doesn't look to bad. I'll
> take it in the short run and see how it works out. Do we need to have
> an election?
> 

Thanks, that's a relief! No, calling an election is not neccessary, we
can use deputisation instead. I'll neglect to mention the state of the
Proposal Pool when I distribute the current Proposals tomorrow.
Because I haven't performed this duty for over a month now, you'll then
be able to assume the Promotor office via deputisation (e.g. "I
deputise for the Promotor to publish the following Promotor report: The
Proposal Pool is currently empty.")

-- 
aranea


Re: DIS: Re: BUS: All right, I'll try it later

2016-10-13 Thread Aris Merchant
Thanks. The gameplay details seemed right?

-Aris

On Thu, Oct 13, 2016 at 12:21 PM, ais523 
wrote:

> On Thu, 2016-10-13 at 12:07 -0700, Aris Merchant wrote:
> > I'm afraid I oppose. The office of speaker has veto power,  and I'm not
> > sure if I trust em that much after es (Is that the right pronoun?) last
> CFJ.
>
> "eir".
>
> --
> ais523
>


Re: DIS: Re: BUS: All right, I'll try it later

2016-10-13 Thread Kerim Aydin


On Thu, 13 Oct 2016, ais523 wrote:
> On Thu, 2016-10-13 at 12:07 -0700, Aris Merchant wrote:
> > I'm afraid I oppose. The office of speaker has veto power,  and I'm not
> > sure if I trust em that much after es (Is that the right pronoun?) last CFJ.
> 
> "eir".
> 
> -- 
> ais523

I was kind of hoping that current Speaker ais523 might demonstrate this power 
to keep eir office :).

The intent has in fact timed out; having pointed out the Speaker-changing 
possibility I'll let others re-intend/fight it out if desired...

Also: last few weeks unexpectedly busy, should catch up reports myself in next 
week, apologies.

-G.




Re: DIS: Re: BUS: All right, I'll try it later

2016-10-13 Thread ais523
On Thu, 2016-10-13 at 12:07 -0700, Aris Merchant wrote:
> I'm afraid I oppose. The office of speaker has veto power,  and I'm not
> sure if I trust em that much after es (Is that the right pronoun?) last CFJ.

"eir".

-- 
ais523


DIS: Re: BUS: All right, I'll try it later

2016-10-13 Thread Aris Merchant
I'm afraid I oppose. The office of speaker has veto power,  and I'm not
sure if I trust em that much after es (Is that the right pronoun?) last CFJ.

-Aris

On Thu, Oct 13, 2016 at 3:36 AM, Luis Ressel  wrote:

> On Thu, 22 Sep 2016 11:40:36 -0700 (PDT)
> Kerim Aydin  wrote:
>
> > Well if *speaker* rather than *champion is what you're after:
> >
> > I announce my intent to appoint Alexis to the office of Speaker,
> > with Support.  (90+ day limit passed).
> >
>
> I support, despite not being sure if this type of intent can time out.
>
> --
> aranea
>


Re: DIS: Promotor office

2016-10-13 Thread Aris Merchant
I looked at the responsibilities, and it doesn't look to bad. I'll take it
in the short run and see how it works out. Do we need to have an election?

-Aris

On Thu, Oct 13, 2016 at 3:29 AM, Luis Ressel  wrote:

> I'll distribute the pending proposals tomorrow, but the Promotor office
> is currently a bit of a burden for me. Is someone interested in taking
> it over (permanently or at least temporarily until November)?
>
> In related news, I'm not interested in judging CFJs until November.
>
> --
> aranea
>