I actually attempted to deputize you for *last months* negligence as well,
because "At the start of each month, if Agora owns at least one Estate, the
Surveyor shall put one Estate which is owned by Agora up for auction, by
announcement." is still true 'at the start of the month' even if you've put
I vote as follows:
> ID Author(s)AI Title Pender Pend fee
> ---
> 7866* o, Quazie, [1] 1.7 More Betterer Pledges[2] o 6 sh.
FOR.
I’ll happily take on faith that it’s
I vote as follows:
> ID Author(s)AI Title Pender Pend fee
> (sh.)
> ---
> 7865* Aris, o, [1] 3.1 Regulations v4 Aris 6
FOR.
> 7866* o, Quazie, [2] 1.7 More Bet
On Jul 4, 2017, at 9:07 AM, CuddleBeam wrote:
> I deputize for the role of Surveyor and put Cagliostro up for Auction.
> (Arguably, its past the "start of the month”.)
I skimmed the ensuing thread. I’m honestly in no position to tell whether your
attempt to deputize succeeded. I’m less than se
Cuddlebeam has nothing to do with these proposals? Please reconsider CFJ
3520 and fix the obvious error.
On Wed, Jul 5, 2017 at 2:24 PM Publius Scribonius Scholasticus <
p.scribonius.scholasti...@googlemail.com> wrote:
> I find CFJ 3520 TRUE as the proposal was submitted by G., while he was
> ac
I move to enter this judgement into moot.
Publius Scribonius Scholasticus
p.scribonius.scholasti...@gmail.com
> On Jul 5, 2017, at 4:35 PM, V.J Rada wrote:
>
> This contains my motion to reconsider and my
> adressing your argument (although cursorily)
>
> On Wed, Jul 5, 2017 at 6:42 PM,
Except you should observe that an action does not cause the property to be
transferred. A person must still cause it to be transferred.
Publius Scribonius Scholasticus
p.scribonius.scholasti...@gmail.com
> On Jul 5, 2017, at 1:42 PM, V.J Rada wrote:
>
> I move to reconsider (you can't, y
Ah, OK. All good, thank you.
Enviado desde mi iPhone
> El 5 jul 2017, a las 22:35, V.J Rada escribió:
>
> I move to reconsider (you can't, you cndan intend to move
> and wait for two support.
>
> I'm judging this FALSE. GASP! Surprise rocks the nation.
> I'm not judging it FALSE because auctio
Where did you post the reconsideration? I only find the original Judgement.
> El 5 jul 2017, a las 22:19, V.J Rada escribió:
>
> Posting to business because each A-D post might
> be a seperate breach.
>
> I already moved to reconsider and did so. You can
> now intend to, with two support, enter
I do that.
Enviado desde mi iPhone
> El 5 jul 2017, a las 19:42, V.J Rada escribió:
>
> I move to reconsider (you can't, you cndan intend to move
> and wait for two support.
>
> I'm judging this FALSE. GASP! Surprise rocks the nation.
> I'm not judging it FALSE because auctioning is a regulate
I motion to reconsider.
Whether the winning bid can actually make a transfer or not shouldn't
affect if there is actually an *auction* or not in the first place, I
believe.
On Wed, Jul 5, 2017 at 11:14 AM, V.J Rada wrote:
> I'm judging this FALSE. GASP! Surprise rocks the nation.
> I'm not jud
haha suck it
On Wed, Jul 5, 2017 at 10:26 AM, V.J Rada wrote:
> I promise not to post in agora discussion within the period of the sun's
> existence
>
12 matches
Mail list logo
