I am proud to announce the rebirth of InterNomic II. It is hosted at
http://internomic2.wikidot.com/ and includes a fully functioning set of
forums. (The groups 'General' and 'Off-topic' under 'General' in the forums
allow for anonymous and non-member posts if you want to try it out without
I'm just checking up on how things are progressing regarding joining
InterNomic over here. Elsewhere it looks like we have 4 nomics ready to join
(If you wait for B Nomic to catch up in around 6 days).
C-walker
Oh. I guess it still counts as a nomic.
On Sun, Mar 22, 2009 at 7:30 PM, Aaron Goldfein aarongoldf...@gmail.comwrote:
I researched this Fresh Nomic a little bit and I've found that they have
exactly one member who is literally playing nomic by himself.
Oh, and there's also Faucet Nomic.
On Sun, Mar 22, 2009 at 7:34 PM, Charles Walker
charles.w.wal...@googlemail.com wrote:
Oh. I guess it still counts as a nomic.
On Sun, Mar 22, 2009 at 7:30 PM, Aaron Goldfein
aarongoldf...@gmail.comwrote:
I researched this Fresh Nomic a little bit
You should keep it general, but you need to mention who is going to vote on
Agora's behalf as the liaison. You could say something along the lines of
'Where another nomic makes it possible for Agora or a representative of
Agora to perform actions within that nomic, X (person or post) may, without
Well I don't actually play Agora so I wouldn't know. I'ts probably better to
change the Ambassador rule.
C-walker
On Mon, Mar 23, 2009 at 9:51 AM, Jonatan Kilhamn
jonatan.kilh...@gmail.comwrote:
This X should probably be an office, but I'm not sure which one: first
I thought the natural choice
Hey, I've just researched this again and not including me, there are 3
members: http://groups.google.com/group/fresh-nomic?pli=1
On Sun, Mar 22, 2009 at 7:30 PM, Aaron Goldfein aarongoldf...@gmail.comwrote:
I researched this Fresh Nomic a little bit and I've found that they have
exactly one
True. On InterNomic he mentioned that all four players know each other in
real life, so I assumed...
On Mon, Mar 23, 2009 at 7:59 PM, Jonatan Kilhamn
jonatan.kilh...@gmail.comwrote:
Yes, but do they play? I can't find any message by anyone other than
kennercat...
2009/3/23 Charles Walker
Agora can join B now. It just needs to post to spoon-business that it has
decided to become a faction.
On Thu, Mar 19, 2009 at 10:26 PM, Warrigal
ihope12...@gmail.comihope127%...@gmail.com
wrote:
On Thu, Mar 19, 2009 at 5:16 PM, Jonatan Kilhamn
jonatan.kilh...@gmail.com wrote:
We should so
I accept that comment. I'll think about a new ruleset and we'll see what the
'nomic landscape' looks like in a few months.
On Fri, Apr 17, 2009 at 3:41 PM, Elliott Hird
penguinoftheg...@googlemail.com wrote:
Well, Agora did the original InterNomic. I for one think that IN2's
ruleset is too
A discussion I just started over at B led to the following:
Warrigal:
I think it would be possible to make B Nomic a public contract without
the objection of a party. This is an Agoran action, so the
announcement of intent and objections both have to go to Agora; one
does not need to be a player
C-walker, please.
C-walker
On Sat, Apr 25, 2009 at 6:06 PM, Aaron Goldfein aarongoldf...@gmail.comwrote:
On Sat, Apr 25, 2009 at 5:55 AM, Charles Walker
charles.w.wal...@googlemail.com wrote:
I register.
C-walker
Welcome. Is there any nickname you would like to use?
Hey, I'm new here too so I don't know much, but there is this FAQ which was
published a while ago:
Agora Nomic FAQ
last updated 4/22/09
Q. What's with the funny pronouns?
A. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Spivak_pronoun (Agora traditionally
uses e as subject and emself as reflexive).
Q.
Here's a greeting card to go with it:
---
| |
|You Play |
| Nomic ? |
| |
|Get well |
| soon... |
| |
---
C-walker
On Tue, Apr 28, 2009 at 4:29 PM, comex com...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Apr 28, 2009 at 11:24 AM, Elliott Hird
I endorse Tiger.
C-walker
On Wed, May 6, 2009 at 12:04 PM, Geoffrey Spear geoffsp...@gmail.comwrote:
On Tue, May 5, 2009 at 10:03 PM, Aaron Goldfein aarongoldf...@gmail.com
wrote:
I initiate an Agoran decision to choose the holder of the Anarchist
office. The eligible voters are the
On Fri, May 8, 2009 at 4:39 PM, Geoffrey Spear geoffsp...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, May 4, 2009 at 9:31 PM, Quazie quazieno...@gmail.com wrote:
i am a separate person from quazie and i register at this e-mail
address with a nickname of 'gwen.'
I create a White ribbon in gwen's possession.
Oh, thanks.
C-walker
On Fri, May 8, 2009 at 4:57 PM, Geoffrey Spear geoffsp...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, May 8, 2009 at 11:45 AM, Charles Walker
charles.w.wal...@googlemail.com wrote:
I create a White ribbon in gwen's possession.
Can I have one of those?
You gained one when you
InterNomic II already knows ;)
C-walker
On Sat, May 9, 2009 at 1:26 PM, Alex Smith ais...@bham.ac.uk wrote:
On Fri, 2009-05-01 at 23:18 +0100, Alex Smith wrote:
I intend, without objection, to flip the Recognition of Internomic II
http://internomic2.wikidot.com/ to Neutral.
Without
Oh, sorry. Normally I get an email when someone requests membership. I've
accepted your application, just remember to log in before you try and post.
C-walker
On Sat, May 9, 2009 at 1:41 PM, Alex Smith ais...@bham.ac.uk wrote:
On Sat, 2009-05-09 at 13:35 +0100, Charles Walker wrote
On Sun, May 10, 2009 at 2:41 AM, Aaron Goldfein aarongoldf...@gmail.comwrote:
The archives should be molded to fit the needs of the game, not the game
molded to fit the needs of the archives.
I would agree with that if there seemed to be any point in using plain
text attachments.
Oh, sorry. I didn't know that.
On Sun, May 10, 2009 at 4:49 PM, Sean Hunt ride...@gmail.com wrote:
There was in that circumstance. The puzzle required tab characters to
work properly and they were being dropped. As a result, it had to be
sent as an attachment.
--
C-walker
On Mon, May 11, 2009 at 7:48 PM, Jonatan Kilhamn
jonatan.kilh...@gmail.comwrote:
I initiate a Call of Equity regarding this action. As Murphy has
already been the contestmaster you SHALL NOT flip the contestmaster to
em.
(When it comes to rules the easy way to do this is to publish an NoV,
Proto:
(AI = 2)
In the rule The Senate replace
A Senator is any first-class player who has been registered
continuously for the immediately preceding sixty days.
with
A Senator is a first-class player who meets one or more of the following
criteria:
1) They have been continuously registered
I don't think this worked first time round, so:
-- Forwarded message --
From: Charles Walker charles.w.wal...@googlemail.com
Date: Tue, May 12, 2009 at 7:47 PM
Subject: DIS: Proto: Senators
To: agora-discussion agora-discussion@agoranomic.org
Proto:
(AI = 2)
In the rule
On Wed, May 13, 2009 at 8:04 PM, Ed Murphy emurph...@socal.rr.com wrote:
Taral wrote:
On Tue, May 12, 2009 at 9:51 PM, Kerim Aydin ke...@u.washington.edu
wrote:
Oh bribery proposals are cute. It's a good test every so often to see
if the current players are a group of voters you want to
On Sat, May 16, 2009 at 2:46 AM, Taral tar...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, May 15, 2009 at 6:36 PM, Aaron Goldfein aarongoldf...@gmail.com
wrote:
Or we could just... you know... change the quorum rules.
Or the activity rules. In B nomic, one is only active in a sense if
one has voted in the
On Sat, May 30, 2009 at 7:31 AM, Kyle Marek-Spartz zeckal...@gmail.comwrote:
zeckalpha is to be registered.
Welcome. You may find the following useful if you've never played before:
[ With thanks to Murphy ]
Agora Nomic FAQ
last updated 4/22/09
Q. What's with the funny pronouns?
A.
On Sat, May 30, 2009 at 3:28 PM, Alex Smith ais...@bham.ac.uk wrote:
[NOTE: In order to aid other officers who need to know whether
Ambassador duties have been done or not, I'm now adding them to the
history of this report.]
Foreign relations
No matter what I do, this report /always/ flips
On Wed, Jun 3, 2009 at 4:40 PM, comex com...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Jun 3, 2009 at 11:33 AM, Charles Walker
charles.w.wal...@googlemail.com wrote:
On Wed, Jun 3, 2009 at 4:28 PM, comex com...@gmail.com wrote:
I initiate a Motion to Amend, specifying the following amendment (in
diff
On Wed, Jun 3, 2009 at 7:29 PM, Quazie quazieno...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Jun 3, 2009 at 2:05 PM, Roger Hicks pidge...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Jun 3, 2009 at 11:35, Kerim Aydinke...@u.washington.edu wrote:
On Wed, 3 Jun 2009, Elliott Hird wrote:
Get off my lawn! Even I lurked for a
On Thu, Jun 4, 2009 at 7:28 PM, Benjamin Caplan
celestialcognit...@gmail.com wrote:
Charles Walker wrote:
A player CAN cause another person to cease to be a Senator with Senator
Consent.
Presumably this is supposed to mean with something like Agoran Consent,
except that only Senators can
{ AI 2, II 2
[ This allows players to choose Representatives through contracts, who can
vote on their behalf in decisions
Create a new power 2 Rule:
{{
A Constituency is a public contract identifying itself as such. A
Constituency requires at least 3 parties.
A player SHALL NOT attempt to
On Sat, Jun 6, 2009 at 12:26 PM, Charles Walker
charles.w.wal...@googlemail.com wrote:
{ AI 2, II 2
[ This allows players to choose Representatives through contracts, who
can vote on their behalf in decisions
I didn't finish this description, so here's a completed one:
[ This allows
On Sun, Jun 7, 2009 at 11:38 AM, Ed Murphy emurph...@socal.rr.com wrote:
c-walker wrote:
On Sun, Jun 7, 2009 at 11:18 AM, Ed Murphy emurph...@socal.rr.com
mailto:emurph...@socal.rr.com wrote:
Flight Schedule
If I haven't already, I join this contract.
It lets you, but you
On Sun, Jun 7, 2009 at 2:46 PM, Paul VanKoughnett allisp...@gmail.comwrote:
On Sun, Jun 7, 2009 at 9:07 AM, Jonatan
Kilhamnjonatan.kilh...@gmail.com wrote:
2009/6/7 Aaron Goldfein aarongoldf...@gmail.com:
On Sat, Jun 6, 2009 at 6:55 PM, Jonatan Kilhamn
jonatan.kilh...@gmail.com
On Sun, Jun 7, 2009 at 4:42 PM, Aaron Goldfein aarongoldf...@gmail.comwrote:
If I haven't already, I join this contract.
You can't join this contract.
R2198:
If a contract does not purport to regulate becoming a party to it, then any
person CAN become a party to it by announcement.
--
On Tue, Jun 9, 2009 at 11:38 PM, Taral tar...@gmail.com wrote:
What about making Distributability like NoVs, where it's with N
support? You get one free proposal per week...
Great idea.
--
C-walker, who clearly intends this message to be public.
On Wed, Jun 10, 2009 at 1:57 AM, Benjamin Caplan
celestialcognit...@gmail.com wrote:
Jonatan Kilhamn wrote:
2009/6/10 Sean Hunt ride...@gmail.com:
I like. I think it should be 2 elected + the Promotor.
Promotor + 1 prerogative + 1 elected?
At this point, perhaps the three positions
On Thu, Jun 11, 2009 at 8:31 PM, Geoffrey Spear geoffsp...@gmail.comwrote:
On Thu, Jun 11, 2009 at 3:21 PM, Aaron Goldfeinaarongoldf...@gmail.com
wrote:
I initiate an Agoran decision to decide the holder of the Anarchist
office. The eligible voters are the active players, the vote collector
I transfer a prop from myself to BobTHJ because I really like his
Proposal Review Board idea, and I've stolen parts of it for this
proto:
{
Create a proto pool. Only disinterested proposals can be submitted
directly to the proposal pool; all others must first be submitted to
the proto pool.
I submit the following two protos. The first is intended to be adopted
in Agora, the other in B. Comments welcome.
{
It's Greek to Me
AI = 1, II = 1
Adopt a new power 1 Rule:
{{
Kolios is a type of asset and a currency, tracked by the Accountor.
A player CAN destroy a Note to create 5
On Sat, Jun 13, 2009 at 4:03 PM, Alex Smithais...@bham.ac.uk wrote:
On Sat, 2009-06-13 at 10:47 -0400, Geoffrey Spear wrote:
Add a penalty for authoring proposals that are rejected to the current
distributability system and the problem goes away without an extra
layer of bureaucracy.
What
On Sat, Jun 13, 2009 at 5:02 PM, Kerim Aydinke...@u.washington.edu wrote:
On Sat, 13 Jun 2009, Charles Walker wrote:
I was just trying to keep the Janitor in work, honest.
I submit the following proposal and intend to make it Distributable
without objection:
Again, I object. -G.
I feel
.
I support.
Having received no objections and one support, I act on behalf of LNP
to register it.
I believe this fails because all LNP parties need to consent to it.
Wooble already has privately, so c., could you please consent to the
resolution of this intent?
--
C-walker (Charles Walker)
On Wed, Aug 26, 2009 at 4:37 PM, comexcom...@gmail.com wrote:
Proposal: Fix R107 (AI=3, II=0)
{
Amend Rule 107 by replacing correctly identified with publicly
identified.
I'm pretty sure that the identification should still be correct as
well as public.
--
C-walker (Charles Walker)
On Wed, Sep 2, 2009 at 8:02 PM, Jonatan
Kilhamnjonatan.kilh...@gmail.com wrote:
=== Grand Poobah's Deck of Government report ===
Suggestion for addition to this and all other card reports: what cards
actually do. I can never remember.
--
C-walker (Charles Walker)
On Sat, Sep 5, 2009 at 2:32 PM, Jonatan
Kilhamnjonatan.kilh...@gmail.com wrote:
2009/9/5 Charles Walker charles.w.wal...@googlemail.com:
I spend Distrib-u-matic to make the proposal FIXME Distributable.
I go on hold.
I audit myself.
I come off hold.
This destroys a bunch of random cards
judge GUILTY / SILENCE.
I appeal this case. By custom Agora has permitted new officers a full
ASAP period to fulfill outstanding obligations.
Game custom does not take precedence over the text of the rules.
--
C-walker (Charles Walker)
On 11/09/2009, comex com...@gmail.com wrote:
I intend, without three objections, to change Contract B's contestmaster to
me.
I intend, without three objections, to change Contract B's threshold
index to 70.
Contract B?
--
C-walker (Charles Walker)
in the first place, and if e was,
whether it was legal.
--
C-walker (Charles Walker)
On Sat, Sep 12, 2009 at 2:35 PM, Elliott Hird
penguinoftheg...@googlemail.com wrote:
2009/9/12 Charles Walker charles.w.wal...@googlemail.com:
I intend, without objection, to flip the Recognition of #nomirc on
Freenode to Neutral.
I object; from what I hear its players are a little
On Sat, Sep 12, 2009 at 4:49 PM, Elliott Hird
penguinoftheg...@googlemail.com wrote:
2009/9/12 Charles Walker charles.w.wal...@googlemail.com:
I don't see how this is a valid objection. Agora should be open to
diplomatic relations with heathen nomics as well as the more refined
ones.
Well
cards or just Rule-defined assets).
Comments?
--
C-walker (Charles Walker)
On Sun, Sep 13, 2009 at 3:57 PM, Charles Walker
charles.w.wal...@googlemail.com wrote:
On Sun, Sep 13, 2009 at 3:52 PM, Geoffrey Spear geoffsp...@gmail.com wrote:
chamber: democratic
ai: 3.0
interest: 1
proposer: coppro
coauthors:
title: FIXME
submit_date: 2009-08-27
submit_mid
On Wed, Sep 16, 2009 at 8:01 PM, Geoffrey Spear geoffsp...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Sep 16, 2009 at 2:55 PM, Charles Walker
charles.w.wal...@googlemail.com wrote:
Wooble, have you admitted or denied this CoE? I can't seem to find I
reply and I thought it would be best to point it out before
criminal CFJs brought against me.
I repeat my argument for GUILTY in both of these cases. While BobTHJ's
reports have indirectly been found to be correct, they were still
misleading in that they made no reference to the ambiguity surrounding
my card ownership.
--
C-walker (Charles Walker)
c wrote:
Charles Walker wrote:
I change my nickname to Walker.
So, you subtracted me?
Yeah, sorry.
--
Charles Walker
On Mon, Sep 21, 2009 at 7:42 AM, Sean Hunt ride...@gmail.com wrote:
Charles Walker wrote:
On Mon, Sep 21, 2009 at 12:29 AM, Sean Hunt ride...@gmail.com wrote:
This message serves to initiate the Agoran Decision to decide the
holder of the office of Insulator. For this Decision, the
eligible
cards are only awarded for first registration.
--
Charles Walker
and inactivations and the
behaviour of the Herald. I'm not sure I want to though.
NttDF?
--
Charles Walker
On Fri, Oct 2, 2009 at 5:55 PM, Roger Hicks pidge...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Sep 29, 2009 at 11:48, Charles Walker
charles.w.wal...@googlemail.com wrote:
I deposit 3 * X Crop for 300zm.
This fails, you have no X crops to deposit.
comex, I believe your 'Ask Bob' finction is broken: BobTHJ's
.
--
Charles Walker
are currently the only dealer, are you suggesting that you
might act in an underhand manner when performing audits? :P
--
Charles Walker
On Mon, Oct 12, 2009 at 2:38 AM, Roger Hicks pidge...@gmail.com wrote:
ais523
Majority Leader
Total: 1, Hand Limit: 5
Major Arcana cards do not affect Hand Limits.
--
Charles Walker
coppro wrote:
Charles Walker wrote:
BobTHJ wrote:
ais523
Majority Leader
Total: 1, Hand Limit: 5
Major Arcana cards do not affect Hand Limits.
They do, however, BobTHJ's reports are somewhat misleading as they imply
that hand limits are on a per-deck basis, which
: the
House of Commons (which has green benches), the House of Lords (which
has red benches) and the Crown, which I thought was best represented
by Purple. I wouldn't necessarily be against a proposal to change
Purple to Blue, or any other colour, though.
--
Charles Walker
the Change
Deck.
I suggest this wording:
When an interested proposal is adopted, its author earns a number of
draws from the Change Deck equal to the interest index of the
proposal, and the coauthors of the proposal who are players (if any)
earn one draw from the Change Deck each.
--
Charles
I've made a modest little Google site to hold my Agora-related stuff.
To date, it only has my Ambassador report and a comprehensive list of
links to other Agoran sites, but I hope to expand it in the future.
It's at http://sites.google.com/site/agorahub/
--
Charles Walker
breaks Rule 1607. Better that than a stagnant pool.)
Please don't take this the wrong way, but I think it would be a lot
easier for the new Promotor to catch up on Distributability of you
stopped using conditional Distrib-u-matic spends.
--
Charles Walker
Collector.
The possible options are FOR and AGAINST.
President c., when do you plan to resolve this motion?
--
Charles Walker
On Mon, Oct 19, 2009 at 9:34 PM, Charles Walker
charles.w.wal...@googlemail.com wrote:
On Mon, Oct 19, 2009 at 8:45 PM, comex com...@gmail.com wrote:
===
Industrial Bank Agora Report
CoE: You are missing my recent
On Tue, Oct 20, 2009 at 9:06 PM, Sean Hunt ride...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Oct 19, 2009 at 12:23 PM, Charles Walker
charles.w.wal...@googlemail.com wrote:
Friendly B Nomic
(http://www.nomic.net/~nomicwiki/index.php/B%20Nomic)
I humbly request the Ambassador flip
to see a Legalistic contest which was its own
contestmaster. Is that possible under the current Rules?
--
Charles Walker
On Wed, Oct 21, 2009 at 3:27 AM, comex com...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Oct 20, 2009 at 10:08 PM, Taral tar...@gmail.com wrote:
They suck. That is all.
--
Charles Walker
-manifesto.html
--
Charles Walker
On Wed, Oct 21, 2009 at 1:20 AM, Aaron Goldfein aarongoldf...@gmail.com wrote:
With this mild punishment, e may learn that such annoying actions are
not within the spirit of the game.
Do you seriously think this is in the spirit of the game?
--
Charles Walker
for that. The First Speaker emself had some
related ideas:
http://axiom.anu.edu.au/~michaeln/agora/subgame-manifesto.html
FRC.
BlogNomic.
I mean a nomic within a nomic. Read Micheal's manifesto.
--
Charles Walker
On Thu, Oct 22, 2009 at 1:48 PM, ais523 callforjudgem...@yahoo.co.uk wrote:
On Tue, 2009-10-20 at 20:13 -0600, Sean Hunt wrote:
6537 0 1.0 Walker R2215 Fix
PRESENT; what would this do?
Correct a grammar/ spelling mistake?
--
Charles Walker
On Thu, Oct 22, 2009 at 5:21 PM, Roger Hicks pidge...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Oct 22, 2009 at 09:18, Charles Walker
charles.w.wal...@googlemail.com wrote:
For each of the following proposals, I intend, without 3 objections,
to make it Distributable:
Anarchy Anarchy
I object
Abduct
On Thu, Oct 22, 2009 at 5:34 PM, Roger Hicks pidge...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Oct 22, 2009 at 10:25, Charles Walker
charles.w.wal...@googlemail.com wrote:
On Thu, Oct 22, 2009 at 5:21 PM, Roger Hicks pidge...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Oct 22, 2009 at 09:18, Charles Walker
charles.w.wal
On Thu, Oct 22, 2009 at 6:02 PM, Jonatan Kilhamn
jonatan.kilh...@gmail.com wrote:
2009/10/22 Roger Hicks pidge...@gmail.com:
On Thu, Oct 22, 2009 at 10:38, Charles Walker
charles.w.wal...@googlemail.com wrote:
On Thu, Oct 22, 2009 at 5:34 PM, Roger Hicks pidge...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Oct
?
--
Charles Walker
On Thu, Oct 22, 2009 at 6:26 PM, Charles Walker
charles.w.wal...@googlemail.com wrote:
On Thu, Oct 22, 2009 at 6:20 PM, Roger Hicks pidge...@gmail.com wrote:
I object to all pending attempts to make an interested proposal
distributable which I have not already objected to. Use a
Distrib-u
On Fri, Oct 23, 2009 at 1:37 AM, comex com...@gmail.com wrote:
BUY [you pay zm]
Offerer Cost Selling
Pavitra 500zm Minister without Portfolio
Don't we have rates for the Major Arcana? If not, I guess we should make some.
--
Charles Walker
On Fri, Oct 23, 2009 at 5:13 PM, Roger Hicks pidge...@gmail.com wrote:
Add a new card to the deck of change:
Free Parking - Specify up to three assets owned by the LFD. Those
assets are transferred to you.
I could get ribbons and all sorts with that. I'd restrict it to cards.
--
Charles
.
--
Charles Walker
Frequency by announcement,
and SHALL NOT deal a card before e does so.
with:
Changing the frequency of each card type is secured.
}}
--
Charles Walker
have been changed, don't I earn two draws from each
deck for registering?
--
Charles Walker
soon, but I will be
gunning for something like this when it does.
--
Charles Walker
the
current to either straight FPTP/plurality or to IRV.
--
Charles Walker
Just testing Gmail filters.
--
Charles Walker
Is everyone else getting an error when trying to access Nomic Wiki?
http://www.nomic.net/~nomicwiki/index.php/Agora
--
Charles Walker
down the B wiki for a while. I
don't believe e reads the Agora lists.
Will do.
--
Charles Walker
...@nomic.net
--
Charles Walker
It's like a proactive Greetor.
Do you intend the office to have a legal requirement to increase the number
of active players?
Charles Walker
Sent on Mobile
On 20 Mar 2011 03:30, Aaron Goldfein aarongoldf...@gmail.com wrote:
As I'm sure all have noticed, Agoran activity is very low. When I first
Would I be right in saying that the class of a crime no longer has any
effect on the ninny (i.e. that they no longer receive a worse punishment for
a greater class of crime)?
--
Charles Walker
. Would it really be that hard?
--
Charles Walker
be set or changed to a
duration longer than fourteen days.
Can this ever happen under the current rules?
Otherwise I support the proposal, and would probably vote FOR it in
its current state anyway.
--
Charles Walker
So do I.
Charles Walker
Sent via Mobile
On 21 Mar 2011 19:20, omd c.ome...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Mar 21, 2011 at 3:04 PM, Geoffrey Spear geoffsp...@gmail.com
wrote:
I intend with 2 support to file a motion to reconsider CFJ 2980.
I intend with 2 support to file a motion to reconsider CFJ
, by
failing to judge case 2980 within the time limit.
NoV 112.
Wait, why does the Herald assign NoV IDs?
--
Charles Walker
1 - 100 of 438 matches
Mail list logo
